The more of Laize's posts I read, the more I wonder if he's really that completely out of touch with reality.
The more of Laize's posts I read, the more I wonder if he's really that completely out of touch with reality.
What happened to stay out of my state?If the United States were declared a Right-to-Work country tomorrow I think we'd all be better off.
You're doing a better job than most. And that's saying something when you take into account the fact that most of what comes out of your head is liberal screed.
Y-incisions might do it for some of them.Pro tip: they're just like other college students. Except they can draw better. And see naked women in class sometimes. The only other students who get to do that are med students. And their naked women are dead.
My opinion of unions sits somewhere on the totem pole between "a particularly stygian-smelling fart" and "Justin Bieber".Man, just full of insulting generalizations today aren't you?
You've known this for a while. Don't act surprised.
---------- Post added 2012-12-08 at 08:24 AM ----------
You're right.
Allow me to amend that statement.
"If every state decided they were going to be a RTW state tomorrow, I think we'd all be better off."
Barium can show problems in the GI and cardiovascular system with a CT scan. The problem, apart from greatly increasing your radiation intake every time you get a CT scan, is that knowing what the problem is is not the same as knowing why the problem is there and what you have to do to get rid of it.
---------- Post added 2012-12-08 at 08:25 AM ----------
they're called barium injections
I'm afraid I've never been privy to an ER where a patient presented with a clot in the heart. I did share a room with a DVT patient who was receiving contrast venography though.
I said I acquired a working knowledge of what does what. Not that I was as good as a medical professional.
www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angiography
It's actually really cool stuff
I've been in live surgeries using this technique. It was possibly the most interesting and exciting part of my internship, and is one that I remember quite well.
Referring to the wiki article, though: "Depending on the type of angiogram, access to the blood vessels is gained most commonly through the femoral artery, to look at the left side of the heart and at the arterial system; or the jugular or femoral vein, to look at the right side of the heart and at the venous system. Using a system of guide wires and catheters, a type of contrast agent (which shows up by absorbing the x-rays), is added to the blood to make it visible on the x-ray images."
The problem with CT scans is that you don't find it right away. You need to shoot the contrast agent in multiple times in order to find it. Imagine that picture at the top of the article being very dim, then when the contrast agent is shot in the entire thing lights up for a moment with the beating of their heart. They then have a few seconds to go through the CT scan and attempt to find the single point where the line of contrast agent is obstructed. Catheters are ideal for this since speed is an absolute necessity when dealing with the potential for further heart damage (this is something usually done on people who were just brought in for heart attacks and have a clot).
I've received quite enough radiation for my lifetime thanks.
Tc-99m injections twice yearly for the last 5 years and continuing. More CT scans than I have been able to keep track of. 4 KUB X-rays in the last 2-3 years have probably worked a number on my family jewels as well. Then there was a scan where I was injected with a shielded syringe and laid on a table with a scanner that picked up the radiation emitted from my heart like looking at a glowing light bulb through the skin. Can't remember the name of it it was so long ago. Then there was weekly radiation treatment for 6 months. Oh and 2 fluoroscopies. Those were really cool though.
So I've had conversations with more than a few radiologists and similar professionals.
It is definitely a complex procedure, and I have the utmost respect for the people who perform it and think that they deserve to be paid well for their skill and knowledge. It's the type of thing you couldn't learn anywhere but in school or in the field.
I'm just wondering, what were you interning for? I am incredibly biased in favor of people who work in the medical field <3
---------- Post added 2012-12-08 at 08:43 AM ----------
Make sure you keep an eye out for cancer, radiation treatment is some miraculous stuff but it isn't without its drawbacks
Last edited by Skizo; 2012-12-08 at 08:44 AM.
I like how you completely bypassed my entire question. Its proven that you only want to try to make yourself look good, when in fact you are making yourself look like an idiot.
It is typical for the far right wing states to make bad decisions. If they are so great at making decisions why are almost all red states welfare states in the word that they get far more from Washington than they pay in in the form of taxes. We constantly here them complaining of the takers in the country while themself are the biggest taker.
This screw up will be forced to be covered by the federal government as well. Always having the blue states the feds bailing out the southern far right wing states when the far right wing dogma is costing them money.
Texas is a notable exception to that rule, being the second wealthiest state in the nation with a best financial record than California.
They didn't make the decision because of a financial choice. They actively chose to pay more state taxes and forgo federal medicaid funding to support their choices. $200 million in this regard is really chump change.
For House which you denoted by story is a infectious disease specialist. Only thing really is that hes considered very smart, did not say anything about specialization in all diseases.
http://www.nature.com/news/2008/0805....2008.840.html
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/453278.../#.UMMU2nfG13s
Nothing about House said that they were trained to be diagnostician, they were just a collaboration of doctors.
Birth control should be provided freely as a public service as it does the entire public a great service.
Saying it is unjust to tax religious people for such a thing is like saying it is unjust to tax someone who doesn't drive to maintain the roads.
FFS stop being afraid of sex and give condoms and birth control out either heavily subsidised or for free
Bottom line is humans want and need to have sex so give them the tools to be safe while doing it
Unwanted pregnancy and STDs will plummet with good sex education and easy access to birth control its a win win for everyone
Religion needs to stick its fucking nose out of peoples bedrooms IMO
Here's the thing: Telling poor people "to not have sex" is ineffective. Offering them access to birth control is effective. The first goes against human nature to have sex, the other works with it. And in the end, the latter is less expensive because the former leads to more babies in the welfare system.
It would be nice if people were responsible and just didn't have sex when they couldn't afford it, but the reality is people won't be responsible, so providing safe sex practices is the cheapest and most responsible thing to do.
---------- Post added 2012-12-08 at 06:19 AM ----------
I didn't realize women had equal reproductive organs as men.
Putin khuliyo