The only thing that is "rehashed" about the raiding content is 3 bosses names. 3.
How in the name of Christ is that all rehashed content? Tell me, and I swear by my (insert something here; Couldn't think of anything) that I will shut the fuck up, and never post on any but the RP and warrior forums ever again.
Hey Now! Don't paint the whiners as disaffected veterans. I'm a so-called veteran player and I'm not whining.
--
As far as the question OP asked, I don't need to defend Cata. All I really need to do is decide whether I'm having fun and whether I'm getting $15 a month worth of fun. Since 2005, the answer has been yes. When the answer turns to no, I'll stop playing and more importantly stop paying.
I'm a crazy taco.
A few zones that should have been available from the start were tacked on with Cataclysm.
Especially Uldum, Gilneas, and Hyjal. Also, Uldum was supposed to be a dungeon.
They managed to turn it into Egypt Land.
It's just not cool design.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gaq62VCcnew
Nevar 4get Exarch Cyn.
The Horde and The Alliance haven't changed since Warcraft 2. Pandaren are the first true change to either faction for 12 years.
I'm not sure why people think that just because THEY are enjoying the game, that means it hasn't lost 900,000 subscribers and that means it was an amazingly designed expansion.
The bare bones of the fact is : This expansion was subpar. It was rushed. It was not well designed. And most importantly, aspects of an UPDATE became an ENTIRE expansion - you know, the shattering?
There are plenty of reasons for you to enjoy things. But that doesn't mean a sinking ship has no hole in it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gaq62VCcnew
Nevar 4get Exarch Cyn.
The Horde and The Alliance haven't changed since Warcraft 2. Pandaren are the first true change to either faction for 12 years.
Nice assumption bro!
Cept that I think that's a stupid idea altogether.
Don't assume just cause i enjoy the current content I want it easy.
SO! now that you've done your homework:
Did they re-use models? noo...
Did they re-use anything but end bosses? nooo....
Did they re-use the mechanics on those bosses? nnooooo.....
Did they re-use zones? nnnnnoooooo.....
Oh... Shit... Guess it's just name and theme then... HOW DARE YOU YOU RECYCLING BASTARDS!
<remix>
I recycled this car!
Oh really? Cool man! Did you use the engine?
No...
Did you use the frame? Suspension? Interior?
Noo.....
Shell?
Nnnnoooooo.....
Well?
It's got the badges off of the old car on it...
... You are so environmentally friendly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gaq62VCcnew
Nevar 4get Exarch Cyn.
The Horde and The Alliance haven't changed since Warcraft 2. Pandaren are the first true change to either faction for 12 years.
The problem is that too many people are applying the term in too loose a fashion. To whit: there are a lot of people who complain that practically anything that was once used and is now used again has been "recycled" or "rehashed", when the actual details say something different. For example, SFK & ZG use the same dungeon layout as the originals, but both are entirely new as far as bosses are concerned. And yet people will claim this is "rehashed" content. Yes, some things have been rehashed, most notably ZA, which is pretty much the same as the old level 70 raid. But most of what people call rehashed, isn't.
I'm a crazy taco.
Closing since this thread has gone to shit.
Also, I like Cata. Why? Because I'm having fun playing it. I don't like SC, or really Diablo, or even WC in general, but apparently everyone who is having fun in a game is a rabid fanboy because *you* personally don't like it.
Pretty immature reaction.