Originally Posted by
CryotriX
You started this topic great, and continued it in the same manner with other examples of political cartoons, including the MBS/Trump one. Don't just go back on it now when it comes to other cases. If it's satire, and not clear propaganda, it's just that. There are plenty of stereotypes in your examples too. The real question is "are they depictions of bigotry" or are they created to incite hate against specific racial groups, genders and so on. The Serena cartoon fails at that, in fact, the Trump ones are actually more suspect of it than the tennis caricature. The "all powerful Jewish influence" , the hooked "Arab nose", the association with Islamic garb, the money, all of these can be considered - if you want to! - as bigoted stereotypes.
Yet all they are, in the end, are satirical depictions of REALITY, nothing else, with the help of some stereotypes. They're not meant to incite hatred. They're meant to mock, or raise awareness of something that is worth the risk, for example the Israel influence in the US that nobody dares question (good job here, brave, no sarcasm), of which the anti-BDS laws are proof, and something that the freespeech warriors should be up in arms against (yeah, sure, lol). Or the Saudi-US "friendship", resulting in Saudi access to modern weaponry and their continued genocide in Yemen and a legitimization of their human rights abuses, with such public mockeries as positions in the UNHRC:
"UN Watch executive director Hillel Neuer said: "It is scandalous that the UN chose a country that has beheaded more people this year [2015] than ISIS to be head of a key human rights panel. Petro-dollars and politics have trumped human rights." Saudi Arabia also shut down criticism, during the UN meeting. In January 2016, Saudi Arabia executed the prominent Shia cleric Sheikh Nimr who had called for free elections in Saudi Arabia."