That is immaterial to the discussion at hand. And you should drop it because I could just easily say "the night elves are the highborne" but now we have nightborne. Who are highborne as well, and call themselves as such.
Blizzard already did so with pandaren and the allied races.And the fact that it "muddles the conversation" (in your terms) is indicative that playable alliance high elves would "muddle" the faction lines, or in other words, blur faction lines.
Both got minimal differences that are rendered null and void with the way armor covers the player's model. The nightborne, even LESS differences. You literally cannot differentiate one from the other out in the game world before the game tells you which one they are by the color of their outline and name. But if that bothers you so much: the high elves already have thematic differences, so all we have to do is give them minimal aesthetic differences, to the level of nightborne, to satisfy you.Why do you think both void elves and nightborne were given aestehtical and thematical changes to differentiate them from their parent race?
And the thalassian elves would not become neutral if high elves became playable, so I don't know why this insistence on "neutral race" nonsense.It does matter that pandaren were introduced as neutral. Your comparing apples to oranges, the pandaren situation is not the high elven situation... it happened under completely different circumstances.
Veressa was not leaving the Alliance to join the Horde. She was leaving to join her sister because she was hurting and wanted at least a semblance of a stable family. She was not going to join the Horde.I didn't take anything out of context.