With that attitude why not just ask for everything to be handed to you
With that attitude why not just ask for everything to be handed to you
The top 100 titles sound daft really. In my rather unpopular opinion, PvE titles should be tied to the cutting edge achievement, rather than to the general dungeon & raid achievement. But I guess that'd annoy a lot of people who got their Light of Dawn title in 2018 while trying for a mount
Youre barking up the wrong tree, bud.. I agree that there are plenty of rewards for top level PVE.
You probably should have read what my comment was in response to. lol. I was specifically replying to one person about a specific point.
Also, please be aware that what some people enjoy about games IS the competitive aspect - Being the best at X.
Rewards flaunt that youre the "best at X".
Last edited by Recovery; 2020-09-15 at 05:27 PM.
Youre obviously very out of touch with wow pvp, which i knew as soon as you were unaware that Glad isnt 0.5% of the bracket anymore.
Its almost impossible to go under 1400 mmr even if you lose EVERY GAME. you literally start at 1500. If you started at 0 mmr (you dont) then maybe 1500 would be middle of the pack.
With the way they changed the brackets, the average player is honestly 2000-2400.
Titles used to be purely percent based.. Now, the onl percent based title is "rank 1" at 0.1%.
Everything else was changed to a rating threshold. 1400 = combatant, 1600 = challenger, 1800 = rival, 2100 = duelist, 2400 = ELITE, 2400+ 50 wins at or above 2400 = glad.
Last edited by Recovery; 2020-09-15 at 05:33 PM.
Yeah... Once per xpack.
AOTC mount so far ONLY existed on the last tier of xpack and I think it started in MOP with the guaranteed wolf, before that in Cata the "AOTC mount" was a random drop most people didn't see, similar to the green Gul'dan mount that was 1% drop rate.
So youre proving your own point moot? Like what?
- - - Updated - - -
You people have some really awkward points that i must not understand.
Like whats your point?
Also, you had meta achiev mounts in the raids as far back as wrath. Most people didnt see those when content was relevant either..
You could say that it was a reward for "top end" players.
It's also a worthless title because you lose it if the guild disbands and vast majority of guilds sooner or later disband... look Method. Yeah they're back but under different title and they lost whatever was tied to the old guild. On lower level of progress it's even more common for guilds to break apart, reform, server / faction transfer and whatnot. If you work on something it should be tied to your account not guild where some mismanagement at the top can get you screwed over (literally a case of Method where mismanagement of Josh scandal caused it).
The point is glory mount everyone can get, it's 100% guaranteed even if you get it 5 xpacs later, it's not an exclusive reward, meanwhile the pvp mounts and m+ and cm mounts before rotate out of use and are no longer obtainable.
How about we get the pvp mounts obtainable by trivial solo content 5 xpacs later how would you feel about that?
Also the point is AOTC mount is 1/xpac, mythic mount is usually 2/xpac and pvp mount is usually 4-5/xpac not counting the seasonal ones for the saddles which doubles that amount.
That happened.. With the WOTLK glad mounts that blizzard decided to make as a reward for the ICC meta achiev.
pvp seasonal mounts = every pve mount you can get in the game.. Literally anyone can get them.
Glad mounts are all the same thing recolored.. and its not even that prestigious anymore seeing as how the percentage based system was taken away from it.
All of the "vicious war mounts" can be bought off a vendor for a saddle 5 expacks later...
Like i feel like youre arguing just for the sake of arguing without looking at the whole picture.
Last edited by Recovery; 2020-09-15 at 05:48 PM.