Nope, that is only for losers - like Hillary.
- - - Updated - - -
How is that ironic? How does leaving off the "s'" on thinks have anything to do with reading comprehension? Bad typing? Yes. Lack of proof reading? Maybe. Lack of comprehension? LOL - sure thing.
That's okay, you folks can excoriate me all you want over a typo and not proofreading, more than okay with that.
Ransath says "What?" more times than Jack Burton.
LOL - that was actually pretty funny!
BTW - there is not getting lunch for you. You are PERMANENTLY out to lunch, and constantly have it handed to you as well
- - - Updated - - -
Really? Please point out the specific:
Ransath "I never said that!"
Skroe *links quote*
Ransath "You're serially and flagrantly ignorant!"
Please point out what I actually "said", and then "denied". I can't help it that people like you and Crowes fail at reading comprehension - or better yet, you read something, then use your unhinged bias to draw an incorrect and delusional conclusion, and then reply as if your incorrect assumption is fact.
Check me out....Im └(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┐└(-.-)┐ Dancing, Im └(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┐└(-.-)┐ Dancing.
My Gaming PC: MSI Trident 3 - i7-10700F - RTX 4060 8GB - 32GB DDR4 - 1TB M.2SSD
Well, I hope that clears it up.
OT: I wonder how easy that interview actually went because you can be pretty assured talking to Mueller's team that it won't get out in the public so no reason not to sing like a canary. It will only get easier to turn the screws as time goes on.
Last edited by xChurch; 2017-10-14 at 07:40 PM.
Appreciate your interpretation, but....
What I meant was I remember when Obama nominated (to use the correct word) her - and the reason I remember it was specifically for the fact that Bolton was against her. I could have phrased the sentence better, but I can see why it was misinterpreted.
Read back my sentence now, with that clarification.