Can you address my response, because the crap you linked, is exactly what I responded to you several times to with. Look:
These are what I and other addressed many times and you just refused to respond to. This is NOT anything different than I already tried to explain to you, but you seem to ignore:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...dquarters.html
http://articles.sfgate.com/2005-06-2...y-dead-animals
http://www.consumerfreedom.com/news_...d-its-a-felony
This is a blog, which I can write as well:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/art...terrorism.html
This is pure humor as it's a place that informs you how to donate money to large corporations, such as the meat, smoking and alcohol industries. You can actually see them mentioned on my first post and calling for people to donate money to the wealthy:
http://activistcash.com/organization...ent-of-animals
This is a community blog:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/commu...oldkngt/gGxg5x
This one is the best. This site that you claim "PETA Harassing a School!" is using it self as the source. It's a self referencing article, with the only link going to a news day article, which has nothing to do with children. It's also ran by the same people who run the OP site and the donate money to the wealthy site you linked above:
http://www.consumerfreedom.com/news_...ol-into-circus <<< PETA Harassing a School!
No one was harassed, unless you think complaints over the kennels treatment of animals should have been ignored. It wasn't PETA who lunched the government investigation, it has no power to do so. But, what do you expect from "Right pundits"
http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=3710
They are not harassing the church, unless investigating the church farm by the government is PETA harassing them. One of the links they use on their site, leads directly to the ad I posted for you earlier, as that's the actual problem the church has with PETA:
http://www.calvaryabbey.com/id147.html
This article you claimed "PETA sues Obama for killing a fly", said nothing of the sort. PETA used it as a publicity stunt and even sent Obama a humane fly catcher. You would have to be a lunatic to sue over a fly or not check the sources of something so ludicrous:
http://www.frumpgazette.com/2009/06/...-as-peta-does/
Uhm, they sued the university for it to release it's records on the treatment of animals in it's lab. What's the problem? If the university does nothing wrong, nothing bad will happen to university.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/7...h-records.html
You don't bother to read the entire article? How is any of this horrific?