Sorry, how is employees owning shares of the company they invest their labor in "braking (sic) up companies"?
If your issue is that you don't want the company's shares to be sold off as a result of it being successful, then keep it within the company. Or are employees not part of the company?
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
Than it won't be a problem for her. Why you keep bringing it this up for someone who won't have this problem because she can run a company so well? If she's so good to get your praise, she'll adapt and thrive. Oh right, that contradictory libertarian mindset, where she is so successful and great and running her company, but simultaneously who's destined to lose her company.
Once again, you're proving my point for me. This was always about the destruction of companies.
- - - Updated - - -
Once again, the math was provided. That's simply not a viable option, because you are literally taxing her out of the company.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
I provided mountains of evidence, as well as math and statistics. Can you refute an ounce of it?
Nope, because you don't want to.
Just like how Republicans have always wanted to ban abortions, and disenfranchise minorities, Democrats and progressives have wanted to close companies down.
I wouldn't go that far. The company I work for, the previous owners that I work for sold it to the employees of the company and we are more successful then ever. Granted, this is only one datapoint but saying that would cause the destruction of a company is a hyperbolic.
How is a company transferring ownership from a single person, who inherited the company to begin with, to the people who work there and generate value for the company "destroying" it? I mean, they kinda have a vested interest in not destroying the company they're not part owners in, no?
It's not freedom, because the government is forcing her.
That's like saying the woman is free to just not have the baby, and let it stay in her belly, when abortion is banned.
So tell me, how exactly does she adapt, given the math and data that was already provided?
Let's see it.
God damn, cheering on forced socialism.
Love it.
You never did show how much growth in her other assets she would need to have, in order to keep her company.
Here's a hint... it's a lot.
- - - Updated - - -
Nope, you want to tax people out of their own property.