(25) man is a thing of the past, just like (40) man.
(25) man is a thing of the past, just like (40) man.
umad?
/10chars
And let's not have giant spaces in our thread so everyone can see it. let's not make such a spammy post and adding /10chars to it. -Azshira
Last edited by Azshira; 2012-11-22 at 09:48 AM.
http://www.twitch.tv/hammerpairs 7/7 Mythic EN / 3/3 Mythic ToV / 10/10 Mythic NH / 9/9 Mythic ToS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBmNLMo4vcI some old school CM fun
"Your lights will go out. The darkness will envelop you. And you will fear the shadows that move within it."
10 man guild.... not a real guild
You know exactly what you said. -Azshira
Last edited by Azshira; 2012-11-22 at 09:47 AM.
Its like people think the raid setting will change the outcome of how good a guild actually works together, barring any outstanding bugs. Top guilds will be at the top because of dedication & teamwork, it has little to nothing to do with raid size or tuning. I can promise you if there was another guild with the same dedication & teamwork, you would be seeing more of them, but you don't because the quality & dedication of other guilds & their members is less then the top end.
To the people who are saying one size is easier then the other.. of course it will be if you actually oh I don't know, experience the fight before then do it on another setting because you have the insight & experience to do the fight better, then claim that it's *easier* because it finally clicked for your team.
So.... 25 man is more forgiving and let you carry people, but is still harder?
You seem to speak against yourself here imo
What you are saying is that in 10 man each player have to be better cause their effort counts more = 25 man is more slacky/easier.
OT: World first is world first Imo, but you should also give both "brackets" credit for world first in each form. Like somone mentioned earlier.... so the first of them all would get both overal first and their bracket first
I just enjoy looking at these threads to watch the people crying. 10m vs 25m threads make me laugh because it just flocks the want-to-be trolls.
Some fights are harder on 10HM, some fights are harder on 25HM; as Normal modes are not what top end players care about. The thing people fail to see is that most world 1st guilds in US/EU push to be 25m. That doesn't mean that 25m is always the hardest, it could be the case but not 100%. You have to look at time completed, which tier, which patch, what hotfix: stuff like that. Paragon released that HM Rag was a joke on 10HM; yes compared to 25HM after you had already completed it. You have the weapons from the hardest boss, then you do the boss again; you have the gear and the strat down already. The rest of the time is just perfecting it.
All in All; individual times of tiers will be different for difficulty for the bosses. Please stop doing these threads because it will just flock wanna-be trolls. Higher end guilds will try to make themselves see a little better by putting US 1st 25 Alliance Kill instead of US 15th or World 33rd. Makes it seem better for them. World 1st = First people in the world to complete something. If you want World first to be in one mode, then eliminate all other modes (but that will never happen).
[P] [85:Manintty-Sha]: like your pretty much a tank god
I used to be good at this game
Washed up Top 20 US player
Paragon is world fastest guild that has killed 3/4hc from terrace. I think they will get WF.
Off topic: Stop this 10vs25 shiaat
Whether you believe 10 man is harder, or 25 if harder, everyone can agree they are not the same difficulty on a fight-per-fight basis. Each bracket has its own worst first and has nothing to do with the other bracket.
If you actually do the math of when method and paragon got the patch and their kills compared to the US guilds, you'll see it actually took them longer.
Done.