Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst ...
4
5
6
7
8
... LastLast
  1. #101
    Quote Originally Posted by Knadra View Post
    Your data is skewed by including developing countries.
    And since you haven't shown any data, your anecdote is skewed by including Switzerland and the US in the same category. Despite no national minimum wage, about half of Swiss workers are covered by collective bargaining, which does include minimum wages (and presumably, as is true in the US, helps raise wages of non-bargained labor). And the other developed countries with no minimum wages (the Nordics) have even more of the workforce covered under unions/collective bargaining. Which again- does include minimum wages, but done by sector instead of for the whole country.

    Also, see here for graphs of developed countries.
    Last edited by Gestopft; 2019-12-28 at 11:13 PM.
    "We must make our choice. We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both."
    -Louis Brandeis

  2. #102
    Quote Originally Posted by ati87 View Post
    You are confusing two different scenario's now.
    A business that is new and still needs to make an actual profit is not the same as established business that can't afford to keep up with inflation.
    The post I quoted did not say anything about "established" businesses.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Draco-Onis View Post
    That type of model are only used by investment firms who set deadlines on firms they buy on cheap.
    Business owners have all types of models.
    TO FIX WOW:1. smaller server sizes & server-only LFG awarding satchels, so elite players help others. 2. "helper builds" with loom powers - talent trees so elite players cast buffs on low level players XP gain, HP/mana, regen, damage, etc. 3. "helper ilvl" scoring how much you help others. 4. observer games like in SC to watch/chat (like twitch but with MORE DETAILS & inside the wow UI) 5. guild leagues to compete with rival guilds for progression (with observer mode).6. jackpot world mobs.

  3. #103
    Titan Grimbold21's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Azores, Portugal
    Posts
    11,838
    Quote Originally Posted by cubby View Post
    No, it's not. Youtube of Fox Business is perhaps one of the most ridiculous sources of information available.

    Raising the minimum wage is good for everyone. From the U.S. Government.
    The text mentions Seatle. Does this study then disprove some of the suggestions made here https://www.nber.org/papers/w23532 , namely the implications that though wages rose, hours were reduced and less money earned overall ? Unless I misunderstood the Abstract's info.

  4. #104
    I Don't Work Here Endus's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    79,262
    Quote Originally Posted by Knadra View Post
    Your data is skewed by including developing countries.
    My data is skewed by looking at all the available data, rather than trying to cherry-pick to fit the assumption I want to support?

    You've got this backwards.

    Also doesn't even hold up when we bother to cherry-pick, either. Here's the same data skinned down to just those on the HDI list here; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developed_country



    No observable trend line whatsoever. It's all fairly flat around the 4-5% range, regardless of where minimum wages are.

    You are making shit up that there is no data to support. You're just observably wrong as to the facts.


  5. #105
    Sounds like these businesses deserve to go under and be replaced, so yay capitalism?

    But ofc Fox needs to create a shitty strawman.

  6. #106
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimbold21 View Post
    The text mentions Seatle. Does this study then disprove some of the suggestions made here https://www.nber.org/papers/w23532 , namely the implications that though wages rose, hours were reduced and less money earned overall ? Unless I misunderstood the Abstract's info.
    It's important to note that that paper was done while the policy was still in the midst of implementation, and subsequent studies- including by the same authors- have cast doubt on the initial findings.
    "We must make our choice. We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both."
    -Louis Brandeis

  7. #107
    Pit Lord Mekkle's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    My desk, Lurkin'.
    Posts
    2,260
    If you cant pay your workers, you shouldn't start a business

  8. #108
    Quote Originally Posted by jeezusisacasual View Post
    I never understood the idea that min. wage should not be indexed to inflationary measures. Like really? Do people not work in their own contract to make more then inflation anyway?
    The problem with minimum wage jobs is that those employees have no power to negotiate anything better. No unions to help, no mandatory collective bargaining. Minimum wage jobs are "take it or leave it" unskilled work and would pay even less if employers were allowed to and they certainly won't increase minimum wages on their own.

  9. #109
    Quote Originally Posted by Kokolums View Post
    The post I quoted did not say anything about "established" businesses.

    - - - Updated - - -



    Business owners have all types of models.
    You are inserting the new business argument yourself in this discussion.

  10. #110
    Quote Originally Posted by Knadra View Post
    Countries in Europe with minimum wages closer to the U.S. have similarly low unemployment rates like Switzerland (no minimum wage) or Germany (had no minimum wage until recently).
    i hope you do realize that even though those countries have no federal minimum wage (germany being a recent exception, but a lot of others still haven't got one), there's a defacto minimum wage as a result of them being heavily unionized.
    We're talking at a level where people who's not member of a union, often will get hired under the same wages and conditions as somebody who is, because it is so ingrained and the employers are not willing to run the risk.

    A mcdonalds in denmark has higher running costs than the ones in the US, and pay their lowest skilled workers around 18-ish usd/hr. the cheeseburger only costs 50 cents more than the US (and prices in general are comparable to the US), and they still somehow turn a profit.
    And albeit anecdotal, when i visited the US café prices were close to danish prices as well. But yet the business allegedly can't keep themselves going without having their customers subsidize their employees already insanely low wages?
    it sounds more like there's other issues that's making them fail, and they are using wages as a scapegoat to avoid paying their employees a living wage.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Kokolums View Post
    That's not true. Maybe a business model requires x number of months to scale up before the business becomes stable or even insanely profitable. An unexpected expense can cause the company to go under before time expires.
    Wages are not an unexpected expense.
    And if you go by a business model that requires a rampup (looking aside from drawing in customers for new businesses) you should always include redundancy, and make sure you have the resources to reach the breakpoint. it may include overwork and unpaid hours from the owner/founders, not the employees.

    Being shit at running a business is no excuse for underpaying your employees.

  11. #111
    Quote Originally Posted by Endus View Post
    My data is skewed by looking at all the available data, rather than trying to cherry-pick to fit the assumption I want to support?

    You've got this backwards.

    Also doesn't even hold up when we bother to cherry-pick, either. Here's the same data skinned down to just those on the HDI list here; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developed_country



    No observable trend line whatsoever. It's all fairly flat around the 4-5% range, regardless of where minimum wages are.

    You are making shit up that there is no data to support. You're just observably wrong as to the facts.
    Exactly. There is very little data to suggest that raising minimum wage leads to higher unemployment, elsewhere or in the US. Just within the US alone, we have a huge set of data to look at which tells us this: we used to raise minimum wage every year for decades until around Reagan. Unemployment, particularly among minimum wage workers, did not appear to change in any correlated way.

    When the studies came out that showed this, conservatives launched their own study to prove the opposite: they showed that the last minimum wage hike resulted in a net increase in unemployment - they just failed to mention that the last minimum wage hike happened just as the Great Recession was kicking off, so there was a stronger predictor already in play (they got trickier with the data than this, because they claimed their study used a method to account for the Recession, but that's a whole harder thing to explain).

    Minimum wage is basically a component of a correct understanding of the economy. American conservatives get it wrong because they insist on a "trickle down" economy, supply side, or whatever they choose to call it. They believe enriching the top of the business chain will result in success at the bottom, inventing more and more complex explanations for how this comes to be. But the simple truth is that the majority of all wealth goes one way, and that's up - so putting more money at the bottom means that more money is flowing through all of the various class and business structures on its inevitable trip to the top.

    The Cherry-Picking Argument Fox News and the like use is one that's used in virtually every conservative argument on economics. Someone is going to do worse because of a minimum wage hike. And that's true. Just like it's true that curing cancer would end the livelihoods of millions of people in the healthcare industry that specialize in cancer research and treatment. But no one would ever argue that we shouldn't cure cancer.
    Last edited by Grapemask; 2019-12-29 at 12:06 AM.

  12. #112
    If we reverse tbose tax breaks that were given to the wealthy, I suspect congress could easily index min wage with inflation.

  13. #113
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadowferal View Post
    If we reverse tbose tax breaks that were given to the wealthy, I suspect congress could easily index min wage with inflation.
    We should do that regardless, but you wouldn't need to do one to do the other. Indexing min wage to inflation would be a revenue increase on its own.
    "We must make our choice. We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both."
    -Louis Brandeis

  14. #114
    Quote Originally Posted by Twdft View Post
    The problem with minimum wage jobs is that those employees have no power to negotiate anything better. No unions to help, no mandatory collective bargaining. Minimum wage jobs are "take it or leave it" unskilled work and would pay even less if employers were allowed to and they certainly won't increase minimum wages on their own.
    This is why again i support a more modern WPA to help lift those employees. I am in the camp of a rising tide lifts all boats.

  15. #115
    The problem with not having a minimum wage is that the system is set up to prey on the most desperate. Morally and ethically, that can't ever be a good system.
    "When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown

  16. #116
    Quote Originally Posted by Twdft View Post
    The problem with minimum wage jobs is that those employees have no power to negotiate anything better. No unions to help, no mandatory collective bargaining. Minimum wage jobs are "take it or leave it" unskilled work and would pay even less if employers were allowed to and they certainly won't increase minimum wages on their own.


    I know it's part of a comedy bit, but a lot of comedy is rooted in the truth, and what Chris Rock said is sadly very true. At least, when it comes to here in America.

  17. #117
    Quote Originally Posted by Kokolums View Post
    Business owners have all types of models.
    As an owner you have two views your employees are labor in which case they represent a small percentage of your cost an increase would only hurt slightly or they are labor and assets in this case you would be paying them more anyways. The theory you are presenting only happens when private equity is involved because they want ROI at an exact time frame not a regular business owner.

  18. #118
    Quote Originally Posted by Kokolums View Post
    That's not true. Maybe a business model requires x number of months to scale up before the business becomes stable or even insanely profitable. An unexpected expense can cause the company to go under before time expires.
    What unexpected expense can turn a successful business into a dead one? The only ones that come to mind are lawsuits or natural disasters.

    Dontrike/Shadow Priest/Black Cell Faction Friend Code - 5172-0967-3866

  19. #119
    The Unstoppable Force PC2's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    California
    Posts
    21,877
    Quote Originally Posted by Bodakane View Post
    The problem with not having a minimum wage is that the system is set up to prey on the most desperate. Morally and ethically, that can't ever be a good system.
    Okay well I wish more people would say that this is their position upfront. In many of these threads it seems that people are arguing with each other based on entirely different perspectives.

  20. #120
    Quote Originally Posted by the game View Post
    Who would've ever thought this would happen..... More democratic policies causing jobs to be lost.
    A business that depends on slave labor for its economic viability doesn't deserve to remain in business.

    I'm saying this as a business owner.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Dontrike View Post
    What unexpected expense can turn a successful business into a dead one? The only ones that come to mind are lawsuits or natural disasters.
    The latter of which would be covered by insurance.
    Last edited by Mihalik; 2019-12-29 at 04:17 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •