Still have not established that there was any issue of safety that was set for the area that would have justified this.
It should be dead simple, because the cop isn't someone who can make that decision, so if such exists, you should be able to produce evidence. If you can't, it's because you are wrong.
A cop can't just randomly declare that there's a restriction on people's rights and force people into their homes because he wants to. That would be an unlawful order, and any actions he takes to enforce it are thus crimes.
That's literally the point. You keep avoiding the actual issue to fantasize about the possibility you were right. Everyone else keeps pointing out that there's no evidence backing that fantasy. And you keep refusing to make that case.
No such state of risk existed. You're making that shit up.
And you're okay living in a society where you give away that much power to the police. That's fine. I think there is a decent chunk of the population who thinks police shouldn't have to ability to tell you to do something they don't have the authority to tell you to do, then use that as an excuse to punish you. You can rationalize the justification of their orders till you're blue in the face, it doesn't make you smart or clever, it makes you a cuck.
I am perfectly fine with words. I use them correctly. You spin them to suit your needs. Being perfectly reasonable doesn't automatically mean it is the right decision in the situation, particularly when there are better decisions that could have been made instead. Reasonable does not mean correct or perfect.
This is reminding me of the red scare period the more i read about it in relation to trump using mccarthyist language lately.
It is also true most of the anarchist and provacateurs were indeed russian and pro soviet agents,
russian intel in US creating these groups in order to help trump ?
we know they had the capability since 1918 before social media was even a thing..