The difference between us is that I argue shades of gray, whereas you argue black and white. I don't accuse you of making no sense and providing no arguments, because I'm not trying to prove an issue as something that's black and white. You fail to understand that. You keep trying to prove an issue as black and white, keep distorting my arguments, and overall keep making this a pointless conversation.
You, sir, have managed to teach me nothing useful today. Your entire reason for being here seems to be to win an internet argument.
You seem to have no clue about what's going on. But don't worry, you are not alone.
Islas Malvinas are a military strategic enclave, not only because of the oil, also because it's a solid base to control the gate to the Antartica, and let's not talk about the access from there to the rich area of South America, yeah rich in raw materials. It's one of the most important areas in the world, in terms of strategy.
Remember, Argentina is fighting over something that GB stole. It doesn't mean it should belong to Argentina since they are Isles... but let's get real, doesn't it remind you people to Gibraltar? It's in Spain, but the UK guys liked it on it's day basically for the same reason they like Malvinas/Falkland.
Last edited by yetgdhfgh; 2013-01-04 at 11:26 AM.
How do you steal something that had no inhabitants at the time of conquest, and had been abandoned by the people that had colonised them beforehand (note the usage of the past tense) for nearly 50 years because the islands have no natural resources on the surface, no means to grow crops in any usable amounts and are subject to the storms of the South Atlantic?Remember, Argentina is fighting over something that GB stole. It doesn't mean it should belong to Argentina since they are Isles... but let's get real, doesn't it remind you people to Gibraltar? It's in Spain, but the UK guys liked it on it's day basically for the same reason they like Malvinas/Falkland.
Argentina should get the islands. Their claim is a relic of a long dead age.
What is making me chuckle, are the few people claiming the UK only has an interest in the Falklands due to the "huge natural resources". What they seem to have forgotten (and it is all in the links to sources I provided in the OP) is that the UK defended the islands DESPITE THE FACT WE DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE OIL. The oil was discovered recently (as in, the last five years) and Argentina are heading down the same path again due to a poor economoy and wanting to distract their people from the horrible truth.
The fact there is now 60,000,000+ barrels of oil there will just mean we fight even harder should they invade again.
Didn't Argentina steal it from Spain anyway?
Besides, the people there want to remain under the British.
Nation bashing at its best I see.
Does repeating this make you guys feel better or is it a mantra? Maybe you think by repeating it every 5 seconds you will convince the world that it is true? Britain claimed the islands 150 years. They have no legal right to be there and a huge chunk of the "locals" are in and around the military base there.
Last edited by Cybran; 2013-01-04 at 11:38 AM.
No they didnt the falklands was inhabited before argentina became a country
There flimsy claim comes from some failed penal colony where the inmates rebelled and killed the commander then the british took control this was before the United provinces became argentina and before that the islands discovery has been contested by the dutch british french and spainish
Last edited by yetgdhfgh; 2013-01-04 at 11:34 AM.