they spent 10000 years right next to Val'Sharah. If they were going to study druidism, they'd done it by now.
they spent 10000 years right next to Val'Sharah. If they were going to study druidism, they'd done it by now.
Have to agree that blizzard gets a bit lazy on art assets when they already are working on something else. But then i see dottie being a pet on the shop and think to myself what in the hell! xD or even taking time to add a disco party in the Auction house.
But druids are also an exceptional race to dps/tank/heal tho. And even can dps both range and "melee" as cat.
(i also love monk one of my favorite classes)
they are no longer night elves, their race changed
Even if their society resemble the highborn of old who were night elves, those elves were not druids either, in both way the logic is wrong
he not being before, and with ntohing seeming to change, does suggest heis not a defacto druidBut there is nothing to suggest that he isn't now
and and behave are not something that important, shamans also behave and act like druids sometimes, yet they are nothe behaves, acts as one and his background story makes it so obvious that it shouldn't need stating directly.
still don't change the fact that for him tot each then would be the same as a tauren teaching a goblin, or everything is available, or nothing about this pick bias
CBA reading seven pages of weird takes on Druidism, but...
Nightbornes do not exactly care for Nature. The botanists used flowers and trees for aesthetic purposes, shaping them to look as they wanted them to, not as they should've grown out to. While they might offer an interesting take on mix of Arcane and Nature due to Arcan'dor, they by nature (pardon the pun) do not care much for Nature - so why should they be Druids?
We already saw the disregard towards Nature from Farondis (not even a Night Elf) in Azsuna, with how vain they are regarding unwanted animals or w/e, so Nightborne who cage animals and keep them in a zoo or pervert the surrounding land with Arcane - doesn't really scream Druid to me, does it? Valewalker dude was mostly intrigued by Arcan'dor anyway, and Nightborne only care about it because it can cure them from their addiction.
As for monks, I'm not sure either. Some of the race/class combinations with monks make no sense.
They kept turning themselves into trees! Why do you think Suramar has so many?
It's simple. They were isolated long before the Night Elves even adopted the Druitic ways, so they never learned it, yet when they joined the Horde, the Pandarens were tere and could teach them Martial Arts which I assume they refered.
You are welcome.
First priest of Gonk or one of Yaungol. I am not counting Freya.
- - - Updated - - -
It was either a tauren or troll.
- - - Updated - - -
Highmountain are tauren blessed by Cenarius with horns. They are naturally druidic. It is like asking why do void elves have shadow priests.
- - - Updated - - -
They also met Farodin in between.
Again, talking about society, not race. But the same is for the race.. we often get into silly classification arguments when source material has no definite standard to go by. What is playable races in game menu is not necessarily so in lore, because race doesn't always mean same category of species and Warcraft lore doesn't define exactly what that means for people groups with similarities.
Sub-race is coined term to show a group that is related to a larger group, there is no fixed definition there either. I can argue endlessly from my perspective of nightborne being a night elven su-race, part of the night elven umbrella race because they are nocturnal and kaldorei based, we dont' even know what the exact genetic variations are, they are not as extensive as the high elves, evidently from appearance, but that's the only standard, it could easily turn out that nightborne appearance is just skinny night elves who's ear tips curled upwards. Skin tone changes are just rarer kaldorei tones exxacebated by the night well, or it could be a completely new genome of elf.
Regardless of whether it is or not, what we can clearly see is Suramar is kaldorei pre-sundering society that has continued for 10k years, the quests directly tell us thenightborne have preserved this culture pristinelyfor millennia. And we don't need to take the game's word for it now do we. But just in case we don't, the Suramar we read in War of the Ancients is shown in 7.0 as if it was lifted off the pages. and if that wasn't enough, the tons of kaldorei sattutes, the same bear footed civilized savage outlook, same nightsaber/cats for mounts nad pets, it is literally kaldorei elements just arcanised as you would expect of arcane using kaldorei.
They are not introduced as something completely different from the Kaldorei either, they are introduced from the arcane civilization side of the kaldorei rather than something entirely unique. They are just a unique expression of kaldorei, or rather the arcane expression of them as related to the pre-sundering society for the kaldorei. Not that it makes much of a difference
As you wish, I'm just saying, in cases like this, it seems more logical to assume he ishe not being before, and with ntohing seeming to change, does suggest heis not a defacto druidbased on what we are shown of him unless proven or outright shown he isn't
1) the first Troll druid was introduced in Wrath at the earliest 10000+ years after Malfurion was taught by Cenarius, Gonk did have priests beforehand, but they weren't Druids, Troll druids are stated to follow a method of worshiping multiple Loa at once, and was never done till Wrath
2) it's been confirmed that Malfurion is in fact the first druid, Tauren merely thought they were the first
3) the Horns of Eche'ro were gifted to the Highmountain in the later years of the War of the ancients, the scenario literally has you talk to Malfurion who is clearly casting Druidic magic
Last edited by Psykho; 2020-01-01 at 10:48 PM.
This is where things are going to get muddled... you mean the elves that refused to follow the new blood elven thinking that is the response to being told to go die for the alliance? Cause I'll be honest, you gotta be some kind of stupid to STILL be content to go stay with the bunch of people who were quite fine with sending your brethren to die so others can be safe and then scorned the survivors for living...
I was asking for a citation to get a good idea of which time you were referring to cause, to be honest, the elves were already scorned before the point I think you're referencing... So really, how can you still view Quel'thalas as the traitors when they were pushed into a bad situation and left to die by their allies and condemned to death when they didn't die completing their assigned missions?
Your example seems to entirely disregard that the nation itself was already turned on by it's allies. This is where the whole set up of who is really the traitor is going to get up-ended. Cause you want to say the blood elves are the traitors because they turned on the alliance... but I'm saying that the lore establishes that the alliance had already turned on Quel'thalas prior which is what set the stage for the events you're referencing.
Actually, the covenant are a branch established post 3rd war to stand against Blood Elf presence in Dalaran. It's true they are high elves that stayed with the alliance but they also stayed through the events of the third war... keep in mind that the Grand Marshall of the Alliance abused his authority and called for the execution of Quel'thalas' last crown prince and all his associates and not a single member of the alliance lifted a finger to help bring justice.... Fact that this was something held within the grounds of Dalaran makes one question what people think the high elves are supposed to care about such things...
This type of argument assumes that there was even much desire to stay IN. The alliance and Quel'thalas' place within it is something that has been a subject multiple leaders were on the fence over. Like during the 2nd war when the Elves didn't want to involve themselves except for the fact that they pledged to support one specific nation when needed.
Such a shame, it seems like a good deal of info isn't understood.
edit:
So it seems you want to label Quel'thalas as traitors for exiling the high elves that didn't agree with the handling of events post third war but will disregard the betrayal of loyalties exhibited in the third war which happened prior. IMO you can't really call the blood elves traitors to the alliance because they were left to die and condemned to death first before they could actually do anything remotely resembling a 'betrayal'
Last edited by mickybrighteyes; 2020-01-01 at 11:09 PM.
As I said Harvest-witches aren't "true" druids like the Nightborne botanists and the Thornspeakers in Kul'tiras presumably are only "true" druids because they were taught by Olfar as they are 1) presented as having a similar role as harvest witches and 2) are part of a nation that was descended from Gilnean sailors
You may think so, but many people actually like them and they are the main attraction to wow over all other races, when you combine the playerbase that plays the 4 elven race, they are nearly half of the playerbase.
You may think they're the weakest link with nothing close to the depth and appeal of Tolkein elves (which I agree with you on the second part) but warcraft has always been cheese, and their elves are a bit cheese despite the cool concepts for them. But you know most of wow is "cool" with little substance.
but you do realize there are beginners right? lv was just a way to say the beginners are not strong and don't know many things
anyone could be a monk apprentice easy, to grow and be a master is where lies the difficulty, not on then but in any class
- - - Updated - - -
regardless, they are not the same race, they changed by the nightwell, just like dark trolls changed to night elves, if they have similarities or not i another point
and that was not a druidic culture, they didn't live on trees and neither the rest of the druid shenanigansRegardless of whether it is or not, what we can clearly see is Suramar is kaldorei pre-sundering society that has continued for 10k years, the quests directly tell us thenightborne have preserved this culture pristinelyfor millennia.
thats not how it worksAs you wish, I'm just saying, in cases like this, it seems more logical to assume he is based on what we are shown of him unless proven or outright shown he isn't
i think by now you should face that a nightborne druid make s much sense as a goblin druid, and to allow yone you ahve to allow all the others
I guess someone didn't read Chronicles. Before Malfurion we had: yaungol, Zandalari, dark trolls, valewalkers and many other kinds of druid.
- - - Updated - - -
Priests of Gonk were exactly druids. Cenarius doesn't have copyrights for druidism.
No. It turned out that they learned druidism before even evolving to tauren.2) it's been confirmed that Malfurion is in fact the first druid, Tauren merely thought they were the first
This doesn't mean that they can't have druids.3) the Horns of Eche'ro were gifted to the Highmountain in the later years of the War of the ancients, the scenario literally has you talk to Malfurion who is clearly casting Druidic magic
My guess is everyone can punch but those elves locked in their city bubble sort of pushed out the nature needed to harness in Druid magic. Lest that’s what makes sense to me..
All that "who was the first druid" talk only strengthens my belief that lore talk about Warcraft universe makes little sense, since everything was, is or will be a subject of retcon.
Just like Chinese humans and indian are not the same race because their eyes and skin colour are slightly different, and one tends to be shorter than other.. when you look at nightborne and night elves, one's ear tips turn up and the other tapers, the only other noticeable physical difference is slight colour variation and one is skinnier than the other.
Both are night based elves, directly related and connected to each others.. but sure they're not the same race, because the nightwell changed the appearance of one.
The way I view it, is that they're not the same ethnicity (and the variation was magically induced). But if you're American, race doesn't actually mean race like it does in the UK, where "American" race usually means ethnicity in the Uk. In America you call black people a different race to what you call Hispanic people and what you call white people, in the UK we don't classify that as race, a race is change of species, we call those variations ethnicities of the same race.
Wow has no official standard of race definition, all elves technically are one race, with several variations, all trolls are one race with several variations. AS players we tend to call variations like nightborne sub-race of night elves, void elves as sub-race of blood elves, etc. However in the character creation, variants are classed as races of their own. Dark Iron dwarves are not the same race as Ironforge dwarves by that standard, yet they are the same race (i.e. species), Same with highmountain tauren and Mulgore Tauren, Lightforged draenei and Draenei.
Nightborne are a different race (ethnicity) of night elf, not a completely different race (species). After this more detailed attempt to clarify what I mean, you can continue to view them as a completely different race, I will continue to view them as a different race of night elf. I have acknowledge that what you define as race in this instance is not the same as me (likely because of language and definition irregularities). I acknowledge what your definition of race means to you makes them different races, but what my definition of race actually doesn't make them a different race but a variant of the same race. I can only assume that in your language race is both used for different species and different ethnicities of the same species or different sub-species like it does when it comes to humans in U.S.A America that never got the memo in the 19th century that humans didn't come in different races, but continued to refer to the variants as different races where the English world across the pond used the term ethnicity.
To each their own.