I don't care so much that it's BoU, I mind that it is a one-time affair. All of the other pets in the store apply to every character on your account. This one does not. Waste of money to me.
Here is where I see this going,
Joe Smoe buys "Single Character Pet" from blizzard at $10 for said pet. He then decideds that we would like to sell said pet in the AH.
Bob Smith decides that he wants said pet and can either (a) buy the pet from Joe with his hard earned gold or (b) he can buy the "retarded" pet himself from blizzard at $10 per toon. Choices!
John James wants the pet too, but figured that he can go to "any" gold selling website and buy 16-21k gold for $10-$18 . He then proceeds to buy said pet of the AH for "maybe" 8-10K gold and still have 6-10k gold left to do wth he wants with it.
Good job Blizzard. This just gave more business to the gold sellers. You dont need to be the smartest person in your household to figure this out.
Tibben- So some kid got mouthy after killing a guy in a game because anonymity allows everyone to be assholes, and the guy tracked him down and choked him? This sounds like the real answer to stopping trolls. If everyone that trolled anyone got choked I imagine there would be a significant decrease in trolling in games and on forums and the world would be a better place...except for the ones that like being choked, but that's a different story .
We're whalers on the moon,
We carry a harpoon,
But there ain't no whales
So we tell tall tales
And sing our whaling tune
better idea. it cost 10$ online for bop. it cost 25kg to buy from vendor and is bop. giving a gold sink for the econ, and preventing the issue of people essentially paying $$ for gold.
that way it is available to those with the money and those with the time. and for those with neither, well tough itll just be yet another thing u dont have the time to get.
Free to play is the future of mmo's. Blizz knows this and its the direction they are heading. They will sell more and more in game stuff. They will limit what they sell in wow. Free to play is financially better for them.
This is a terrible argument/defense. Blizzard is not just a company. If money was their only interest they'd be an insurance broker or bank. They are a game developer, to this generation, video games have become art. As much is money is important, so is making a wonderful product. It is not all about the profit.
1% of the Heroes control 100% of the winrates
#occupyantimage
#occupynaturesprophet
I am glad they are doing this. It makes it even easier for me to quit this game for SWTOR. So I guess I should have voted good idea instead of bad...
Here I was wondering why I hadn't seen any of you crazy doomsayers pooping about this mount and it was because my topics were set to "Off-topic".
I believe it's as a unbiased as it gets - I'm no blizzard hater preaching wow's doomsday at the hands of <insert random mmo>. First of all, I was trying to give an example, which you apparently took for a real situation. That doesn't mean it can't happen. I've seen people buying their kids a 80.000 euro car, even though they won't be able to drive it (legally) for at least 6 years. Who are you to deem my reply as an "unreal exaggeration, insulting, and generally childish"? I would say my point stands.
There is a huge difference between what they are doing and what you are proposing. They're adding a safe expensive way to buy gold for money - sure - however, it's limited in the fact that it requires you to spend the time selling it, with a ever reducing market to sell said pet too. No new money is generated from this, therefore the actual market isn't affected = the ingame rich become poorer, and the poor become richer. Note: This shouldn't affect the value of the gold that characters already have, therefore doesn't Penalize those who don't use it.
What you're suggesting would cause a massive influx of new gold into the economy, causing massive inflation and reducing the value of gold on a server. This therefore negatively affects anyone who doesn't buy gold as their gold will continue to decrease in value.
If they were ever going to start selling gold, this is the best possible way to do it with the least negative side effects.
---------- Post added 2011-10-10 at 09:49 PM ----------
You're example was pretty awful tbf.
If you were to buy 200, you'd then have to spend a hell of a lot of time selling them, while the price of each drops as you are adding more and more into what's likely to be a saturated market anyway. If you had instead spent said $2000 on a handful of TCG mounts, you would probably make more gold at a quicker pace.
You didn't get what I was saying, either. I wasn't comparing buying the car with buying the 200 pets (which, as I've said, was a number I pulled out of my ass, don't take it so seriously). I was merely trying to point out that there are kids with access to significant amounts of money. That being said, I won't debate whether or not some random kid who's parents got loads of cash buys 200 lions, I'm just saying IT IS possible, and it DOES affect economy.
First Diablo 3 and now this, they are trying really hard to appear as the most greedy gaming company ever, aren't they?
This is pretty much what is going to happen.
A whole bunch of people will end up buying this with the intent of making gold, but there will end up being too many on the AH and the price will fall drastically. At best, a few people might a decent amount of gold, but once the AH starts to get flooded with these, the price will go down.
I am pretty sure that buying the pet doesn't mean your buying gold. If I happen to ever want to buy one and it sends me money as well I will be the first to report it here.
To be serious, the Blue Dragon Whelp sold for outrageous gold for many years because of its low drop rate in game. Your basically saying that it should have been free for everyone and buyable from a vendor. The thing about economies is that if something is common it becomes worth less. Since everyone is going to try to make a buck off this pet I doubt you will see it sold for more than a few thousand gold for any amount of time.