No one (worth any ounce of breath/byte) is saying every man, or even the majority. But it doesn't take a majority, it just takes the higher ups (those with control), which is what seems to be the issue here. Stop assuming that exposing a problem requires some sort of extremist take.
As for airing public laundry... It's a double edge sword. On one hand, letting the public know is the only reason that Blizzard is actually doing anything about it (these issues are YEARS old) but on the other hand, it does make every online shithead virtue signal with zero evidence/understanding of both this issue and of the law.
Except you're literally looking at the side effect of society forced gender roles and going "See, they don't actually want to do _______!" when literally the amount of women's interest in engineering has gone up. Men and women are different but this isn't the difference.
Maybe some extremist online "woketeers" are pushing that, but progressives just want the option to be there without the typical "No, you should be interested in _____ instead! That stuff is for boys only!" gender role narrative. Which does exist, even if you personally don't experience it (which I doubt).
You call men 'incels' as in 'involuntarily celibate', men being unable to have sex despite wanting to. That's a macho insult. One that that "feminists" love to use without appreciating the irony of doing so.
Read before you comment, thanks dude.
Try again next time.
- - - Updated - - -
Honestly, incel is just the new "virgin," and it's just as much of a high school tier insult no matter how people try to dress it up or try to claim it's different to cope.
There is a difference between "Men who do this are a problem, especially those that enable it." and "Not all men!". It's similar to people shouting "All Lives Matter" to BLM demonstrations or "Pancreatic cancer matters too!" at a beast cancer rally or "My house is important too!" at fire fighters trying to save a burning home or "Man, I love my grandma" when a friend mentions their grandparents passed away. No one disputes these but those feeling the need to include it comes off as shutting down voices with a defensive motive rather than trying to be fair/accurate.
But until there's a better way for companies to be held accountable, we gotta deal with terrible online discourse to get them to actually act.
By trying to make my personal sex life relevant to the validity of my argument you're doubling down on macho culture.
A more progressive stance would be to instill on people that their viewpoints aren't connecting to how much approval other people give them for it, be it sexual or otherwise.
I will not believe a thing will be done in good faith for as long as jab and kotick are in charge. Not a single fucking thing.