so what about all the pride overwatch garbage that they forced so hard? Business does business stuff, no one is surprised.
Lots of citizen point seekers are in this thread it seems. You guys are so easy to spot.
"Stand up for what's good in this world, unless it costs us money!"
every corporation ever. shame on you blizzard.
bet if China had some shit to say about the gun violence in America blizzard wouldn't do shit.
Last edited by Vargulf the Happy Husky; 2019-10-13 at 12:16 PM.
I don't allow political talk at my magic tournaments in my store so I don't see the big deal why this guy got banned. He knew the rules, chose to break them and got banned for it. Good.
There's many, many ways to share your views outside somebody else's platform, do it there.
Why is this even news fuck off. I come here for game updates.
What? :,) most definitely not. Also, if you'd care to read any of my previous posts regarding the matter you'd see that I've stated that China is a disgusting, inhumane country that deserves to rot and that I support Hong Kong 100%. However, like I've also said, were Blizzard wrong in punishing him for breaking the stream rules? No. Were they too harsh and went about it in the wrong way? Yes.
- - - Updated - - -
Apart from they don't. It doesn't matter on what the issue was, whether than was pro or anti HK, pro or anti trump, rules were broken. People are being completely retarded about the whole thing and taking it way out of context.
Ofc it matters what the issue was. a collegiate team making the same statement wasn't banned. Because it wasn't a broadcast shown in China.
Other political opinions are fine, like support for gays, because it was not an inconvenience for Blizzard, because it wasn't shown in China.
So the problem isn't that he made the statement, its that he made the statement where China could see it.
Which goes entirely against the statement Blizzard China made that his punishment had nothing to do with China.
Blizzards stance is proven to not be 'keep politics out of our games'. Its 'keep politics out of our games when its inconvenient for us'.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Apart from gay/same-sex rights are a basic human right and aren't an opinion/political opinion. Of course China is lacking those, which is why I stand with Hong Kong, but there's a time and place. He knew what he was doing was breaking the rules, which he also acknowledged, but the punishment for his actions were too harsh. Blizzard were way too hasty in their response to the situation honestly, which they've acknowledged as well and reduced his ban. 6 months is still too long in my opinion, but it's just unfortunate that they set an example with him and with HK being the political issue behind it. They had to do it though because it's a question of where does it stop? People don't want to watch streams and games and be constantly bombarded with politcal messages, whether that's backing KH, standing for or against trump, for or against brexit, whatever it may be - people (at least i for one) watch game streams because they don't involve any of that. It would be like watching Blizzcon and the presenters or guests starting to talk about Brexit or any main political issue - there's enough of it from main news sources and that's where it should stay, which is why I agree with them taking action. However, Blizzard should just come forward and say they stand with Hong Kong because I honestly think they do.
Last edited by THEORACLE64; 2019-10-13 at 03:42 PM.
There was a big analysis of it by a bilingual Chinese/English speaker, pointing out how a huge amount of the English sounds wonky, and then how it makes sense if it's a direct translation from Chinese because Chinese grammar is missing a lot of things native English does.
Twitter link: https://twitter.com/SGBluebell/statu...147052544?s=20
Composite screenshot of people from 4chan pointing out how the posting date of the "apology" is Oct 12th, which is not possible because it showed up on the 11th... except by the time it was posted it was Oct 12 in China.
https://imgur.com/gallery/TlsXfzm
The evidence is certainly circumstantial, but as a native English speaker, with a linguistics background who is a teacher, I can vouch for the likelihood of the analysis (considering most of my students aren't native English speakers). Either J. Allen Brack isn't a native English speaker, or he didn't write that letter.
Cheerful lack of self-preservation