All homophobic, malicious lies.
He was censured in 1990, for fixing some parking tickets for a friend and writing a misleading memorandum to help them shorten probation. No "relations with underage pages" bullshit, which is entirely made up.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-...577-story.html
There was no "brothel"; he had a friend while he was still closeted who had been an escort (how they met, with Frank as a client for a single encounter), and continued to escort while they were living together without Frank's knowledge. This friend was not remotely "underage"; he was in his mid-late '20s when Frank met him.
You seem to be confusing Frank's story with that of Gerry Studds, another early gay Democrat, who was censured for a relationship with a 17-year-old Congressional page. Which he admitted to. And which wasn't illegal (age of consent in DC is 16). And Dan Crane, a Republican, was also censured in the same scandal for the same thing; a relationship with a 17-year-old page. It was just a girl that time, which pretty clearly pulls out what exactly is getting your knickers so twisted you're gonna lie your ass off like this.
Conflating "being gay" with "pedophilia" is just standard homophobic hatemongering.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-...823-story.html
Wanna try again without lying this time?
MMO-Champ the place where calling out trolls get you into more trouble than trolling.
Barney Frank was reprimanded (not censured) in 1990 for helping an adult male prostitute. The rest is a lie.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barney_Frank#Scandal
Meanwhile a short fingered vulgarian was groping underage girls at beauty pageants and getting special plane rides from his buddy Jeffrey Epstein.
so, someone else was running a "brothel" and you say, "Frank was running it"??? Adult males having sex with other adult males again relates how to Duggar? Where is even the claim it was "underage brothel"???
Where is the proof he had relations with underage pages?
There were a bunch of congressmen who got caught during Franks time, but he was not one of them nor was he censured for it. (Besides technically none of them were underage at the time based on historical age of consent laws in DC at the time but still very creepy and wrong)
The even more ironic part....
The attempts to censure and expel Frank were led by Republican Larry Craig (whom Frank later criticized for hypocrisy after Craig's own arrest in 2007 for "propositioning an undercover cop in a Minneapolis-St. Paul airport bathroom").
Remind me of when Barney Frank was arrested and convicted of anything? I'll wait.
Hell remind me of when any pages came forward and said he did anything inappropriate?
So, we are back to you comparing a Gay Adult and his Gay activities to that of a pedophile. Seems like typical Right Wing Republican tactics. You should take the time an actually read about the Censure and How Anti-Gay it is and some of the crazy things these nuts said.
The resolution passed by the House was based on the ethics committee's finding that Mr. Frank fixed 33 parking tickets for Mr. Gobie and wrote a misleading memorandum intended to shorten Mr. Gobie's probation for sex and drug convictions. The memorandum found its way to a Virginia prosecutor and became public after the scandal broke. The committee said statements in the memorandum ''could be perceived as an attempt to use political influence'' to affect the probation.
After its 10-month inquiry, the panel, known as the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, found there was no evidence to sustain several allegations, including one that Mr. Frank was aware that prostitution was taking place in his apartment and that he engaged in sexual activities in the House gymnasium.
LOL....good to see several other people jumped on your false statements. I bet you ghost this thread as fast as you possibly can instead of admitting you have a huge problem with gay folks.
Last edited by Zan15; 2021-12-12 at 06:10 PM.
Buh Byeeeeeeeeeeee !!
Yeah, maybe the flat-earther should keep his flights of fancy to himself. Unless he's got more than words on a forum to back it up.
That generally seems to be the conservative poster's go-to around here when their "claims" are immediately tanked by a half-dozen people.
Educated response? Nope.
Attempt to explain nuance? Nope.
Admitting they were wrong? Hahaha... nope.
They just disappear, to pretend as if they never saw it.
But will they change their minds? No; they'll hold both the fact that they were proven wrong, and unable to refute it, alongside their supposition that somehow they're still actually right.
- - - Updated - - -
Careful, the word "flights" might be triggering to him... I'm pretty sure that, according to flat earthers, airlines and pilots are in on the global conspiracy.
How else could you fly from South America to Africa in the same time it takes to fly from the US to Europe, when the two southern continents are supposedly across the entire disc from one another?
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.
Who? Isn't this like the "tabloid talk" of politics? Political discussion should be about political principles, governance, and policies, imo.
Sorry, the guy made himself into a political figure. Also, his father was running for office and, well, it's just as fair as Hunter Biden.
Hands are tied, dude. Or, was that just deflection?
Get back to us when, like, literally anyone on the GOP side of things comes out with anything approaching principles, solid proposals for governance, and justifiable and concrete policy suggestions.
Like, literally any time. Because for about, oh, 9 years now? They've had fuck-all to bring, to the extent that in 2020 they didn't even pretend to have a platform of meaningless buzzwords and propaganda. They literally just didn't have a platform. Their platform was literally "we'll do whatever Trumpy Wumpy wants to do, because we have no opinions about any of this crap and never did".
All we can talk about with regards to the GOP is the character of their membership. There isn't anything else to discuss.
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.
Also, didn't you vote for a guy that claimed his defamation case, you know, the one about raping someone, could not be brought while he was in the WH? I don't think a Trump supporter is in any position to say "this is tabloid talk" when he specifically and personally uses the WH to shield himself from tabloid talk he personally and specifically caused.
I'm sure you'd prefer this sort of thing not apply to your chosen leaders, but they pulled it on themselves, so, blame them. You can't blame us for enforcing the rules your side made.
Why do Republicans support sexual predators as part of their political beliefs? Why did you?
For some reason, you think this is some ad hominem attack, but it's simply condemning people for their actions and their beliefs. That literally is the position of the GOP, worship of shitty people.
As has been shown before, you have stated you'd vote for Hitler himself, so long as he promised to give you what you wanted. This isn't some personal attack, it's what you flatly said you'd do.
"Don't judge me for my beliefs and actions!!!"