Republican Election 2016 - Donald Trump Megathread [OFFICIAL]

[Starscream101]

The way you chose to talk with your friends is fine, are you running for president of the united states? No? Then talk any way you want. When you run for president you can continue to talk that way but don't expect to actually win the white house, other people have some standards for behavior you know.
Yes, the problem has always been the PC nation *rolls eyes* or the party Donald is suppose to represent has always talked the big game about family values and bible lifestyles, which Trump has no chance of living up to.

God forbid some people out there don't go out of their way to be insulting to people not like them and not look favorably upon those who do. I know you guys think it is some kind of counter culture movement but it is a pretty shitty one.

When was this 2005 Do not think he was running for President back then. just like Hilary Clinton was not running back then but is now and all the things she has done and said. Lying under Oath, A murder And a Enabler for Bill Clinton and his Sexual Assaults and the Foundation of taking money for favors. They Both Need to Go. He may of been talking bull mess back then like guys do but She is all so worse by her actions the death's the lying and weapons dealing is worse than talking crap.

Both are Crap Horrible people one should be in Jail that is for sure and the other should be going to court.

[Drew79]

Let's be honest, even with Trump's cash that's probably the only way he gets women.

Paying for furniture probably takes the least amount of effort. If you had so much cash you couldn't spend it all in your life time, would you put in as much effort as the rest of us and try to romance?

In other words, its the same as buying sex. No work.

[Felya]

The rape case is nonsense. Trump is even more provably not attracted to little girls after this. He likes big fake tits. Just...a little too much, apparently. He can't help himself.

Couldn't resist:

https://youtu.be/4IrE6FMpai8

[Eviscero]

When was this 2005 Do not think he was running for President back then. just like Hilary Clinton was not running back then but is now and all the things she has done and said. Lying under Oath, A murder And a Enabler for Bill Clinton and his Sexual Assaults and the Foundation of taking money for favors. They Both Need to Go. He may of been talking bull mess back then like guys do but She is all so worse by her actions the death's the lying and weapons dealing is worse than talking crap.

Both are Crap Horrible people one should be in Jail that is for sure and the other should be going to court.

Slight difference between conspiracy theories perpetuated by know-nothing scum online with 0 evidence and VIDEO PROOF!

[Espe]

When was this 2005 Do not think he was running for President back then. just like Hilary Clinton was not running back then but is now and all the things she has done and said

Kind of hard to make sense of your unhinged rants but it seems like you're just spewing conspiracy theory garbage. Isn't that against the rules on mmoc?

[Renathras]

Wait, this is a thing?
Why is this a thing?

If it gins up millennial votes for Trump in swing states, it could help Clinton. If it doesn't, it doesn't matter.

Most of the people saying this is a big deal already weren't going to vote Trump, so they weren't part of his base nor were they undecided voters. Most of the people that (rightly) note things like how this is the type of thing many males say in all male, small groups, or point out that this is arguably true (that women tend to go for rich/famous and "confident" men), were already going to vote for Trump anyway. It was also 11 years ago - a time when most Americans opposed gay marriage and supported the Iraq War still, to give you an idea of the general climate of the nation at the time.

For undecided that are still undecided, this may nudge them further from voting for Trump, but in this bizzaroland election of roughly equal evils, that doesn't necessarily mean it nudges them towards voting for Clinton. If it turns moderates off of Trump, but DOESN'T turn them on to Clinton, than it's a wash that has no effect on the election anyway.

So, again, while this is a media firestorm right now - the same media that only about 6% of Americans believe is trustworthy and that many believe is in the pocket of the Democrat party and Clinton election machine - will this actually alter the election dynamics? Probably not a lot.

All that those religious types debating not voting for Trump have to be reminded of is Clinton picking Supreme Court Justices that will force them to pay for abortions and have gay weddings at their churches and they'll likely reluctantly vote for Trump. If it wasn't for the Supreme Court, a lot more people would be willing to vote Ckinton or at least not vote Trump, but a progressive-authoritarian SCotUS supermajority is a surprisingly terrifying thing to a lot of conservatives. Indeed, that's probably a strong reason Trump has had such a stubbornly high persistent floor.

And talking about women in this way - 11 YEARS ago at that - isn't likely going to turn off his white working class make voters, or even the few working class Minority voters he has picked up. It just isn't an issue to these people when things like TPP, free trade, an erosion of manufacturing jobs in the US, lowering real wages, and feelings that the Democrat party has declared open season on them are in play.

Again, most of the people this is an issue to are people that already were Clinton supporters.
And the media. But I repeat myself there.

Most people that were already going to hold their nose and vote Trump are still going to, and most people that are inconsistent at his "deplorable"-mess already weren't going to. This may not even move the needle that much.

Sunday's debate and how he handles it, though...as they say, it's usually the coverup (or reaction/PR/failure of PR) that is damning, not the scandals themselves.

And then we have the wikileaks document dump on Clinton's speeches to the big banks, which - again - only matters to people that have already made their minds up.

[Eviscero]

I wouldn't have sex with someone who was only doing it for monetary gains in the first place.

Oh man, sex for furniture is even better than sex for car repairs, if you can believe it...

[Breccia]

Most of the people that (rightly) note things like how this is the type of thing many males say in all male

Did you just claim many males brag about that sort of thing? Adultery?

And that's rightly?

[Espe]

note things like how this is the type of thing many males say in all male, small groups

Maybe they do things differently in Texas but around here "males" don't brag about raping women. What he said definitely isn't considered "normal" by any sense of the word.

[Drew79]

I wouldn't have sex with someone who was only doing it for monetary gains in the first place.

Desperate people do desperate things. I'm happy you have your life together.

Watch this movie. Indecent Proposal, Robert Redford would be Trump.

Can't insert video with my low post count.

[Garnier Fructis]

Couldn't resist:

https://youtu.be/4IrE6FMpai8

[Chingylol]

The fact that my hardcore Republican aunt who has two Trump signs on her lawn and shares Killary/libtard memes almost everyday just made a post on FB that she's very upset about what Trump said, shows that this is going to do alot of damage to his campaign especially when it comes to independents. She'll still vote for him, but if something like this rattles her, then people who still haven't decided who to vote for... well, this pretty much seals the deal.

It's basically damage equal to Romney's 47% remark, and we all know how that turned out.

[Starscream101]

Kind of hard to make sense of your unhinged rants but it seems like you're just spewing conspiracy theory garbage. Isn't that against the rules on mmoc?

Slight difference between conspiracy theories perpetuated by know-nothing scum online with 0 evidence and VIDEO PROOF!

You mean all those people that died because of the arms deals in Libya that she enable. And the foundation is know to take favors. And the Lying under Oath The Email's, What she said about those women are on Tape and Record, She is no saint she try's to act like.

They Both should not be on the Ticket Both are very bad people To much stuff about both of them that is UNFIT to be President.

It is damn sad that one of them is going to be Elected as President.

[Eviscero]

The fact that my hardcore Republican aunt who has two Trump signs on her lawn and shares Killary/libtard memes almost everyday just made a post on FB that she's very upset about what Trump said, shows that this is going to do alot of damage to his campaign especially when it comes to independents. She'll still vote for him, but if something like this rattles her, then people who still haven't decided who to vote for... well, this pretty much seals the deal.

It's basically damage equal to Romney's 47% remark, and we all know how that turned out.

Someone needs to ______ your aunt by the ________.

[DeadmanWalking]

Wait, this is a thing?
Why is this a thing?

If it gins up millennial votes for Trump in swing states, it could help Clinton. If it doesn't, it doesn't matter.

Most of the people saying this is a big deal already weren't going to vote Trump, so they weren't part of his base nor were they undecided voters. Most of the people that (rightly) note things like how this is the type of thing many males say in all male, small groups, or point out that this is arguably true (that women tend to go for rich/famous and "confident" men), were already going to vote for Trump anyway. It was also 11 years ago - a time when most Americans opposed gay marriage and supported the Iraq War still, to give you an idea of the general climate of the nation at the time.

For undecided that are still undecided, this may nudge them further from voting for Trump, but in this bizzaroland election of roughly equal evils, that doesn't necessarily mean it nudges them towards voting for Clinton. If it turns moderates off of Trump, but DOESN'T turn them on to Clinton, than it's a wash that has no effect on the election anyway.

So, again, while this is a media firestorm right now - the same media that only about 6% of Americans believe is trustworthy and that many believe is in the pocket of the Democrat party and Clinton election machine - will this actually alter the election dynamics? Probably not a lot.

All that those religious types debating not voting for Trump have to be reminded of is Clinton picking Supreme Court Justices that will force them to pay for abortions and have gay weddings at their churches and they'll likely reluctantly vote for Trump. If it wasn't for the Supreme Court, a lot more people would be willing to vote Ckinton or at least not vote Trump, but a progressive-authoritarian SCotUS supermajority is a surprisingly terrifying thing to a lot of conservatives. Indeed, that's probably a strong reason Trump has had such a stubbornly high persistent floor.

And talking about women in this way - 11 YEARS ago at that - isn't likely going to turn off his white working class make voters, or even the few working class Minority voters he has picked up. It just isn't an issue to these people when things like TPP, free trade, an erosion of manufacturing jobs in the US, lowering real wages, and feelings that the Democrat party has declared open season on them are in play.

Again, most of the people this is an issue to are people that already were Clinton supporters.
And the media. But I repeat myself there.

Most people that were already going to hold their nose and vote Trump are still going to, and most people that are inconsistent at his "deplorable"-mess already weren't going to. This may not even move the needle that much.

Sunday's debate and how he handles it, though...as they say, it's usually the coverup (or reaction/PR/failure of PR) that is damning, not the scandals themselves.

And then we have the wikileaks document dump on Clinton's speeches to the big banks, which - again - only matters to people that have already made their minds up.

Lol, did you forget there are other people in the Republican party besides you? People with morals and standards? Conservative and evangelical women will not accept this behavior from their candidate. Why do you think Jennifer Flowers was not sitting in the audience even though she said she would come? Because Trumps cabinet know that these women do not react kindly to the ideal of parading out someone's mistress or using a mistress to rattle a wife. Do you even know who the people in your candidates party are? You are so out of touch.

[Breccia]

Every single newspaper and magazine that endorsed Trump is going to have to write a carefully worded apoloHAHAHAHHA just kidding, he never got any. And after this, I don't see how he will, either.

I'd say this would put a dent in his prep time for the debates, but there wasn't any of that, either. But for someone who doesn't like to admit losing, this is going to at least break his concentration.

[Drew79]

How the fuck do you consider Trump to be anything like that? You think Trump asks these women's husbands for permission to pursue them and buy them shit in hopes he gets laid?

No, from what he said in the video, he is like the woman's "friend" and tries to get the woman behind their man's back. I recommend not doing that, because a mad man can shoot you.

[Breccia]

Lol, did you forget there are other people in the Republican party besides you? People with morals and standards?

And also Ted Cruz?

[Espe]

They Both should not be on the Ticket Both are very bad people

It fine if you believe that but you have no evidence and posting conspiracy theories is against the forum rules.

Unhinged conservative conspiracies aside I'm still not seeing how that changes the fact that Trump is on record bragging about being a sexual predator.

[Eviscero]

Every single newspaper and magazine that endorsed Trump is going to have to write a carefully worded apoloHAHAHAHHA just kidding, he never got any. And after this, I don't see how he will, either.

I'd say this would put a dent in his prep time for the debates, but there wasn't any of that, either. But for someone who doesn't like to admit losing, this is going to at least break his concentration.

IF Trump decides to go through with the debate (I seriously wouldn't be surprised if he's suddenly 'sick') all Clinton needs to do is walk out and hold her hand over her crotch when he goes to shake her hand. Make it happen Hillary!