You get angry if someone calls you a facist, but you're very quick to defend the importance of making sure things like racism, anti-semitism, and facism are enshrined in politics. If you are going to argue that those views are a valuable part of American politics, you should be willing to own up to the label put on people who espouse such views.
The problem here is that none of the things Felya mentioned were a mold that any of us set for Conservatives. It's one that the conservatives themselves built and embraced of their own free will. Speaking for myself, I would be more than happy for conservatives to move away from those stated beliefs, because I believe that sane conservatism has an important place in politics.
Only if you view everything as a binary left/right, which is highly inaccurate. Many people have very different views on social policies than they do on financial ones, and don't want a desire to balance a budget to be inextricably tied to banning abortion (as an example). A two party oppositional system forcibly ties too many unrelated issues together, and allows both parties to run on platforms of "We aren't the other party" rather than having meaningful competition on policy ideas.
It's really funny how it's all "We won, we have a mandate for our policies, get over it" when the Republicans win, but if the Democrats win it's suddenly "The minority party needs the power to block". Conservative voters already have their voices weighted higher, when even that isn't enough to win you should be asking yourself why some of those views are so disliked, not 'how can we unbalance things even heavier to force them through'.