What has this to do with your false claim that there aren't tons of highly successful publicly owned companies, exactly?
The claim was that worker ownership makes it nearly impossible for said workers to end up exploited due to the lack of the perverse financial incentive that private ownership engenders, not that it's a panacea for all forms of unethical behavior. And even if it isn't, a self-appointed expert on every subject under the sun should be well aware that a single example does not constitute evidence of a trend.You claimed that people didn't have incentives to engage in unethical behaviour, and yet they did that.
Maybe try reading people's posts before accusing others of not reading posts.
What on earth does setting up guard rails against violent social upheaval have to do with workplace regulation? You know, besides you trying to substitute having an actual argument with red scare bullshit?I talked about Marx and Engels, who were squarely in the violent revolution camp, as you should know; so knowing that a forcible overthrow of the social structure can lead to Reign of Terror - don't you think it would be prudent to set up guard-rails against that?
No, you obviously haven't.Just empty words as usual, and obviously I've read Marx (and Engels), including 'Das Kapital' (including the really boring parts).
- - - Updated - - -
Don't forget Angela Davis and Abdullah Ocalan.