What?
This is honestly the stupidest idea I think I've ever heard on this site.
I'm not even going to explain myself, it should be obvious.
What?
This is honestly the stupidest idea I think I've ever heard on this site.
I'm not even going to explain myself, it should be obvious.
What about stay at home dads?
If child care is so expensive, and few would deny that it is, doesn't that mean we value child care very much? What happens to the wage gap if we mathematically assign those stay at home mom's the wages they would earn if they were watching kids that were not their own? I suspect we are counting stay at home moms as zero income, and I highly doubt they are being counted at the amount saved, let alone the amount they would earn if it was their job.
Just throwing this here...
https://www.aei.org/publication/the-...t-5x-too-high/
If corporate greed is the cause then them evil CEOs really need to be getting greedier. 7.5-3.1% is a sad haul for legal thieves.
The Right isn't universally bad. The Left isn't universally good. The Left isn't universally bad. The Right isn't universally good. Legal doesn't equal moral. Moral doesn't equal legal. Illegal doesn't equal immoral. Immoral doesn't equal illegal.
Have a nice day.
Last edited by May90; 2016-04-16 at 01:42 AM.
You can't ban "stay at home moms". If someone wants to stay at home and has the means to support that lifestyle they should be allowed to.
I can't like OP enough, great find!
also @ all the people in this thread saying "this is ridiculous, enough!", you CLEARLY haven't even read the article which is quite short and succinct.
I don't know why you guys take Xarim seriously, in another thread he claimed that women working/being educated was the cause of all our social ills. Or some such nonsense.
afaik woman are not forced to stay at home, man can do that too. I mean, at least in Russia, there is no differentiation between woman and man, there is simply "the person performing the actual care of the child"
Last edited by Charge me Doctor; 2016-04-16 at 01:55 AM.
Originally Posted by Urban Dictionary
The part that SHOULD have been bolded for emphasis.
This is an entirely hypothetical solution that the author doesn't even think should happen.
What the author thinks should happen.
Typical flamebait crap that seems to be getting more prevalent on these forums.
This is my favorite line. It's totally true. It would be so much more effective to give families with children more with the child-tax credit than to incentivise sending your kids off to daycare. It's win-win, because the extra child-tax credit really could allow mothers the chance to work if that's what they want to do, or not. They are now empowered to make whatever decision they deem best. Most will choose to stay home. This benefits everyone.It’s as if progressives are okay with children being raised collectively but somehow creeped out by actual families.
MY X/Y POKEMON FRIEND CODE: 1418-7279-9541 In Game Name: Michael__
We should immediately start funding for gene splicing research and by 2020 surgically implant all newborns with both male and female genetic material.
When everyone's a hermaphrodite, there is no gender politics.
That, or we kill all men (except me, of course) the human race will fall to me to usher in the new generation.
4 billion women on Earth, I better get started.
Doing the math in our family, if my wife was to work full time, her entire paycheck would go to daycare. So what's the point of sending them to daycare when it is not benefitting monetarily, and only hurting your relationship with your kids by allowing someone else to raise them.
MY X/Y POKEMON FRIEND CODE: 1418-7279-9541 In Game Name: Michael__