https://www.actionnetwork.com/ncaaf/...in-the-nil-era
Signing record media deals but you have idiot ADs like Gene Smith publicly begging for people to donate NIL money. Share your own pot or cut head coach contracts in half if you need to why the hell is it alumni's job to pay the players? If there are some super rich alumni that just want to see their team win and pay players a lot more power to them but coaches or ADs basically begging for more money is so incredibly tone deaf.
Last edited by Tech614; 2022-12-27 at 12:41 PM.
Liberty Bowl has been pretty good, going to OT.
/s
Extended playoff can't get here soon enough so we have meaningful games being played before NYE instead of the complete sham exhibitions that bowl games have become.
But they aren't, and in fact have historically been used against the Pac-12 to "prove" they aren't as competitive as the other Power 5 conferences.
Oregon pulled out the win. Lanning gets a first-season-head-coach 10-game winning season.
The Pac-12 is 2-1 in bowl games so far.
However, I will absolutely give some ground on the idea that we aren't seeing teams at their best (even at the CFP level), with players sitting out prior to entering the draft, etc.
Washington beats Texas in the Alamo Bowl. Sweet victory. Gotta suck for a Texas team to lose the Alamo bowl.
- - - Updated - - -
I mean, at some level, you're absolutely right - Texas lost to UW last night, but they were down their two best RB's and IIRC their starting QB.
And the deepest irony is that I want to agree with you. People use past bowl games to slam the Pac-12 as being inferior, and I really don't agree that the bowl games are the best judge of a team - outside of perhaps the CFP. It will be interesting to see how the expanded CFP affects players who might have opted out.
USC only has 1 year left in the Pac 12, so they aren't important for the long term trajectory of the conference. Also have a feeling Riley is going to be a train wreck in the Big Ten unless he figures out how to get a defense and a consistent running game. He could end up being rich mans Maryland that always looks great early in the season then it all falls apart when he has to play a few Big Ten teams in late October and November in cold weather stadiums with no defense or running game.
Got to love money winning out over fit and common sense.
Last edited by Tech614; 2022-12-30 at 06:15 PM.
See, this is my problem. You lay out some huge claim stating that the bowl games don't matter, even as I point out that the Pac-12 is kicking some ass this year. And then the moment I start to agree with you, you slide right back over with "but the Pac-12 should dominate regardless".
Do you see the serious inconsistency with that argument?
Either the bowl games matter and are a good judge of inter-conference competition, and therefore the Pac-12 is looking good this year in that head-to-head competition; or they don't, and therefore never have, so the past comparisons that have the Pac-12 not looking great in the bowl games doesn't matter.
Which is it?
Isn't that actually a reason to prop the pac-12 up? Because they don't have one team that wins the conference ever single year? They have consistently good teams all over, and they compete well against themselves. You say they are flawed because the talent is spread across the teams, but doesn't that argument actually make the case that the Pac-12 is one of the best overall conferences?
- - - Updated - - -
I really can't wait to see how he does in the Big-10. His defense was non-existent and the running game was pretty blah.
The only good piece of the USC move is the money. The rest is almost pure stupidity.
Fair enough (btw, these football talks are great - enjoyable; I say that just to be clear, as written-only communication can sometimes be misinterpreted)
But the production of Championship teams is predicated on one team dominating a conference - we see that every year since the CFP was started. You really can't make it there unless you win out your conference, and the Pac-12 rarely if ever does that. So that argument would actually indicate that the Pac-12 is the best conf (outside the SEC, lols - and even then, the SEC only has a few dominant teams).
If you're looking at draft picks, take the number of draft picks per conference over the past 10 years, and divide it by the number of teams in each conference. THAT would be an interesting statistic to look at.
The SEC seems like it's miles ahead, and in some objective stats they are, but they also have teams that routinely dominate the conference, without any other team beating them out of an undefeated season? Is that the definition of a conference that is "miles ahead" of everyone else?
The SEC isn't miles ahead because of being the SEC or their particular schools but how football is treated in the south. Your kid starts playing serious football from middle school, and they play fall and spring football and they are in legit S&C programs from that point on.
Alabama has 1.5% of the US population but they have 12 players ranked in the top 100: https://247sports.com/Season/2023-Fo...hool/&State=AL
So with 1.5% of the US population they have 12% of the top 100 recruits. Football is life, religion and culture in the south and it's hard for non southern teams to pull recruits from the south. So if it's not Alabama, it will be a UGA and if it's not UGA some other SEC power will rise and land these recruits. The middle and bottom of the conference is usually meh because the top teams are taking all these high end recruits and there is an absurd amount of them.
Alabama has 7 5* commits and 20 4* commits and they only had to leave the SEC footprint to recruit 5 of them. It's like playing the old NCAA Football video games for them.
Last edited by Tech614; 2022-12-30 at 08:08 PM.
Happy with how orange the orange bowl is this year, cheez-it bowl must be jealous.
/s
Lilithvia Thread Directory| Go Utes!
I feel like every noteworthy program is tampering at this point. If not from the coaches directly then from the boosters. It's the complete wild west out there and the NCAA has lost all control. So many kids announcing transfer portal, only visit 1 school and then immediately commit, yes sure totally no tampering going on here /s.
Fucking UCLA losing to Pitt...what the actual fuck.
Lilithvia Thread Directory| Go Utes!
Yea I don't doubt it at all. There is so much bullshit tampering being attempted and the NCAA is doing nothing about it. A player being contacted to transfer before being in the portal should be an NCAA violation if it's anyone with a rooting interest for the program at all, not just a coach.
You are wrong in one regard here. Serious football does not start in middle school in SEC country. We start at that in elementary school if not in the cradle in some sectors!!!!!
- - - Updated - - -
You know it was going to happen until the NCAA pulls in the reins.
They won't institute any rules about it because they would be almost impossible to enforce, and to put it mildly, the ship has sailed on NIL money coming for transfers. Whether it's good/bad is a mixed bag, but overall, it means the talent that is bringing in millions of dollars to universities is getting paid - which isn't a bad thing.
- - - Updated - - -
Wow - Kansas St getting their asses kicked.