I won't agree with much with you I can tell but I think we can both agree the trial was a shit show. It baffles me how it wasn't simply dismissed with prejudice when the crowns entire case rested on a 140 p video from a block away. Never mind the useless cop claiming to of watched a video off the internet as a expert witness.
The crown let witness commit perjury on the stand and tried to sneak in a gun charge they knew wasn't applicable. Given how iron clad self defense was it is baffling they let it go to trial.
The jury got to watch the full quality of the video before deliberations. The accusations of the video being low quality were that it had potentially been tampered with. Literally nothing changed when they saw the full quality video. Also, it wasn't 140p originally. It was compressed from its original format but not 140p
If this was an "iron clad" defense, then the others would have been perfectly within their right to shoot Kyle under self defense laws as well. Both sides were involved in the creation of the fight. Kyle escalated it by pointing his gun at the victims before any charging began. This isn't contested, this is FACT, even Rittenhouse himself said he did this, and it's very visible in the video he pointed the gun DIRECTLY at people before anyone charged him.Given how iron clad self defense was it is baffling they let it go to trial.
I keep making this quiz but none of the Rittenhouse stans ever answer it, wonder why...
Basic gun safety quiz:
1. Do not point your gun at someone unless you intend to ____________ (fill in the blank)
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
Arbery verdict being read now.
EDIT: Guilty on all charges for Travis McMichael.
No malice murder, but guilty on all other charges for Greg McMichael.
Mostly guilty for William R Bryan.
Last edited by PhaelixWW; 2021-11-24 at 06:43 PM.
"The difference between stupidity
and genius is that genius has its limits."
--Alexandre Dumas-fils
I was exaggerating for effect...the video was clearly of such a shit quality it offered nothing in terms of evidence one way or the other. It also isn't a fact kyle did anything the eight pixels on the enchanced video don't show anything not even what would of been across from kyle when its claimed he raised his rifle. You can't just make things up in court.
Even given that insane benefit to the doubt needed to believe that happened how does it transfer over 20 minutes later to his other attackers? I haven't seen any claim by kyle during the trial of him pointing his weapon at anyone baring the guy who drew on him. Do you remember what day of the trial you heard it on or during what testimony I can check later.
As for you last point. I believe that almost everyone who deserved to get shot there got shoot barring jump kick man.
well shittenhouse might have gone free, but these 3 better hope to never drop the soap.
Thing is, under the law in Wisconsin, all sides can claim self-defense in it. If Rittenhouse can use it, so can others. If the one who had a gun pulled it out after being fired apon and shot and killed Rittenhouse, they too can justify the use of self-defense of deadly force.
Thankfully KKK neighborhood watch groups remain banned. The fact we had to sweat about it in 2021 is... something.
They can try but it's pretty unlikely to win. There is a difference between rittenhouse fleeing from a violent attacker and an attacker chasing after someone fleeing towards police.
It's a lot like how that guy who ran over 50 elderly people and children in the Christmas parade is claiming self defense. By your logic he is right to. I just don't think it will ring true.