Chat thread v2.0

[Kerath]

well, you did somehow manage to even derail the chat thread.
i mean... that's quite the feat, really!

I think we have angered Gunner, based on his post in suggestions and feedback, lol

[PizzaSHARK]

I have no possible explanation besides it all being in your head because I see nothing.

Half-lidded, sleepy eyes are usually referred to as "bedroom eyes."

If it's supposed to be KAWAII DESU~~~ cutesy crap, why not just give her a :3 face?

[semaphore]

sporespore's fault.

And it was more than just a couple :/

What did I do!? You guys were already 10 pages into derailing cuddle thread before I even showed up!

[obdigore]

Lolicon is someone with a lolita complex. This is clearly sexualized.
Loli has nothing to do with that.

If that is true I apologize, but I've never encountered anyone saying or posting 'loli' stuff without sexualizing it.

[Deleted]

Half-lidded, sleepy eyes are usually referred to as "bedroom eyes."

If it's supposed to be KAWAII DESU~~~ cutesy crap, why not just give her a :3 face?

Shinobu is supposed to be playful-cute/creepy, not kawaii-desu.
God it's like you have no clue.

Cower before her true form!

So very scary.

If that is true thats fine, but I've never encountered anyone saying or posting 'loli' stuff without sexualizing it.

So very sexualized.

[Xanjori]

I think we have angered Gunner, based on his post in suggestions and feedback, lol

Ahahaha I hadnt even seen that, thanks for the laugh

[obdigore]

Ahahaha I hadnt even seen that, thanks for the laugh

I felt like starting a thread named 'Ban Gunner' but then he was actually banned and it felt pretty over the top :P

[semaphore]

God it's like you have no clue.

Sums up PizzaShark quite well I think!

If that is true I apologize, but I've never encountered anyone saying or posting 'loli' stuff without sexualizing it.

Don't be fooled, loli is but prey for lolicons. Normal unsexualised kids are beneath the attention of lolicons!

[Xanjori]

I felt like starting a thread named 'Ban Gunner' but then he was actually banned and it felt pretty over the top :P

I just reported him for his shit-posting in here, did the job well enough.

[Dyra]

Well... That is related to what I suggested on the previous page. 2K+ pages of posts is getting to the point where is worth considering opening a new thread anyway.

[PizzaSHARK]

You need to get your mind out the gutter.

Why would they give it a spider face that doesn't make much sence.

Why would you sexualize a child? Or a 500 year old whatever that uses the form of a child?

[Sy]

When they say it's hard to make the trains run on time, we're why that's so.

i'm afraid i've never heard anyone say that before, sorry ¯\(º_o)/¯

I think we have angered Gunner, based on his post in suggestions and feedback, lol

well, i think kittens trying to cuddle up to him while he tries to watch tv or something would probably anger Gunner.
he seems like a generally angry person.

[semaphore]

I think we have angered Gunner, based on his post in suggestions and feedback, lol

He's sad that other people (us) are posting innuendo things that he used to post. We must make it up to him by posting moar

[Deleted]

Why would you sexualize a child? Or a 500 year old whatever that uses the form of a child?

Okay, drop the assumption that she's being sexualized for a second.
Just a second.
Just a tiny, little bit of a second.
And consider for a second, the possibility that she's not and it's all in your head.

[semaphore]

Well... That is related to what I suggested on the previous page. 2K+ pages of posts is getting to the point where is worth considering opening a new thread anyway.

Can we call it the GenOT chat thread this time? So old chat thread folks stop wishing death and suffering upon us innocent victims of Majad GenOT oppression?

[PizzaSHARK]

Okay, drop the assumption that she's being sexualized for a second.
Just a second.
Just a tiny, little bit of a second.
And consider for a second, the possibility that she's not and it's all in your head.

Which is why the pose and expression are used repeatedly elsewhere for things which are deliberately and highly sexualized, right?

[Anakso]

Just a bit.

Starting to wonder if it's worth closing this thread and have an entire brand new start. 2K+ pages is an over large thread anyway.

Generally we only close threads if they start to display problems, like lagging. Don't think we close them just for being big and PvM gets over 4k before it's closed iirc

[Dyra]

Can we call it the GenOT chat thread this time? So old chat thread folks stop wishing death and suffering upon us innocent victims of Majad GenOT oppression?

I was going for just the General Chat thread, but why not. General Off Topic Chat Thread equally sounds good.

[PizzaSHARK]

It is not sexualized, it is a vampire.

Vampires and sexualization have kind of gone hand-in-hand ever since Anne Rice published her take on them :/

[semaphore]

I was going for just the General Chat thread, but why not. General Off Topic Chat Thread equally sounds good.

It's a good name

I call dibs on creating it

---------- Post added 2013-01-16 at 12:30 PM ----------

Vampires and sexualization have kind of gone hand-in-hand ever since Anne Rice published her take on them :/

It's not sexualised, it's just... anime/manga =/
It's dirty like that.