41 year old man walks free as judge callls 13 year old a Predator

[medievalman1]

And where did I say "it's okay to rape if they're similar ages."

So what were you saying exactly? The male was developmentally challenged, not severely, but it was fairly obvious to any who met him. Oh yeah, the girl roughie'd him, actually saw the toxicology report.

Regardless, my comment was only regarding that simply being 13 years of age was no free pass to sinister deeds.

[Aristeus]

What I really hate about cases like this is that the link that was posted doesn't actually say anything about what happened. It's so focused on "How dare anyone suggest that a 13 year old girl could be a predator" that it doesn't give any details on the case at all. Is this a statutory rape case where it's only rape because of her age, which she deceived him about? Did he actually force himself upon her, which would be rape no matter the age or her actions? All sensationalism, no facts, makes Lynarii a sad poster.

It doesn't matter actually but.

Neil Wilson is 41 years old. He took a 13-year-old girl home, allowed her to strip and then engaged in what we must euphemistically refer to as a “sex act” with her. For this and other offences including the possession of eight images of child sexual abuse and eleven sexual images involving horses and dogs, he received an eight-month suspended sentence. But it’s not the lenience of the punishment that has pushed the case into the headlines. It's the comments of the prosecutor and judge.

This is what happened.

[AndaliteBandit]

Whether or not she was the aggressor, if "she wanted it" becomes a valid defense in cases of child molestation and rape, guess how many people accused of child molestation and rape are going to try and use that defense? All of them.

It doesn't matter if she was on her knees begging for it. She was the child, and he was the adult.

[Aristeus]

So what were you saying exactly? The male was developmentally challenged, not severely, but it was fairly obvious to any who met him. Oh yeah, the girl roughie'd him, actually saw the toxicology report.

Regardless, my comment was only regarding that simply being 13 years of age was no free pass to sinister deeds.

I was saying that it's possible for a 14year old girl to rape a 13 year old since they are similar in age and similar in body strength often times as the boy likely isn't very far along into puberty.

I was saying they are similar in age so it's easier to that to happen. This isn't the case with a 13 year old girl and a 41 year old man.

[Destruktion]

There is 0 blame on the younger.

"The 12 year old egged me on to have sex with her so.. I did, it's not my fault." <- Doesn't this sound ridiculous?

The bolded part is what sounds the most ridiculous, if the story is true.

[medievalman1]

I was saying that it's possible for a 14year old girl to rape a 13 year old since they are similar in age and similar in body strength often times as the boy likely isn't very far along into puberty.

I was saying they are similar to age so it's easier to that to happen then, this isn't the case with a 13 year old girl and a 41 year old man.

First off, I'll say that this 41 year old should not be excused for his actions. I do not have all the facts but at the very least he had sex with a minor and had child pornography on his computer, both of which are reprehensible. With that said, since we've agreed that a 13 year old is capable of heinous sexual acts, it then could easily be said that a 13 year old "victim" may not be entirely without fault. Again, without knowing the facts it makes things difficult to tell.

I suppose my main complaint with this topic/article/whatever is the partial focus on the age of the girl, a non-issue really.

[Aristeus]

The bolded part is what sounds the most ridiculous, if the story is true.

You are victim blaming...

- - - Updated - - -

First off, I'll say that this 41 year old should not be excused for his actions. I do not have all the facts but at the very least he had sex with a minor and had child pornography on his computer, both of which are reprehensible. With that said, since we've agreed that a 13 year old is capable of heinous sexual acts, it then could easily be said that a 13 year old "victim" may not be entirely without fault. Again, without knowing the facts it makes things difficult to tell.

I suppose my main complaint with this topic/article/whatever is the partial focus on the age of the girl, a non-issue really.

OH sure a 13 year old can rape someone, but raping a 41 year old man?

[Destruktion]

You are victim blaming...

Because maybe, and here's the crazy part, the victim deserves some of the blame in this particular case.

[Aristeus]

Because maybe, and here's the crazy part, the victim deserves some of the blame in this particular case.

If an 11 year old goes over and has sex with a 42 year old, you would blame the 11 year old who regrets it?

Okay glad we cleared that up.

[Destruktion]

If an 11 year old goes over and has sex with a 42 year old, you would blame the 11 year old who regrets it?

Okay glad we cleared that up.

The 11 year old regrets it, so any responsibility he/she carries for his/her actions is washed out?

[Aristeus]

The 11 year old regrets it, so any responsibility he/she carries for his/her actions is washed out?

Lmao, thank you for proving to me you are a victim blamer who supports adults sharing the blame with young, mentally under developed children. Bravo.

[AndaliteBandit]

'You knew she was not nearly 16, as she said, and your plea of guilty recognises that you knew.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-children.html

So there was no misunderstanding about her age. The 41-year old man admitted he knew she wasn't 16.

[Destruktion]

Lmao, thank you for proving to me you are a victim blamer who supports adults sharing the blame with young, mentally under developed children. Bravo.

I came here to have a discussion. What did you come here for?

[smelltheglove]

The 11 year old regrets it, so any responsibility he/she carries for his/her actions is washed out?

wait, wut? exactly how low does this bar go?

[AndaliteBandit]

The 11 year old regrets it, so any responsibility he/she carries for his/her actions is washed out?

The 11 year old never had the responsibility of that situation, so there is no responsibility to be washed out. If you are the adult, it is your responsibility not to have sex with a child. It really isn't that hard.

[Deleted]

The judge didn't actually call her a sexual predator if you read closely.


That is what feminist Caroline Criado-Perez accuses the judge of implying that the girl was a sexual predator by ruling that she egged the man on.


Nothing more than a glorified head turning title.


Nice to see the feminist card being played instead of the racist one though. Was starting to get bored with the race card waved about every other thread.

[Deleted]

Its a difficult time to be a teenager. Young boys are taught about respecting women, but there are images everywhere of half naked women that as a boy its practically impossible not to look at, and young girls are bombarded with images about how they should look and how they shoud act, that its not unreasonable to think that young teenagers are being pushed towards sexual maturity before they are ready.

For this case i think there is blame for both parties, but the man should have known better, and i believe should shoulder most of the blame here. How he didn't know she was 13 i don't understand.

[AndaliteBandit]

The judge didn't actually call her a sexual predator if you read closely.


That is what feminist Caroline Criado-Perez accuses the judge of implying that the girl was a sexual predator by ruling that she egged the man on.


Nothing more than a glorified head turning title.


Nice to see the feminist card being played instead of the racist one though. Was starting to get bored with the race card waved about every other thread.

'The girl is predatory in all her actions and she is sexually experienced. She appeared to look around 14 or 15'

Sounds like she was called a predator to me.

[Destruktion]

wait, wut? exactly how low does this bar go?

The 11 year old never had the responsibility of that situation, so there is no responsibility to be washed out. If you are the adult, it is your responsibility not to have sex with a child. It really isn't that hard.

Lol I don't support blaming an 11-year old in a case like that, that guy's just rubbing me the wrong way.

[AndaliteBandit]

For this case i think there is blame for both parties, but the man should have known better, and i believe should shoulder most of the blame here. How he didn't know she was 13 i don't understand.

He knew she wasn't 16.

'You knew she was not nearly 16, as she said, and your plea of guilty recognises that you knew.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-children.html

So there was no misunderstanding about her age. The 41-year old man admitted he knew she wasn't 16.