Couldn't possibly because there is an issue with the behavior of a prominent number of said supporters, could it.
"Don't question it, but if you do it didn't happen, and if it did happen it was your fault."
This is the summary of the responses to criticism of the behavior of Bernie's more vocal supporters. Notice how it's indistinguishable the shit an abusive partner says.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
Not only do I hope more states ditch caucuses after this, but also Iowa going first. It's always been flat out dumb. States should be divided into several groups with a rotation of which group votes first.
Bloomberg's twitter is on fire tonight. https://twitter.com/Mike2020
He's really gunning for Trump. Nice to see people actually attacking Trump on a visceral level.
More ads like this!
Would Bernie turn down Bloomberg's help?
Government Affiliated Snark
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
Calm down nancy, I never said I would vote for him. I wont decide for months.
I just appreciate seeing good attack adds on Trump. Bernie likes to shit on billionaires and "oligarchs". Would BErnie turn down assistance from Bloomberg to maintain his populist purity?
Ironically, Bloomberg has won larger votes than Bernie. Bloomberg is not afraid of the NRA either.
Government Affiliated Snark
I'm telling you, that is how it is. And I'm also telling you, get the fuck out and change it then.
Blissful ignorance isn't an excuse to complain at the last minute.
Are you talking about the US Founders? The ones that denied women and slaves the right to vote?
Maybe the Greeks? Who similarly didn't enfranchise a considerable portion of their population?
Or someone else?
Different, not necessarily more "oligarchic". The EC has nothing to do with an oligarchy, for example, but it's most assuredly not a direct democracy, either.
Again, this is the kind of very basic, foundational stuff that shouldn't be confusing. And that many in the progressive wing even find this "kids pool" out of their depth should be a cause to inform and educate themselves, not get angry.
I haven't seen anyone fully "defend" this other than, "This is how it's always been, and this isn't some grand conspiracy against Sanders."
People have mocked the coin tosses for decades. Again, Sanders supporters are just decades late to this party and acting like this is all brand new. It ain't, this is old hat, and people have complained about it mocked it the whole time.
I don't know, ask the Iowa Legislature and state level parties. It's up to them.
Dude, the only "new" bit is the app, which pretty much everyone agreed was a terrible idea as soon as the news broke. The rest of your post seems like some sort of generic rant and I'm not sure how to even respond.
How did you get to that from what i said? I could give two fucks about what the standard 3 podcast white boys weekly says. its clear thier followers are what you are sad about. Some 16 year old is dunking on you and then you say things like 'I'm starting to change my mind about wanting them to have accessible healthcare.' dont let the mask slip. I guess its because bros making podcast money are your peer competition in people roleplaying the left. Your entire discourse so far is crying about some dopey podcasters that nobody who isnt extremely online gives a shit about.
Dude, there's no way in a million years Bloomberg would support Sanders. The entire fucking reason Bloomberg is running is because Biden is weak and he was afraid of Sanders or Warren getting the nomination.
He's not running to beat Trump, he's running to beat progressives.