im failing to see the point. he asked what war the horde won, people have stated that they very clearly won the first war, which they did. it doesnt matter what the war was about or who was involved in it. the horde was at war with a faction in the first warcraft, they won that war.
Yes, and we were discussing it in the context of the things that Garrosh has done in game lately in this expansion and in Cataclysm. I disputed that and felt that there is very little that Garrosh has done which can even be debated as being good or evil. I feel this because so much of what he has done is so obviously evil, or are similar in meaning to evil, be it 'barbaric', 'cold hearted', 'remorseless', or whatever other semantics you can think of. And that was it. Can we move on now?
Pretty much the point I made all over the thread, the Horde never won a war against the Alliance. It was in the grasp of winning the Second War, but Gul'dan betrayal took that from Doomhammer.
---------- Post added 2012-10-28 at 01:51 AM ----------
The Horde didn't answered to the Legion after Doomhammer took control. Which was before the Second War.
No dictator, no invader, can hold an imprisoned population by the force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against that power- governments, and tyrants, and armies can not stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. Now take the words of this man, never give up the fight! to freedom of his people of a evil tyrant.
We have faced trials and danger, threats to our world and our way of life. And yet, we persevere. We are the Horde. We will not let anything break our spirits!"
There were no innocent orcs in Ashenvale.
---------- Post added 2012-10-28 at 05:12 AM ----------
The Burning Legion was not directly involved in the Second War. The Horde was fighting for them without even knowing it (except for Gul'dan and the Shadow Council). So the Horde was defeated during the Second War. The Burning Legion was defeated during the third.
---------- Post added 2012-10-28 at 05:28 AM ----------
It will be a win, since they will have met their objectives : stop the Horde from attacking them and get rid of Garrosh. They could even regain some land lost to the Horde. A war does not have to end with the utter destruction of the enemy nation or faction. Fortunately. Even if the Horde survives under a renewed leadership and organisation, that war will be a humiliating experience for them : they will have needed the help of their traditional enemy to get rid of their tyrannic warchief and retake control of their capital city. The war will end with fireworks in Stormwind and a sigh of relief mixed with a vague feeling of shame in Orgrimmar.
Unless the Alliance are able to suppress ALL of the Horde or ALL of the Horde surrender, the war isn't over. Even if they took Orgrimmar, there's still the Undercity, Quel'Thalas/Silvermoon, Thunderbluff and Troll city (idk) that seemingly still exist filled with people who still hate the Alliance. Had all the Axis powers stayed in play, defeating Hitler in Germany doesn't end the war when the rest of the participating countries were still active, yes, it would have been a major blow but the war wouldn't have been over.
How do the horde lose? The horde win their civil war against Garrosh, the alliance are just there for the ride.
The Horde doesn't lose. They help the Alliance dethrone Garrosh. If the Alliance were to win, they'd eliminate/assimilate the Horde, not join forces to defeat an unwanted dictator.
The Horde also isn't "always losing wars". They won the First War, lost the Second War, and won the Third War.
In war, no one wins.
Yes. Time to uninstall WoW, the conclusive truth finally comes out: Alliance>Horde.
the Horde from before w3 is not the same horde we have now. THose were just demonic pawns. They werent fighting for themselves, they were just a starting army to make way for the real war, the Arrival of the legion.