Do women only want for their partners to be taller or it's ok if they are shorter???

[Vargur]

So like this guy? I think he is 6'7 or 6'9?

Is he missing a leg? Seems like he is.

Anyway, if I had a choice, and I don't since I'm a dumbass, most of the time I'd very much rather choose the taller woman over the shorter one.
I'm 1.90m (6.2).

[Martymark]

Women don't want a short man.
Men don't want a fat woman.

One of these things can't be fixed with a little effort.

[Elim Garak]

No nothing changes with my rebuttal because it’s a fucking stupid made up premise.

I agree. Your rebuttal is exactly that. You just managed to use TOO many words to say what I left in the quote.

Women always go for the best provider, regardless of height. Height only becomes a criterion when there are two rich guys in the pen.
Going for the best provider because women need a provider to support them while they are pregnant and raising kids (that's basically what love is for women). Millions of years of evolution instilled that in our genes, because thanks to natural selection women who went with a wimp lost heir offspring to a sabre-tooth mammoth or something. So only those who chose "right" survived and passed on the genes that caused them to be attracted to "proper" mates, and obviously the "proper" mates passed on their genes.

But then a sociological shift happened and natural selection took a new form - social selection. Now the best provider is not the tallest strongest hunter.
So women marry another kind of "proper" mates. But their biology still compels them to want big tall males, sexually. Hence all the women who marry rich uglies - cheat on them with gardeners and tennis instructors - and often have children from them which they say are from their husbands.

The cycle continues.

I'm pretty sure if you are not filthy rich, you were most certainly not your wife's first choice.

[The One Percent]

Of course they do. Why do you think every generations average height gets slightly taller and taller?

[NihilSustinet]

The title says it all.

Do women care about how tall are their partners, AKA shorter than them???

would you mind if they are, let's say, 5'8 and you are 6'0???

"women" arent a hivemind. stop generalizing.

- - - Updated - - -

Women don't want a short man.
Men don't want a fat woman.

One of these things can't be fixed with a little effort.

whoa there. more generalizing. plenty of men like big women.

[Martymark]

whoa there. more generalizing. plenty of men like big women.

And plenty of women like midgets. Most don't though.

[NihilSustinet]

And plenty of women like midgets. Most don't though.

maybe so, which is why i said to stop generalizing.

[Azmoden]

It's more about the width... of your wallet.

Oh do they like that width.

[Fojos]

Well... as a guy, i can just talk about the many females i have talked in DR, and they, mostly, prefer tall guys, but... i also have a friend that its quite small and have gone out with many of those women that say they "want only tall men", so... yeah, if you know how to talk with them, its not much of a problem.

What you're saying is just that women don't know what they want.

[BuckSparkles]

What you're saying is just that women don't know what they want.

Have you ever asked one what they want to eat for dinner?

[Deleted]

Same question.

Women are more picky, it's required for natural selection. Women select mates, not men.

You're aware we have evolved since 10000 BC

[Elim Garak]

You're aware we have evolved since 10000 BC

I have some shocking news for you. We have evolved since SEVERAL MILLION years. And no, we haven't evolved since 10000 BC. We are still pretty much the same, 99%.

Although I don't get your point.

[Stop Pretending]

Yes. All women want tall guys. I have personally asked all 3.5 billion women, to bring you the answer.

Ironically all of them told you no, they won't have sex with you.

[Deleted]

I have some shocking news for you. We have evolved since SEVERAL MILLION years. And no, we haven't evolved since 10000 BC. We are still pretty much the same, 99%.

Although I don't get your point.

I know you don't because you don't understand human behaviour or biology

[Elim Garak]

I know you don't because you don't understand human behaviour or biology

Bold non-argument.

[Shaderas]

No. That's a load of bullshit. Height has more to do overall with nutrition than it has with genetics. Also, that's not how evolution works.

I thought it had to do with the amount of Human Growth Hormone (HGH) that was present during your growing years, and how your body utilized it.

[Deleted]

Bold non-argument.

That seems your default answer whenever your stupidity is pointed out, continue on embarrassing yourself

[Elim Garak]

That seems your default answer whenever your stupidity is pointed out, continue on embarrassing yourself

No, it's my default answer to point out stupidity whenever someone resorts to ad hominem or other logical fallacies.

[Doctor Amadeus]

I agree. Your rebuttal is exactly that. You just managed to use TOO many words to say what I left in the quote.

Women always go for the best provider, regardless of height. Height only becomes a criterion when there are two rich guys in the pen.
Going for the best provider because women need a provider to support them while they are pregnant and raising kids (that's basically what love is for women). Millions of years of evolution instilled that in our genes, because thanks to natural selection women who went with a wimp lost heir offspring to a sabre-tooth mammoth or something. So only those who chose "right" survived and passed on the genes that caused them to be attracted to "proper" mates, and obviously the "proper" mates passed on their genes.

But then a sociological shift happened and natural selection took a new form - social selection. Now the best provider is not the tallest strongest hunter.
So women marry another kind of "proper" mates. But their biology still compels them to want big tall males, sexually. Hence all the women who marry rich uglies - cheat on them with gardeners and tennis instructors - and often have children from them which they say are from their husbands.

The cycle continues.

I'm pretty sure if you are not filthy rich, you were most certainly not your wife's first choice.

Again you are conflating two things that have nothing to do with one another. It's real simple if a blind man walks into a wall and turns to walk the other way, that isn't fucking genetics, or his DNA, that is him making a choice based on the information available.

Your cells react in a similar way, and your DNA and RNA are the walls.


A woman chooses what is best for her or maybe she doesn't many women don't actually give a shit about offspring, they are considering other factors, some of which if I mentioned I would get an infraction for but some have hit on.

That doesn't have shit to do with natural selection, serious give up the nonsense and come back to reality. The problem here isn't just that you are wrong, it's that you are wrong about shit you wouldn't have to be.


Natural Selection and Evolution tied only in their function not their end results. As I said unless it's about faith. That is on you.

- - - Updated - - -

That seems your default answer whenever your stupidity is pointed out, continue on embarrassing yourself

Hey now have him explain to you how your preferences are the result of natural selection and evolution.

[Hctaz]

Some of you dudes have a weird concept of what you think women want. Like, I get this is mostly just from dudes creating an echo chamber of ideas and not listening to women, but I expect more of the internet.

Tell us what women want. Tell us the seeeeecret.