From the front page:
"Solo Queue is unlikely to be in Battle for Azeroth." -- What a good start.
"If you could solo queue, it would blur the distinction between ranked PvP and regular PvP." -- Yes, that's the effect as well as the intent. So?
"In other games that have solo queue, there is a lot more flexibility to change your composition. WoW isn't nearly as flexible." -- Woah. That's your excuse? And what's stopping you from providing flexibility to change your composition if you are talking about arenas? And why is this a factor at all in BGs which are mass-matched?
"Solo queue would produce a frustrating experience." -- Really? How so? This starts to seem like "You think you do but you don't".
"Playing with partners adds a lot of depth and social interaction." -- Wow. Who'd have thought. But similarly to how there are pros, there are cons to playing with partners, no? Maybe that's why people have been asking for solo queue in the first place, because of those cons? And maybe because those cons heavily outweigh the pros for 99% of the players, maybe that's why solo queue outscales team queue by a factor of 50 to 1 everywhere? No?
"The team would like to make it easier and more accessible to get into these rated PvP formats." -- Gee, what was it that you said about solo queue blurring the distinction between rated and unrated?
Cool Q&A, bro.
It's a complete clusterfuck of nonsense and handwaving. You want to say "no, we aren't going to do solo queue (because we didn't plan on doing it because we don't care and you will pay anyway)" and are simply trying to justify not doing it. It sure as heck would have been better if you just said nothing, at least saying nothing wouldn't have been intellectually insulting.