I would add "or otherwise under oath" but other than that, this, one hundred times this.
Anyone can say stuff online which isn't true. Hell, I've done it. I've intentionally misquoted people so often I got infracted. But if there was an actual issue that actually affected the election, I want to know about it. So far, we have Some Random Dude on YouTube and Trump's objective falsehoods on Twitter. Georgia went looking for issues three times and didn't find anything significant.
Honestly, hacked registration checkers sounds like a significant problem to me. I look forward to the court case or legislative hearing in which that evidence is submitted under oath. Until then, my "XXX didn't say it but should have" intentional misquotes are just as accurate as the wind coming out of whatever hole they're blowing it from.