Diablo 3 - Unlock #4 - Dev Diary 3, Monk Sigil, Blizzard Music, Blue Posts, Christina Sims, the Female Monk

Alliance Pandaren Introduction
After leveling a new Pandaren character the player must choose a faction to leave The Wandering Isle. After selecting a faction you meet with the faction leader to learn a little bit more about the faction.



WoWDB Update - Advanced Tooltips
We're progressing on WoWDB and even if it's still far from finished, we just climbed the first step toward improving how we work on MMO-Champion: advanced tooltips!

They're basically the same thing as regular tooltips but with more information when possible. Obviously we're not gathering data from users yet and we will start doing so in a few weeks when the beta looks a little more stable, but as soon as we do we will be expanding the information readily available to users.

HTML Code:
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://static-azeroth.cursecdn.com/current/js/syndication/tt.js"></script>

We're very considerate (yes, we are!) and also took into account that some people might not like the new tooltips, that's why we're giving you the choice! If you want to control the tooltip type for each spell, you can add "?simple" or "?advanced" to the WoWDB link. For example:

If as a site owner you want to disable them, you can also do it by embedding the following code with your tt.js. Users who want to use the advanced versions of tooltips will still be able to use the ?advanced links on your site, but any regular link will default to the simple version.

HTML Code:
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://static-azeroth.cursecdn.com/current/js/syndication/tt.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">var WowDbSettings = { AdvancedTooltips: false };</script>

Where are we going with this? The ultimate goal is pretty simple, if we're doing things right, you shouldn't have to visit the site to get your information. It's also going to be incredibly useful since it will let us track a lot more things on patch days, making our classes changes much more accurate and interesting. This is obviously very much a work in progress and we will be improving this over the next days/weeks but we're terribly interested in feedback and wanted to launch the feature as soon as possible.

In the end, the database has a long way to go. The interface is pretty terrible and finding anything is hard. We're on our way to fixing it (we'll do a first pass on navigation/filters this week now that things are implemented, new design a little later) and we're busy experimenting with cool stuff. It should be fairly shiny soon!

Feedback on the new tooltips would be greatly appreciated!


Changes to Inactive Guild Leader Replacement
Originally Posted by Blizzard (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)
Inactive Guild Leader Replacement was added to World of Warcraft in patch 4.3, and allows an active member to take over the guild leadership position from an inactive guild leader, encouraging guild activity by giving players a way to promote a new leader if theirs has been absent for an extended period of time.

Based on your feedback, we recently modified the Inactive Guild Leader Replacement process. From our most recent hotfixes for World of Warcraft:
  • Inactive guild leader replacement now requires 90 days of absence, up from 30 days.
  • Ascent to the rank of guild leader is now only available to guild members at Rank 2, 3, or 4, where the guild leader is considered Rank 1.
The option to dethrone the guild leader is only visible to the highest-ranked player logged in at any given time.

Since we made this change in a hotfix, it is still possible for the in-game process to present itself to guild members who are at Rank 4 or lower. However, if a guild member at Rank 4 or lower attempts to replace the absent guild leader, they will see an error in-game. This will only be the case until we apply a change to a future patch.

World of Warcraft Patch 4.3.4 Notes
Originally Posted by Blizzard (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)
Ticket Submission UI Improvements
  • A new Submit Bug button has been added. Clicking this option will open a report dialog box, along with basic instructions on what to include in your bug report.
  • A new Submit Suggestion button has been added. Clicking this option will open a text dialog box, along with a description of what to include in your suggestion.
  • The Report Lag button has been removed.
  • The Report Abuse button is now called Report Player.
    • The Report Player function offers four categories: Spamming, Language, Name, and Cheating.
    • Reporting a player for Cheating now opens a text window in which a description of the occurrence can be written.
    • Reporting a Name opens a window with three categories: Player Name, Guild Name, and Arena Team Name. There is also a text field for optional information.
    • Report Player now includes text and visual instructions for how to submit a report.
  • Right-clicking a character’s portrait now offers additional reporting options.

Patch 4.3 Hotfixes - April 17
Originally Posted by Blizzard (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)
Classes
Warlock
Destruction
  • Bane of Havoc no longer persists when the warlock changes to a spec that does not include the talent.
Items
  • Fras Siabi's Barely Bigger Beer is a now bit less big, and its effect no longer stacks.
UI
  • Inactive guild leader replacement now requires 90 days of absence, up from 30 days. Ascent to the rank of guild leader is now only available to guild members at Rank 2, 3, or 4.

Blue Posts
Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
Annual Pass Invite Order
We've stated in the past there are several ways by which candidates are invited to test Mists of Pandaria beta. All we've said with regard to Annual Pass holders is that they'll be invited before people who submitted through our opt-in process, and that they'll be invited in order of Annual Pass purchase date and total cumulative play time on the account.

So here are a few things I didn't feel like typing on Twitter to one person all but accusing us of a conspiracy:

1) You don't have access to enough information to determine with certainty the way in which each and every person flagged for beta access was invited.

2) Even if you were able to prove that one Annual Pass holder was invited a) in an Annual Pass invite wave, and b) before someone who purchased their Annual Pass earlier, has more cumulative play time on their account, and was also invited in an Annual Pass wave, that still doesn't prove there's a systemic flaw in the way in which all accounts are being flagged.

3) We're aware that the terminology we used when initially announcing the Annual Pass feature was misleading. We've already stated we regret the way that went down. That said, we had no reason to falsely claim we'd be distributing invites in a way we had no intention of actually following. There's just no good reason to lie about that and hope people wouldn't catch on. (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)

Red Panda Male Tail
We consider the pandaren models pretty much done: i.e. the distinctive longer tails for female red-coloured pandaren, that we like, are there to stay. Let's say it like this: we don't want to repeat the female worgen on this one. We don't want to second-guess the design.

This may just be my interpretation and not our company's, but the way I see it is that with many things there's always going to be people that like it exactly how it is — as we do — and those that don't. If we change it, the people who didn't like it before the change might be satisfied by it changing, but there's also the chance they might not be. What's guaranteed, though, is that those who did like it just as it was (usually the silent majority) definitely won't like it being changed. (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)

Jewelled Panthers
So I am not sure offhand if any of this information is new or not, but here it is anyhow just in case any of it is news to you.

These will be Jewelcrafter recipes and we're not actually completely decided on whether there will be a recipe for each colour, or whether the creation of one will produce one of the four colours at random.

As I think you already know, the black one will be a little different. It's a flying mount and it'll be created by combining the other four mount colours together.

We're estimating that the cost of creating these mounts will be very expensive. (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)

Monk (Forums)
Monk Mistweaver Feedback
We don't want to need Agility.
We don't want that either. Mistweavers should use Intellect leather. We just have to make sure that any of their damage-dealing abilities don't make Agi attractive. (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)

Paladin (Forums)
Holy Paladin Solo DPS
We don't want Holy to be a DPS spec, but we do want Holy paladins to be able to do reasonable damage when solo, to keep up pressure in PvP, or when grouped in moments when healing isn't critical. Holy Shock and Denounce are supposed to provide that damage, but their numbers are abysmally weak at the moment. We will fix.

The above is relevant to all healer specs mind you. (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)

Warlock (Forums)
Affliction Warlock Feedback
We are discussing removing the limit one on Agony. We think Malefic Grasp already solves the same problem of wanting to make sure that focusing on a single target can be as effective as multi-dotting the room.

(As an aside, it's fine to multi-dot the room, but we want to avoid a situation where a dot class is either terrible with one target or doubles everyone else's damage when there are multiple targets.)

If we make the Agony change, then Soul Swap could move Agony and UA and feel worth doing (assuming Seeds already covers Corruption in an AE environment). It's also possible we could just bring down the Soul Swap cooldown as well. (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)

Trading Card Game Art
Blizzard has updated the Trading Card Game art gallery to feature ten new pieces.



This article was originally published in forum thread: Alliance Pandaren Intro, WoWDB Advanced Tooltips, Patch 4.3.4 Notes and Hotfixes started by Boubouille View original post
Comments 81 Comments
  1. Mouri Kogorou's Avatar
    i wonder if there will be an addon in the future that extract these extra spell details and implement them in-game.
  1. Berethos08's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Difuid View Post
    Varian: You will have to butcher your once beloved ones.//I am sure the Horde introduction is the same
    Pandarens: Sure sure, no problem with that.

    This is so shallow and lame...
    The response of "Yes...of course" is usually the type used in text to indicate hesitation. Just fyi.
  1. Pachycrocuta's Avatar
    Let's say it like this: we don't want to repeat the female worgen on this one. We don't want to second-guess the design.
    nice to see that blizzard realizes they royally fucked up on the female worgen. Now if only they would revert this horrendous change back to the alpha/early beta version of it.
  1. Rekzil's Avatar
    No one else sees the problem of three pandaren walking without an escort into the ROYAL PALACE.. not even stopped at the gates?
    No problem with the KING getting into a fist fight with every new pandaren that joins the alliance?

    On the topic of having to kill old friends and loved ones.. really? Really Blizz? He only JUST received word about pandaren entering the city but he knows that at that EXACT SAME TIME there are pandaren entering Orgrimmar.

    who hired matt ward for blizz quest story?
  1. Azrile's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by The Kao View Post
    Nice video, but oh boy the simple amount of stupidity that goes on in the chat is sickening. How the hell did those freaks get into beta, it's not like their presence is good for any kind of testing.
    Blizzard probably doesn´t even have feedback enabled from the servers where they are dumping the AP people. It goes to the same email as feedback@microsoft.com

    Remember, these are the same people who 2 weeks ago were saying ´lolz.. blizzard is liars and my dad´s friends, neightbor is a laywer!!11.. i will sue´..
  1. Nuvuk's Avatar
    If the horde intro is lacking I suppose we do deserve it after the alliance twilight highlands intro. The only reason I would play a alliance pandarin would be to knock the shit out of varien.
  1. Sykol's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Easo View Post
    Items

    Fras Siabi's Barely Bigger Beer is a now bit less big, and its effect no longer stacks.
    It's good to see that this is what tops the list for hotfixes these days.
  1. mmoc61058f5c96's Avatar
    Classes
    Warlock
    Destruction

    Bane of Havoc no longer persists when the warlock changes to a spec that does not include the talent.

    HAHAHAHA , took you months to fix this worthless bug trololo... now in a more serious case , if it took them month for this i think we`re never gona get rid of dupe one!
  1. mmoc43238c78a1's Avatar
    I hope there's going to be a horde version of the Pandaren Introduction on this site . alliance don't interest me at all.
  1. mmocaaa1948e8d's Avatar
    Horde version is Garrosh acting derp and rather than sparring with the Pandaren himself like Varian, he puts them up against a captured Magnataur in the Orgrimmar Arena.
  1. lakhesis's Avatar
    Even though I'm a long term horde player, I'd got to say that I much prefer the Alliance side of the Pandaren starting quest. It shows the better side of Varian, much like the Horde version shows the worst side of Garrosh. Thanks for the vid!
  1. mmoc22bb16b1c3's Avatar
    You wanted feedback of the tootip change, and that is why i am here posting.

    There are 2 examples: flamestrike tooltip simple and blood presence advanced.
    -If i put the cursor over flamestrike, it shows me the simple tooltip version. as expected.
    -If i put the cursor over blood presence, it says "loading", i waited for more than a minute and it doesnt work as expected. It only says loading.

    I thought you maybe wanted to know this.
    Im using firefox if this helps.

    thx
  1. Rolly's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Thessalor View Post
    A completely random color?

    No, Blizzard. Fuck you if you do this. I'm sick of RNG being the virtual barrier between the players and what we want. What ever happened to the skill barrier like back in Vanilla?
    Have to agree with this, RNG in professions is blatant lazy design. After the disaster that Cata profs were at the start I was hoping for at least a little more effort for MOP.
  1. mmoc20fd1404df's Avatar
    those advanced tooltips are a huge improvement from what is currently in game. hope they will be added to the game already.
  1. Somarlane's Avatar
    Dem advanced tool-tips be shiny mon. Boubouille, if you need beta testers for the WoWdb add-on please let me know, 'kay?

    By the way, thank you to everyone who commented about the Alliance & Horde pandaren introductions without adding SPOILER warnings. </sarcasm>

    ---------- Post added 2012-04-18 at 09:32 AM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Rolly View Post
    Have to agree with this, RNG in professions is blatant lazy design. After the disaster that Cata profs were at the start I was hoping for at least a little more effort for MOP.
    I also agree. I don't want the RNG, I burned myself out trying for Vial of the Sands recipe from Archaeology. Just please... no more.
  1. Linkhyrule's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Pachycrocuta View Post
    nice to see that blizzard realizes they royally fucked up on the female worgen. Now if only they would revert this horrendous change back to the alpha/early beta version of it.
    Ok I really have to know what is wrong with the female Worgen modles. Am I the only one that likes there desing? They look like wolves and I find them pretty nice to look at.
  1. mmoc082361febf's Avatar
    That tcg: Tauren killing multiple dwarfs is beast! Looks brutal!
  1. Dyrtnap's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Rawt View Post
    So now healers are meant to pressure dps? It's already nigh impossible to beat a geared and smart healer (except if it's an rdruid), and now they're increasing the damage they do?
    Idk I think you might be playing one of those classes that cant kill healers because I still think healers are easy to kill even in 2's as long as your healer knows how to support you with damage and utility. I only play DK, Mage and Lock in arena but with competent teammates I have rarely had issues killing healers this season until the 2k+ mmr range bracket range but even then... its more about their teammates utility and overall peels than the actual healer power.

    Also remember you have to ignore what the response says and understand that Blizzard uses political spin to combat how childish some of their fans are. I'll translate into Blizzonian for you: "We'll give you enough DPS to do quests at about a quarter of the rate you would as a DPS spec so you cheap crybabies and those that refuse to use dual speccing for one of its intended purposes will STFU... Seriously you guys are douches. If you want to do damage use a DPS spec... But since you won't here's some lip service and a whopping 2% damage buff. Did I mention you're all crybaby douchbags that are wasting precious development time? ... because you are. So suck it up pretend like your a rational human being and go play DPS spec"
  1. Alayea's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Aliok View Post
    I also agree. I don't want the RNG, I burned myself out trying for Vial of the Sands recipe from Archaeology. Just please... no more.
    I still don't have that recipe after all this time. I don't want to even imagine burning tons of gold trying to get the mount I want via my JC alt or the auction house.
  1. debtbringer's Avatar
    Am I the only one that hasn't got my beta invite yet?

Site Navigation