And I'd still take BoW over Virtue's Blade for the sole reason that it
feelsbetter, as I'd do with Final Verdict even if Blizz would give Exe S a flat 3000% ap coefficient. Yes, I'm that dumb if the design of a talent is shit imo.
If my own comprehension and intuition tells me the design is utter crap IT IS utter crap, and as long as I get the feeling it is shit it stays shit, even if someone tries 24/7 long to change my mind about it. Likewise, if some random people with alpha access give off the feeling they give a fuck about my humble opinion just because feeling all high and mighty due to having access - you guess it? - I give a fuck about their opinion aswell. Their opinion is theirs, and just because they get hard on something doesn't mean other players HAVE TO feel the same way.
Anyway, this doesn't concern me anymore. Due to the last couple weeks I've decided for myself to stay the hell away from maining my Ret in Legion if the design stays that way - I don't feel like riding the rollercoaster again this time and may only use him for enchanting and soloplay. I like the design of Fury and Unholy, beta will show which one will get to be my main but imo it's the more secure way, at least for myself. That aswell is the reason why I'm that silent for the last couple days.
@
Reghame
If everything is set in stone everytime, why even bother giving feedback? If what you say rings all true, then why should the devs bother to make even minor changes? I mean, they should then of course know it better, even better than alpha players, or not?
And if no one suggests such changes, from where should the devs get inspiration everytime? Other games, only from themselves, or maybe from wildly writing up something and throwing darts at it? Nope...
As much as it may annoy you, but a huge pile of actual abilities in Blizzard Games came from wild suggestions - the likes you regard as "pointless" and "doesn't help anyone" - crazy people like us actually made. They just got handed to other classes and not to Ret.