i wonder what goes on in these peoples mind that the most important part of committing a crime is recording it, presumably with the intention to put it on social media.
i wonder what goes on in these peoples mind that the most important part of committing a crime is recording it, presumably with the intention to put it on social media.
As someone in the UK, I really think were better off with sharia law, too many retards around.
we can do without the acid attacks and rape gangs though
Either find a quote where I say they deserve that or stop making shit up. All I have said is that they had police protection when they were in custody, they chose to bail themselves out and now they want priority protection from the police. Why should tax payers money go towards to priority protection for these scumbags, if they are scared then don't go out, society will be better for it. It's very rare for outraged citizens to actually form mobs and ransack peoples houses.
- - - Updated - - -
What does that say about the death sentence in countries that still allow it then?
Are people that support the death sentence sociopaths? What about the family of the deceased that watch the murderers execution, are they sociopaths? You are extending the definition of a sociopath to seemingly include any and all violent acts regardless of reason. If someone breaks into your house and threatens your family, are you a sociopath for pushing them downstairs rather than call the police and wait for justice to be met? A sociopath is someone who has no conscience, someone who feels no remorse or guilt for their actions whether that be lying, stealing, cheating or attacking, its not just any violent person.
I’m against the death penalty and don’t think it should be a thing in any country that plays at being civil. Jail should be soly about rehabilitation any one who can be rehabilitated should and released back into society. Thoses who can’t shouldnt be released. Sentencing as a whole should be changed if you ask me puting some one in jail for a year or two is worthless if they come out unchanged or worse they should be given every thing possible to turn there life around but if they are unwilling to do so they should stay in till they are.
- - - Updated - - -
Do you think lashing some one bloody is just a violent act? Do you think it’s equal to self defense? If you think some one should be punished in such a way you either truly think it is something that will work like derp does or you want it done because you take joy out of it and have no remorse or guilt about it being done.
Sounds less like "police protection" and more she called and they told her to call into a particular station if a threat presented itself, in which case they would come. In which case they're about as well protected in an immediate sense as any other citizen.
yes, and nobody (especially not young idiot kids) ever changes or regrets what they do.
- - - Updated - - -
yes
it's called a JUSTICE system not a vengeance system. vengeance is never fair, and it's never just.What about the family of the deceased that watch the murderers execution, are they sociopaths? You are extending the definition of a sociopath to seemingly include any and all violent acts regardless of reason. If someone breaks into your house and threatens your family, are you a sociopath for pushing them downstairs rather than call the police and wait for justice to be met? A sociopath is someone who has no conscience, someone who feels no remorse or guilt for their actions whether that be lying, stealing, cheating or attacking, its not just any violent person.
it's totally understandable if you want to see someone who did you wrong punished, and a completely human thing to feel. but that's precisely why you're not the appropriate agent to carry out the judgement.
as to the OP:
there's nothing wrong with the police protecting criminals until judgement is passed on them.
if they just let everyone murder each other because "Hey they're criminals" then we'd arrive at anarchy pretty quickly.
Last edited by shaunika123; 2018-08-01 at 09:18 PM.
Thirty or so years ago they'd have that shit beaten out of them, problem solved. I blame liberalism.
You're not a "young kid" at 16. You're two years away from being trusted enough to elect public officials, buying firearms and go to prison, and in some places you're old enough to handle a multiton chunk of metal at 85 mph. Being 16 is not an excuse. If you haven't figured out not to abuse and humiliate people in public - and have the gall to pose for photos, you're probably not going to get it - and frankly, you're just a waste of space.