Mega-Thread: Impeachment Proceedings & Inquiry of Trump

[Draco-Onis]

It is. I read it. And before you spew the leftist propaganda about how it's the redacted version, keep in mind that the version available to the public was released with the Ukrainian president's approval. If he felt strong-armed, don't you think he'd approve the version that proves it?

Your honor why was the hostage doing what my client wanted I mean he had a gun pointed at his head but him doing it obviously means he wasn't a hostage

[Endus]

And none of you leftists ever have any good arguments so you resort to slander. I also never defended Trump. If you're going to reply, at least understand what you're replying to first.

It is. I read it. And before you spew the leftist propaganda about how it's the redacted version . . .

I have literally never seen anyone openly and freely use the term "leftist", who wasn't a far-right type themselves. You're letting your supposed centrist mask slip.

Name one thing I made up. Meanwhile news networks spin events the way they want the public to view them every day.

The idea that there's any kind of "media conspiracy" is entirely in your own head, for one.

Nothing you've provided has anything to do with the impeachment inquiry. Biden's not relevant to that discussion, no matter how badly Trump and his supporters want to derail. The media focusing on Trump, here, is not some "conspiracy", it's reporting current events, which is their duty.

[Cockus Maximus]

Hunter Biden wasn’t on the board being investigated until 2014.

So you’re a sheep, a liar, or just insane.

Like I said. Time travel is the only way this conspiracy theory makes sense.

- - - Updated - - -



Hunter Biden wasn’t on the board being investigated until 2014.

So you’re a sheep, a liar, or just insane.


Time travel needed. Also, Biden wasn’t Vice President until 2008.

So your conspiracy theory requires that Biden be voce president in 2006. And that he stopped an investigation that had been dormant for year.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...-s-biden-claim

Btw, source for hunter getting millions of dollars in 2006?

A YouTube video with no sources doesn’t count. I can make a YouTube video that says you’re a repitilian.

Great source, I read the whole thing. Even your own source states that one Ukrainian official claims Biden's son is unrelated to the investigation, while the official doing the actual investigation claims that Biden's son was the very reason he was fired. Who to trust? We don't and can't know for sure, hence the need for an investigation. However, considering your source also states that both Biden and his son declined to comment, it seems as if they are distancing themselves from any claims since they know if an investigation does continue they'd be found guilty. So based purely on them both declining to comment, I'm leaning toward believing the investigator on this.

As for the youtube video, you can disregard the text at the beginning. I didn't make the video, so for all I know it could've been a typo for 2016. The point of the video is that Biden admits himself to strong-arming Ukraine. For what purpose? We need an investigation to find out.

Anyway I know there are a lot more leftists clamoring for my attention, but it's 5PM here in NYC and I'm leaving the office so I don't have time to indulge everyone unfortunately. Since your post was the only one that had anything worth debating, congrats! You're the winner of my reply

[draynay]

I don't know why Rozz bothers with the warnings if people just ignore them and insist on derailing the thread.

[Xyonai]

I don't know why Rozz bothers with the warnings if people just ignore them and insist on derailing the thread.

Because they've managed to get away with it up until this point and a lotta folks can't help but get jebaited by shitposters.

[Thekri]

Your honor why was the hostage doing what my client wanted I mean he had a gun pointed at his head but him doing it obviously means he wasn't a hostage

Why are you guys still responding to RDA?

[Zaydin]

Actually I don't watch Fox News. Half of my family does and while I don't despise them for it, I wonder how they could actually believe any of their propaganda at face value. I guess a lot of people have no concept of independent thought on this forum.

Of course nothing was found against Biden's son... Biden literally got the prosecutor in charge of investigating him fired by threatening to withhold aid.

Let me guess: You are another 'woke independent' who doesn't support Trump and it's just sheer coincidence that you defend Trump and repeat his talking points.

[Breccia]

Mike Pompeo just got subpeonaed by 3 committees in regards to documents and Rudy Giuliani.

Matter of time. Sorry, but you can't just say "I'm putting Giuliani on the phone, Mr. Foreign Leader" and expect the head of the State Dept to skate by unnoiticed. And that's ignoring everything Giuliani said on the topic, which includes the phrase "it was documented".

[Felya]

Name one thing I made up. Meanwhile news networks spin events the way they want the public to view them every day.

All of it... if your information doesn’t come from news, it comes from your imagination. Since you are not omnipresent... Your rationale is countered by a super simple question... What’s your source?

- - - Updated - - -

Let me guess: You are another 'woke independent' who doesn't support Trump and it's just sheer coincidence that you defend Trump and repeat his talking points.

I’m betting this is QAnon... we just don’t understand numerology...

[Jehct]

All of it... if your information doesn’t come from news, it comes from your imagination. Since you are not omnipresent... Your rationale is countered by a super simple question... What’s your source?

- - - Updated - - -



I’m betting this is QAnon... we just don’t understand numerology...

You know C-Span is a non-biased thing right?

[nonameelf]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXA--dj2-CY

enjoy

Who was president in 2006 again?

This is probably one of the laziest conspiracy theories I've ever seen. I thought conspiracy theories are not allowed here.

[cubby]

A new Hill-HarrisX survey on Friday found support for impeachment proceedings against President Trump has risen 12 points compared to a similar poll conducted three months ago.

Do they do a different impeachment poll every 3 month's? i mean it sounds ridiculous when i think about it like that.

Normally that would. But this is the time of Resident Trump. He's made the ridiculous commonplace.

[Shadowferal]

Why are you guys still responding to RDA?

huh...That does make sense...

[Poopymonster]

Why are you guys still responding to RDA?

Is that who Cuckus Maximus is?

[Skroe]

Why are you guys still responding to RDA?

I thought rda quit the forums forever under penalty of paying everyone $50 or something.

[Felya]

You know C-Span is a non-biased thing right?

Me? I’m not the one asserting news is all biased.

- - - Updated - - -

Is that who Cuckus Maximus is?

No... people are just paranoid. Neither his posting style nor content are the same.

[Orbitus]

So much misinformation going around.. almost as if people don't understand that the American media is biased.

The best part in all this is how Russia, the country our media has been demonizing for years is trying to save us from ourselves. As Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said: "The show must go on: Release the transcripts of conversations with NATO partners, with each other. The publication of speeches at closed CIA, FBI and Pentagon meetings seems highly valuable. Bring it all out!"

If the Democrats prove short-sighted enough to bring this impeachment to the Senate, it would really help drain the swamp and get Trump re-elected.

What a load of bullshit.

- - - Updated - - -

And none of you leftists ever have any good arguments so you resort to slander. I also never defended Trump. If you're going to reply, at least understand what you're replying to first.

When anyone says "leftists" they lose. This isn't a real thing. Because there really isn't much of an American "left", we have the Center, which is where the likes of Bernie Sanders and Warren are, we have center right, which is corporate and moderate Democrats like Biden, and we have far right, which is Trump and the neo-fascist wannabes.

- - - Updated - - -

Well let's start with the fact that it was actually Biden who strong-armed Ukraine into dropping the investigation against his son by threatening to withhold aid. Meanwhile, Trump had a friendly conversation their president. Of course the media spins this every which way they can to influence voters.

So, he was the ONLY one that did this? Not several other groups and other countries? Especially since the Bidens weren't even being investigated? And Biden didn't have the sway or pull to stop any money like Trump did?

And Trump's "friendly conversation" had the words "I would like for you to do me a favor" in it, which means he was asking for illegal information from Ukraine on Biden. Even if Trump didn't withhold the money, that would be an impeachable offense, just like he did in 2016.

You aren't an Obama voter, you are at best a gullible Fox News viewer.

- - - Updated - - -

Actually I don't watch Fox News. Half of my family does and while I don't despise them for it, I wonder how they could actually believe any of their propaganda at face value. I guess a lot of people have no concept of independent thought on this forum.

Of course nothing was found against Biden's son... Biden literally got the prosecutor in charge of investigating him fired by threatening to withhold aid.

Biden didn't have the power of the purse or the sway to deny them anything. And Biden was investigated by Ukraine and cleared.

- - - Updated - - -

It is. I read it. And before you spew the leftist propaganda about how it's the redacted version, keep in mind that the version available to the public was released with the Ukrainian president's approval. If he felt strong-armed, don't you think he'd approve the version that proves it?



Name one thing I made up. Meanwhile news networks spin events the way they want the public to view them every day.



By a technicality of the law, you might be able to argue that Trump did something illegal. In reality though whether his actions were legal or not, I'd want to know what Biden was involved in before deciding whether or not to vote for him. However that information comes to light shouldn't matter.

- - - Updated - - -



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXA--dj2-CY

enjoy

Why are we to believe a random shit Trump humping youtuber's 1 minute video that has no context or evidence?

[nonameelf]

Well let's start with the fact that it was actually Biden who strong-armed Ukraine into dropping the investigation against his son by threatening to withhold aid.

Biden negotiated the removal of a corrupt prosecutor on behalf of the US government, the IMF, and the EU. He did not do it for his own gain nor did he have the power to do it on his own.

There was no investigation into Biden's son when this happened. This is a bullshit conspiracy theory, which is against forum rules.

Meanwhile, Trump had a friendly conversation their president. Of course the media spins this every which way they can to influence voters.

Because asking a foreign government for help in an election is ILLEGAL.

[Cthulhu 2020]

Good one. For the record, not a "Trumpkin" LOL! Not Republican or Democrat either. If you must know I voted for Obama and abstained from the last election. The only difference between myself and the people parroting what their tv tells them is I think for myself.

Previous post before this one:

>Media is biased
>If everything comes out it will all be fine
>Democrats are in way too deep and will hurt themselves
>Trump will get reelected and the swamp will be drained

We sure do have a lot of """""independents""""" in these forums who tend to vomit up stuff straight off Fox.

[Thekri]

Is that who Cuckus Maximus is?

Probably not. However the relentless shitposting trying to get reactions, together with the join date make it possible.