Does this take to account that McConnell seems very not in the mood for a vote like that and is in fact asking the Senate (I think?) Republicans NOT to object and to just accept Biden? Or has that changed again?
Besides, aren't there enough Republicans in the House and the Senate who would vote to accept?
There's a finite number of hours between Jan 6th and the deadline. The article also suggested each individual vote, not state, vote, could be challenged. And that challenge by vote could be dragged into court. More stalling. Fewer hours left.
Obviously the Party of Trump would never give Pelosi the keys to the WH. So there's going to be some dancing. Which Party of Trump members object enough to cause a vote, while which Republicans agree with democracy enough to ensure the vote still ends with the will of the people -- even if doing so brands them as traitors to what their party has become?
- - - Updated - - -
Yes. Any single Senator and any single Rep can force the two hours of debate and vote. McConnell could rally what's left of the GOP to ensure the vote actually ends, but he can't stop the first two steps. He can block the third...with help from actual Republicans, not cultists.
- - - Updated - - -
There have been enough Senators who have said so, yes. And again, for the Party of Trump, President Pelosi is a nightmare scenario. This is more of a "expect more fuckery that amounts to nothing" warning sign than "this will 100% happen for suresies"
Hmm? Probably what's she wants.
I hate to be this person but when you stay and work in this administration it will likely backfire on you. Now Biden will likely purge long time government employees, but he better purge anyone hired from 2016 onward.
Once again a person m, who's responsibility was to govern and keep a functioning government to the next administration. So DeVos should be reprimanded if possible.
My goodness the projection of the crazy deep state, now trying to create one.
Democrats are the best! I will never ever question a Democrat again. I LOVE the Democrats!
Ok, I read the article, and here's where it would end:
Ted would LIKE to challenge each vote, but I'm pretty sure McConnell will say no.The law envisions the ability to challenge electoral votes collectively or individually. Surely a crafty legal mind like Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) would challenge, not each state, but each electoral vote separately.
Sounds like McConnell isn't going to allow the GOP Senators to pull any bullshit shenanigans. Which is frankly pretty smart. Because no rational, thinking, intelligent person thinks the election was anything but secure and legitimate.
- - - Updated - - -
So would I. I think a lot of people would love to see it. But McConnell is no dummy. He won't let the Senate look bad, even if individuals want to impeach (see what I did there?) their credibility outside the Senate floor.
- - - Updated - - -
I bet we see a few idiots shouting during the formal process about "[whatever conspiracy theory crosses their little brains]".
Sen. Paul said this to Krebs' face:
Yes, he was told the election was free of foreign and domestic interference. No, he did not provide any evidence. Yes, he still said the election was stolen based on his feelings.To say it was the safest election, sure I agree with your statement if you are referring to foreign intervention, but if you are saying it’s the safest election based on no dead people voted ... no people broke the absentee rules, I think that is false and I think that’s what’s upset a lot of people on our side is that they are taking your statement to mean there, oh there were no problems in the election, I don’t think you examined any of the problems we heard here, so really you are just referring to something differently the way I look at it
So that crap the article I found said could happen Jan 6? Expect Paul to get in on that.
And we are seeing, first hand, a United States Senator posit the dangerous notion that his opinion is as important as the facts. Asimov is rolling in his grave.
- - - Updated - - -
Trump has reportedly been convinced he actually won, tells advisers he may not vacate the White House.
That would be a fantastic early 2021 xmas gift. Dare to dream....
I hope the media is prepared to and actually does put Trump on mute/ignore come Jan. 20th. Not counting Newsmax/Q/Fox, every media outlet shouldn't even give Trump the time of day let alone any airtime.
I know Trump's daily rantings/fits will be a ratings boost but walking away from the old guy shouting at clouds would be the best thing for this country to move on.
And the media shouldn't be shocked when Trump
a) doesn't attend any formal functions for ex-Presidents
b) tries to dictate policy from the sidelines
c) interferes with foreign relations
d) makes stupid demands of Republican congressmen to investigate every theory that floats across Newsmax's screen.
e) doesn't portray a single ounce of dignity or grace as a living ex-President.
f) fleeces his supporters and strokes his ego by continuing to hold his MAGA rallies.
My understanding is there is jack shit a redneck Trumpster state could do if there is a warrant for Trump's arrest in New York. That extradition between states is automatic and can't be stopped unless the state he is in has their own charges against him and they catch him first.
Edit* So Trump and his lawyers could fight extradition from say Florida to New York but for the most part Florida can't do shit to stop extradition beyond technicality fuckery.
http://https://criminal.findlaw.com/...n-process.html
Last edited by pathora44; 2020-12-17 at 09:16 AM.