1. #25141
    Quote Originally Posted by Endus View Post
    False.

    https://thewhyaxis.substack.com/p/co...ff-from-people

    It's pretty equal, some years burglars take more, more years recently, cops do.

    That it's even close should be shocking. That cops steal more than actual criminals is absolutely fucking insane. Civil asset forfeitures should total $0 nationally every year.



    Cops don't even get prosecuted. You're clearly not interested in actual discussion, if you're pushing bullshit denial narratives.
    Cops are a criminal organization. No hyperbole.

    They totally understand that no reform will ever get done cause they just will stop doing their job. "Hate for something to happen to you if you don't give me everything I need".

    What you mentioned and why Supreme Court gave them Qualified Immunity and Fear for my Life shield is something now if tried to reform, the cops will act up again and not do their job.

    Cops are here to protect capital. Maybe more than ever as we have seen that they learned into the side of fascism. They will coordinate with the right to hype the crime waive all that to sway elections.
    Democrats are the best! I will never ever question a Democrat again. I LOVE the Democrats!

  2. #25142
    Quote Originally Posted by Spectral View Post
    I don't think this is responsive to the exchange that just happened. Would you say that it's an accurate model of the criminal justice system that a homeless guy stealing form Walmart results in a huge investigation?
    As opposed to there being 0 investigation and prosecution of rich people stealing wages from their employees and workers?

    Yes, it's accurate to say that comparatively, there's a huge hoo-hah over making sure the poor are punished for their transgressions.
    "My successes are my own, but my failures are due to extremist leftist liberals" - Party of Personal Responsibility

    Prediction for the future

  3. #25143
    Quote Originally Posted by DarkRose92 View Post
    "In 2014, for the first time ever, law enforcement officers took more property from American citizens than burglars did."

    For one year, a full decade ago. Lol.

    Criminals take far more from civilians.
    Cops shouldn't be in competetion with criminals for who can steal more stuff...
    “The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.

  4. #25144
    Bloodsail Admiral Karreck's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Beneath you. Devouring.
    Posts
    1,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil Midnight Bomber View Post
    Cops shouldn't be in competetion with criminals for who can steal more stuff...
    Maybe the real thin blue line is marking the boundary between cop theft and civilian theft.
    Princesses can kill knights to rescue dragons.

  5. #25145
    Bloodsail Admiral Karreck's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Beneath you. Devouring.
    Posts
    1,204
    15 years worth of manipulated results. Over 600 affected cases. How many innocent people are sitting in prison because of this woman?

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...dat-rcna142541

    A Colorado Bureau of Investigation DNA analyst intentionally manipulated data in the testing process for at least 15 years, according to an internal affairs investigation.

    Yvonne “Missy” Woods, a now-former DNA scientist who worked at the CBI crime lab for 29 years, has been under investigation since September 2023, according to the bureau, known as CBI.

    The investigation concluded that Woods manipulated data in the DNA testing process and in some cases posted incomplete test results.

    “At this time, 652 cases have been identified as affected by Woods’ data manipulation between 2008 and 2023,” the CBI said in a release. “A review of Woods’ work from 1994 to 2008 is also underway.”
    internal affairs probe dna lab tampering

    The investigation, dated Feb. 26, found Woods "Omitted material facts in official criminal justice records," "Tampered with DNA testing results by omitting some of those results," and violated the bureau's code of conduct and lab policies "ranging from data retention to quality control measures."

    According to the investigation, a DNA forensics team found Woods manipulated her work by deleting and changing data that hid the fact that she interfered with controls and failed to troubleshoot problems that arose during the testing process. It also found she did not provide adequate documentation in case records related to tests she performed.

    "These manipulations appear to have been the result of intentional conduct on the part of Woods," the CBI said.

    The CBI said the findings “puts all of her work in question."

    Ryan Brackley, an attorney representing Woods, said she "will continue to cooperate with law enforcement to preserve the integrity of her work that resulted in true and just criminal justice findings — whether arrests, convictions or exonerations."

    The bureau launched the investigation in September after becoming aware that a DNA sample testing performed by Woods "may have deviated from standard operating procedures."

    Woods was placed on administrative leave on Oct. 3, and later retired from her post on Nov. 6. The CBI said she did not perform any additional lab work during that time.

    Since Oct. 3, the CBI, in collaboration with members of the Kansas Bureau of Investigation, looked into all of Woods' work over the course of her 29-year career with the bureau.

    Ultimately, the review did not find that Wood "falsified DNA matches or otherwise fabricated DNA profiles."

    "She instead deviated from standard testing protocols and cut corners, calling into question the reliability of the testing she conducted," CBI said, adding that Woods "should have conducted additional testing to ensure the reliability of her results in these affected cases."

    Her attorney said the investigation's findings "support Ms. Woods earlier statements she’s never created or reported any false inculpatory DNA matches or exclusions, nor has she testified falsely in any hearing or trial resulting in a false conviction or unjust imprisonment."

    A separate criminal investigation into Woods launched late last year is still underway, according to the CBI.

    The CBI said it is working to implement changes that will "enhance the integrity of its testing processes and their results" and to prevent this kind of issue from arising in the future.

    "Public trust in our institutions is critical to the fulfillment of our mission," CBI Director Chris Schaefer said. "Our actions in rectifying this unprecedented breach of trust will be thorough and transparent."

    The bureau said it is also working through an audit of all of its DNA analysts "to ensure the accuracy and completeness of its entire catalog of records."

    Over the course of the audit, the CBI found that an additional analyst who works for the Weld County Sheriff’s Office at the Northern Colorado Regional Forensic Laboratory may have also manipulated DNA testing data, but noted that this case is separate from Woods'.

    That analyst, Chiara Wuensch, was fired by the Weld County Sheriff’s Office last month after an internal investigation that centered on “anomalies” in her work. The investigation, which began Jan. 31, found she “violated the Weld County Code for expectations of proper conduct, and the sheriff’s office standards of conduct policy for not cooperating with the agency’s internal investigation,” according to the sheriff’s office.

    Wuensch did not immediately respond to a request for comment on her termination or the circumstances surrounding it.

    The sheriff's office said it intends to pursue criminal charges against Weunsch
    Princesses can kill knights to rescue dragons.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •