Time Warner wanted to add data caps, but the FCC stoped them, under net neutrality rules. So expect data caps regardless of what Comcast does.
https://www.recode.net/2016/4/25/115...band-data-caps
Time Warner wanted to add data caps, but the FCC stoped them, under net neutrality rules. So expect data caps regardless of what Comcast does.
https://www.recode.net/2016/4/25/115...band-data-caps
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning.
-Kujako-
http://hudsonvalleynewsnetwork.com/2...open-internet/
New York Democratic Representative Patrick Maloney introduces a bill which would stop the FCC from killing Net Neutrality.
Is there anything I can do to show support for NN?
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning.
-Kujako-
I Tweeted my ISP, and they said they support NN.
I live in a fairly large suburb of Chicago (population of the suburb alone over 50k), solidly upper middle class area, so it's not a wealth or population limited area. All I have available are Comcast and AT&T and AT&T maxes at 25Mbps which is barely considered broadband these days. I pretty much have no option other than Comcast.
I take online college classes. How will this affect them?
This is bizarrely delusional.
They don't have to support it. They have a monopoly, and the internet is a necessary service, hence its classification as a utility. They have you bent over a barrel, and you have to take what they offer you at the price they give it to you.
It's not size of your locality that dictates how many ISPs you have. It is the ISPs. They actively work to avoid competing with one another, because they view it as cost prohibitive to build networks in another ISP's territory. That was precisely the argument they used when explaining to the government why there would be no loss of competition if one giant ISP absorbed another. I live in one of the biggest metro areas in the country and I have a "choice" between two ISPs, DSL and cable, and let's not pretend DSL is broadband.
The more you post, the more painfully obvious it becomes that you don't actually engage in normal society like the rest of us. This is the stuff just us measly peasant class folks have to deal with, I suppose.
Important differences between organic food and NN:
1) ISP services present a so-called natural monopoly, due to their high initial cost of entering a new market. Organic food can simply be sent to retailers in a new town at a relatively low cost. Entering a towns cable market is much more costly and thus needs a high expected payoff. However, since one cannot just set up a sample ISP there, knowing whether or not a new ISP in town will be competitive is hard to gauge beforehand.
2) Consumers face relatively high costs changing ISPs (new hardware possibly, but due to low competition in 1) it usually involves moving outright if you want to change ISP). Changing from non-organic to organic food only has the price difference and possibly having to go to another store, unless it is not offered in a town. But it is more likely to be available than a different ISP due to point 1)
3) Monopolies on the market are supported by the US government
4) ISPs do not create the content that makes their product desirable. ISPs are not food providers. They are the retail stores where you have to buy your food.