1. #11261
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    40,027
    Quote Originally Posted by Draco-Onis View Post
    Still silence from the DOJ and the state department which is expected since Pompeo and Barr were part of the crimes.
    Huh. That's interesting.

    Quite frankly, any government of any country should take it personally when an ambassador to said country is spied on. Even by Trump and Trump's own personal attorney.

  2. #11262
    Sen. Martha McSally, a Republican facing a difficult election race, lashed out when I asked if she would consider new evidence as part of the Senate trial. “You’re a liberal hack - I’m not talking to you. You’re a liberal hack.” She then walked into a hearing room.
    https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/12...848771074?s=19

    No you are a doodoo head! They are down to name calling.

    https://twitter.com/SenMcSallyAZ/sta...808547841?s=19

    Here is the actual video sent out ne McSally herself.

    I guess she think it's cute correcting her grammar from 'your' to 'you are'.
    Democrats are the best! I will never ever question a Democrat again. I LOVE the Democrats!

  3. #11263
    Merely a Setback PACOX's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    ██████
    Posts
    26,375
    What a day and it's nearly gun.

    I bet Trump woke up with the idea that the GOP was going to bat one out of the park for him.

    Im counting 3 Ls so far:

    Parnas interview
    Ukraine report
    GAO report

    I no longer care how fast the GOP exonerates him, he'll forever be an orange stain in the books.

    He's probably going to be impeached again if the House can help it.

    Resident Cosplay Progressive

  4. #11264
    1. I don't trust Parnas. At all. I trust materials he provides, but not his word. I get he's saying things anti-Trump folks like, and I honestly believe much if it is true, but there's no reason to implicitly trust him in the slightest.

    2. Holy shit. This benefited Trump about as much as Prince Andrew's Epstein interview benefited him.

    - - - Updated - - -

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...ao-says-099682

    White House violated the law by freezing Ukraine aid, GAO says
    Presented without comment.

  5. #11265
    But...but..., I thought Trump didn't do anything wrong? I am the confused. /s

    Seriously though, when there is mountains of evidence, investigations, testimonies all proving he did the thing, maybe you should realize that he did the thing. Simply closing your eyes doesn't mean it's dark outside.

    The sad thing is after everything, those Republican Senators will still believe water is dry and fire is wet just to be ignorant fools.
    Looking for <Good Quotes for Signature>.

  6. #11266
    https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/16/polit...yde/index.html
    CNN reporting that the FBI is at Robert Hyde's house. OOF!

  7. #11267
    The Undying
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    34,560
    Quote Originally Posted by Bodakane View Post
    I think the DoJ should stay where it is. The problem with giving it to the SC is that then you'd have life appointed people with waaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyy toooo much power.

    However, there should be an investigative arm of the SC that specifically handles corruption in the other two branches.
    It wouldn't be a lifetime appointment for the peeps in the DoJ - those could rotate through a 5- or 10-year nomination process. Which would work fairly well. The issue are the people right below the AG - normally political appointees currently - but would they also get appointed by the SCOTUS or would the AG or some other process.

    The Impeachment and the tragically impartial AG Bar is making this issue very germane.

  8. #11268
    Quote Originally Posted by Vegas82 View Post
    This has gotta really piss Drumpf off. He tried to forced Ukraine to investigate Biden and they end up investigating his henchmen instead.
    i think he still somewhat accomplished his goal, which was essentially to associate the name "biden" with "controversy".

  9. #11269
    The Undying
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    34,560
    Quote Originally Posted by Bodakane View Post
    I think the DoJ should stay where it is. The problem with giving it to the SC is that then you'd have life appointed people with waaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyy toooo much power.

    However, there should be an investigative arm of the SC that specifically handles corruption in the other two branches.
    It wouldn't be a lifetime appointment for the peeps in the DoJ - those could rotate through a 5- or 10-year nomination process. Which would work fairly well. The issue are the people right below the AG - normally political appointees currently - but would they also get appointed by the SCOTUS or would the AG or some other process.

    The Impeachment and the tragically impartial AG Bar is making this issue very germane.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by PACOX View Post
    What a day and it's nearly gun.

    I bet Trump woke up with the idea that the GOP was going to bat one out of the park for him.

    Im counting 3 Ls so far:

    Parnas interview
    Ukraine report
    GAO report

    I no longer care how fast the GOP exonerates him, he'll forever be an orange stain in the books.

    He's probably going to be impeached again if the House can help it.
    I could actually see that happening, especially if the Senate refuses to call witnesses and new evidence.

  10. #11270
    Quote Originally Posted by Vegas82 View Post
    This has gotta really piss Drumpf off. He tried to forced Ukraine to investigate Biden and they end up investigating his henchmen instead.
    Irony is delicious...

  11. #11271
    https://www.thedailybeast.com/kellya...-on-lev-parnas

    Kelleyanne Conway gave a good sneak peak at the Trump defense on Fox News.

    When asked, repeatedly, if Parnas was correct in saying that Trump was aware of everything she...refused to answer directly and just tried to discredit Parnas. That's not hard to do, but that's also not an answer.

  12. #11272
    The Undying
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    34,560
    Quote Originally Posted by solinari6 View Post
    https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/16/polit...yde/index.html
    CNN reporting that the FBI is at Robert Hyde's house. OOF!
    It seems there is a trend wherein if a House member is rabidly defending Trump, they're about to be "interviewed" by the FBI.

    (or investigated for ignoring sexual predators while coaching high school sports)

  13. #11273
    The Unstoppable Force Belize's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Gen-OT College of Shitposting
    Posts
    21,942
    Quote Originally Posted by Vegas82 View Post
    Well, the Senators have been sworn in and now head off for a 4 day weekend.
    Must be nice to work so little and have that many vacations

  14. #11274
    The Undying
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    34,560
    Quote Originally Posted by Belize View Post
    Must be nice to work so little and have that many vacations
    I mean, they go home from Washington and then work in their state. I know politicians get a lot of grief, but most of them work very hard.

  15. #11275
    Immortal Stormspark's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Columbus OH
    Posts
    7,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    https://www.thedailybeast.com/kellya...-on-lev-parnas

    Kelleyanne Conway gave a good sneak peak at the Trump defense on Fox News.

    When asked, repeatedly, if Parnas was correct in saying that Trump was aware of everything she...refused to answer directly and just tried to discredit Parnas. That's not hard to do, but that's also not an answer.
    The "defense" will involve Chewbacca.

  16. #11276
    Quote Originally Posted by Trunksee View Post
    Not saying any one wouldnt. My point is he did it in the press right after the house got the documents that is abnormal. Yes many many people turn under police or to reduce their sentences. Most dont run to the media to do it.
    So I bet you have an issue with sexual abuse victims who don't come forward immediately because it's not how you believe it should be done.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by noidentity View Post
    Keep in mind this out of context quote i'm using from Trump saying "I like people who weren't captured", which makes a lot of sense when you treat Trump like a mob boss who considers everyone who is caught like a liability whom he needs to distance himself from.
    Yup. Plus the feds are compromised with the AG acting as Trumps personal attorney. He had almost no choice to go straight to Congress and the press.

  17. #11277
    Quote Originally Posted by cubby View Post
    It wouldn't be a lifetime appointment for the peeps in the DoJ - those could rotate through a 5- or 10-year nomination process. Which would work fairly well. The issue are the people right below the AG - normally political appointees currently - but would they also get appointed by the SCOTUS or would the AG or some other process.

    The Impeachment and the tragically impartial AG Bar is making this issue very germane.
    I'm not talking about the peeps in the DoJ. SCOTUS would be in charge of the DoJ in your scenario.
    "When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown

  18. #11278
    Quote Originally Posted by Trunksee View Post
    Not saying any one wouldnt. My point is he did it in the press right after the house got the documents that is abnormal. Yes many many people turn under police or to reduce their sentences. Most dont run to the media to do it.
    He is under investigation by the SDNY the documents were seized when he got arrested they were only cleared for release a couple of days ago by a judge after SDNY gave the okay. The case he is investigated over has nothing to do with this and he stated in his interview the reason he is going to the media is for his safety. You should watch the interview from Rachel Maddow clears up a lot.

  19. #11279
    Yeah, once he blows it all into the open, then Parnas should be safe.

  20. #11280
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadowferal View Post
    Yeah, once he blows it all into the open, then Parnas should be safe.
    To be blunt I don't think that's it throughout the interview you could tell what really pissed him off was Trump going on TV and saying he didn't know him. That's why he is threatening to leak more each time Trump says something to that effect.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •