So you're contesting that Winnie the Pooh is an inherently political entity and therefore deserves to be forbidden in China?
Because it sounds to me like the thin-skinned president and his political cronies took a joke aimed at disparaging his appearance way too far and took it out on a cartoon bear.
Can you imagine being even more sensitive than Donald Trump? It'd be like Donald Trump forbidding the sale of Cheetos; something you, apparently, feel would be a right and justified thing.
The ban is silly. It makes China look silly. It makes the president of China look silly. It makes the rest of the world go "Really? What a bunch of morons." It reinforces the notion that any and all political dissidence, no matter how paltry and petty, is met with extreme overreaction, because they're afraid that their grip is so tenuous that something as stupid as Winnie the Pooh could lead to their downfall.
It's what people that aren't confident in their rule do.
Which I mean I guess makes sense for China; they've always had a tumultuous political climate. Hell they changed political hands within living memory; they could do it again. But you know what they say; A person often meets his destiny on the road he took to avoid it
"shown by several researches"It doesn't need that, if you want to change things you can democratically change that. The only place where civil obedience is needed is in the west because the people have no voice there as has been shown by several researches.
Are any of them... credible? You seem to use that sentence a lot but never verify them.
And no, I don't consider "China considers China to be the most bestest place ever" or "Communism Today rates China A-okay" to be credible.
Uh huh.I'm sorry dude, science says YOU are the undemocratic ones.
At least I can go buy Winnie the Pooh merchandise whenever I please.