Yeah you can't understand and I don't expect you to. Slavery isn't safer. It's just a different kind of violence, one that breeds dependency and empower victims rather than people capable and willing to act and thing for themselves. Tuck tail and run when one can actually fight for ones beliefs and ideas. Is what it sounds like to me.
And I can't believe anyone loves their family that would allow them to become slaves.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
No slacktivism is when you try to silence people you disagree with with dog piling and dishonest conversations about issues one is actually not DOING anything about. Say what you want but DeSantis and Trump supporters are mostly all supporters of the 2A and willing to fight for it legislatively and unify.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
I'm gonna take a minute to complain about how it was literally just one fuckin time and it didn't even work and like two decades later we're still doing that shit. I hate it when someone in front of you has some stank ass feet and shit, or goes without socks and clearly hasn't done as much as clipped their toenails in the better part of 3 years.
No one is being "silenced". If you can't handle criticism, you're not interested in open discussion nor do you support freedom of speech; you're seeking to shut down other people's freedom of speech because you don't want them contradicting you all the time.
That's not about defending freedom. That's you being fascistic. That's what the whole bullshit against "cancel culture" is; nascent fascism, an attempt to shut down speech that's critical of you and your ideas.
You also have absolutely fuck-all idea of what anyone here's doing in their own jurisdictions, so you can stop projecting your own ideological lethargy onto everyone else, thanks.
It's entirely relevant to your claim. Saying terrorists hate America for its freedom while supporting the post-9/11 surveillance state in order to catch said terrorists is the same argument as insisting that you oppose "slavery" while backing intrusive and draconian law enforcement in the name of "putting criminals in prison."
And in both cases it isn't actually about freedom, or even safety; it's about hurting the right people and flattering your ego.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
I mean, this is intentional at some level.
Incarcerate a lot of people and criminalize a lot of things and you keep crime rates up, which lets you justify feeding more money to the police in the name of "safety" even as those police become more and more militarized against the populace they were originally intended to protect, while keeping that same populace scared and willing to give up their freedom to the increasing authoritarianism because everything you say is fearmongering about crime over and over.
Choking off the working class forcing many to turn to crime as the only reasonable alternative they have is also feeding the same machine.
None of this is just a whopping big coincidence. It's intentional. Keep the citizenry stupid, poor, and scared shitless, and you can do anything you want in exploiting them for the benefit of those in power. With a strong jackbooted police force to act as personal security writ large for the same.
Sure they are dog poling echo chambers, trying to bully and force anyone who disagrees to play a fucking game rather than drop an opinion alone or go into long fucking discussions about their reasons when they specifically decline.
Honestly this kind of shit is par for the course, but this open discourse bullshit you said, is doing the exact opposite of anything productive.
- - - Updated - - -
I don't agree, and while it is authoritarian, I am alright not disarming everyone and leaving EVERYONE with the right to be armed.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis