It does vary by area, obviously, but in South Florida they don't really go for military background folks as much anymore. They want people to learn the systems they have in place without preconceived notions of how to act. The poor firearms training in general probably leads to more errors among police. There was also a trend to think of ex-military as all having PTSD after Gulf. It might be easy to think of military background leading to more violent altercations, but military has rules of engagement drilled into them much more than police.
If it went back to the roaring 20's they'd probably see a similar spike during prohibition to that 80's/ early 90's bit of drug war. I think the drug war marked a huge escalation as it becomes easier to actually track interstate crime and prosecute folks. Drugs became very profitable, but it arose with a particular apathy towards trying to lay low and escape vs shooting it out. Gun technology hasn't changed significantly from the roaring 20's when dueling tommy guns punctuated things, but the average cop has left behind the the old revolver because now they're actually expected to break up drug operations rather than drinking with the buddies at an illegal bar during prohibition.Nice feelings bro. Here's some facts.
- - - Updated - - -
You did miss the one important thing of "banned in 1986", you cannot manufacture new machineguns after 1986 for us mere peasants. You can only buy machineguns registered before 1986, which is why they run $8000 and way way up. The $200 tax stamp is a transfer tax, but is tied to a specific transfer of a specific weapon, rather than getting the stamp, then looking for a product. You buy the product, file the form with $200, then wait for approval (currently about a year).
An FFL can get his Special Occupational Tax (SOT) for $500 a year, which allows him to transfer to/from other SOT dealers without the $200 tax on each transaction. Otherwise he would pay the $200 tax each time.I do not know if Class III weapons are subject to the same FFL rules as regular guns (meaning, I don't know if you can do the transaction online and have it mailed to any regular FFL dealer; the dealer side of the law isn't my forte).
More worrisome is how many of the young men are clearly losing their hairline!On topic, I would presume the whole shaved head thing is simply so that suspects could not leverage the officer's hair in the event of an altercation. I don't really see anything spooky beyond that.
"I only feel two things Gary, nothing, and nothingness."
The rule of law is absolute. Why? Because when it's not, you get fanatical rednecks who go around shooting up gay bars and killing everyone for their sins against God. Shame on you.
I don't understand a lot of the sentiments in this thread. It is extremely obvious that most American cities are wildly under-policed. You can go almost an entire day of driving around in a decent sized city and only see one or two cop cars. In Japan and other countries with less serious crime problems, you see a police station every block or two in major cities.
Chatting with my wife yesterday, we were talking about this and some surrounding issues. My hypothesis is that the United States combines a peaceful Western European level of tolerance for criminality, plus a population that's much more criminally inclined than Western Europe, plus an unwillingness to take genuinely extreme measures (significantly increased levels of exile, capital punishment, or corporal punishment). So, we get a series of twisted half measures like a massive carceral state, huge surveillance apparatus, and police behavior ranging from low-level harassment to outright violence. No one much likes this arrangement, but it's hard to see a path to significant improvement.
Sort of a nit-pick but isn't the first picture of Canadian police?
I keep my head shaved year-round because (1) my hair grows out thick, making it hard to maintain, and (2) the head is the warmest part of the body, so keeping my head cool is a high priority (especially because I become dehydrated easily) even in the winter, and (3) because I sweat a lot, shorter hair retains less moisture, so the sweat evaporates quicker.
Please stop generalizing that men who shave their heads are trying to "send a message". It's fine if you don't like my shaved hair style but please, for the love of God, forego the judgement.
"We need to kill more people"
We have studies on this saying that doesn't work so...
You think we need a tougher system when we have one of the toughest in the western world to begin with? What foolishness is this? "let's be even more tough!" when it clearly isn't working.
Significant improvement is rather easy, we do what other countries do.
Firstly get rid of the most of the fucking police departments. We have far too many leading to differing degrees of standards. It also makes it hard to take a bad cop and move them to another department when the department is one per state. You wouldn't end up with an officer in Florida being moved from one district to another because he falsified confessions and was given the option to go to jail or move... so he moves and then locks up any black person and charges them with an unsolved robbery. Shit like that doesn't happen when you have a single state wide department.
Training becomes standardized everyone within a single state has one form of training you don't get departments implementing their vastly different own sense of training.
You also don't get officers who are rivals to other officers because they're from another town. This is a pretty big problem in New Jersey and I imagine it is the same in other places. Where officers in Jersey City give officers from Secaucus shit because... they're from differing towns. The tribalism dies when everyone is a single department.
There is no need to have sheriffs, and town officers, and state officers we don't need over 18k departments with over 18k different training methods and different standards.
The answer is to condense departments, standardize training, require higher bars.
Violent crime rates in the UK are about the same to higher than the USA so this idea that "we're just violent people" is unfounded.
With regards to the bold, it's necessarily combined with an unwillingness to consider and implement social reforms to address the underlying socioeconomic factors contributing to that increased criminality.
Western Europe and Canada and Australia don't all have lower rates of criminal offense, and particularly violent offense, by accident. And there's really nothing about the USA's circumstances that provide any insurmountable expectation, here.
And it isn't that those nations have stricter penalties for crime. Pretty typically, the opposite.
You need to be willing to discuss and implement policy to address underlying socioeconomic factors if you really want to address the problem of crime. This isn't a wild hypothesis; it's standard policy practice pretty much everywhere.
As for police culture in particular, there seems to have been a shift among American police forces from seeing themselves as serving and protecting their communities, to approaching crime as a "war" against the "enemy", said "enemy" being that same community, or at least sections of it that are indistinguishable from the rest.
In Canada, if I get pulled over by a cop while driving, he's going to saunter up, tap on my window, we'll have a conversation, he might give me a ticket, that's pretty much it. In the USA, the officer usually approaches weapon drawn, and is in many cases ordering the civilian to step out or show their hands or the like; it's presumed to be a violently hostile situation. That shift in approach matters. It means civilians are, quite rightly, afraid of the police, rather than seeing them as protectors. It means every interaction with an officer starts out negative, and is likely to get worse. It means that not only do the police see the people as their enemy, the people see the police as an enemy. Wrap that up and let it cook for 50 years, and you get the modern United States.
What I find hilarious is that in towns like mine, which rank in the top 20% safety-wise...
Yes, we have had a murder but it was because the kid was schizophrenic. The most crime that happens are marijuana busts, domestic disputes and petty larceny... it's a joke.
My town is like the most boring place a cop could work in, it is so safe.
Even the residents are getting mad about people gettin' jailed over marijuana lol, "Do something else, leave them alone it's about to get legalized!" It really is about to, btw. with total expungements.
I will say this though... the cops in this town are A+. They are really good people and I like 'em all.
I was not, actually. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birmingham_campaign Reverse image searching works wonders. Yikes. What kind of damage would police dogs do in situations like that? It's hard to tell from a still image. Either way, absolutely insane stuff. All this as recently as the 1960's.
I have to wonder how they justified this insanely evil BS to themselves in a country that's supposed to have a right to protest.
My Collection
- Bring back my damn zoom distance/MoP Portals - I read OP minimum, 1st page maximum-make wow alt friendly again -Please post constructively(topkek) -Kill myself
And it's not possible. Your original claim was that a person can go into a department store and walk out with a machine gun. You cannot do that. The only way to get an automatic weapon is 1) from a vendor allowed to sell such items and 2) after a strenuous background check and legal loopholes, and 3) only for a limited set of weapons manufactured before the act came into effect.
It is a issue when most people cannot buy one. Also, link the last time a person used a machine gun ( as defined by the FBI as being a machine gun ) to commit a crime.
- - - Updated - - -
We have the right for peaceful protests. And in a lot of cases, permits are needed to do such in some places. Blocking access for other citizens to a public building or road, is not legal unless you get a permit which allows for such. If one is denied a permit, there are legal ways to challenge it. Otherwise, you can create violence by acting unlawful. Dogs are still used by the police and have been found to be very effective tools for them.
" If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.." - Abraham Lincoln
“ The Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to - prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms..” - Samuel Adams
This has not been my experience or the experience of any of my friends (among which there is a good mix of ethnicities). I've had several encounters with police over the years and I have never once had a weapon drawn on me or have seen police behaving with anything other than professionalism. One even talked about surfing with me while I was living in Florida. People's perceptions are seasoned by what we see in the media. I suspect those incidents, while numerous, are still a relatively small portion of the total police and community interactions which surely number in the tens of thousands every day.