Lol. I did no such thing. I asked a question while stating how he comes across.
I never defined "punishment" in that way at all. What I was doing was pointing out that restricting gear outside of group content to 425 as being inconsistent with getting rewarded according to the effort/gear quality curve.
In what possible world is restricting people to 425 necessary in order to preserve the effort/gear quality curve?
Although I didn't really delve into what I would consider fair (since I was really just trying to understand where he was coming from first), I think that there are objectively reasonable parameters that can be applied.
WoW is a progression based game which means that the point of gear is to enable you to move to progressively more difficult content. If the gear you are getting isn't good enough to enable you to ever progress, then that is punishing. By the same token, gear that is so powerful that it trivialises harder content is also hugely problematic.
Like I said above, I don't understand why he thinks it is necessary to restrict gear from non-group content to 425 because he never bothered to substantiate his stance. So I can only try and guess as to what rationale there might be behind such reasons, but even then (accepting the requirement for an effort/gear quality relationship) his standpoint still doesn't make any sense.
Secondly, I am making an assumption here that this is a restriction that wouldn't affect him personally. So unless I am wrong in that assumption, then this really isn't about personal preference at all, it's about wanting to impose rules on other players for reasons that remain vague.