Point of order, literally every rifle that's not made by some sort of unscrupulous company will have this feature. That's not an "advantage". That's like saying having a seat belt in a car is an "advantage" when they all pretty much have it. Using your mini-14 example, it has a handguard that prevents you from burning yourself. A barrel shroud just encircles the whole barrel (the top half is what "matters") and provides no noticeable advantage with regards to burning yourself. It's pretty much impossible to have a rifle without a handguard, unless it's mounted on something or designed for bipod use only.
(This signature was removed for violation of the Avatar & Signature Guidelines)
I like that the consultant didn't necessarily agree with the idea and pointed out a pretty important thing. Using a rifle like this could easily cause as much problem as it could solve. Rifles like this are not the most optimal for closed quarters combat with a bunch of civilians in those closed quarters. Storage issues are a big cause as well. Locked in a car hasn't stopped a lot of people from stealing anything in a car. Also, being in the car seems a good distance from being useful in any situation. These are also retired or no longer police officers in this particular situation. At my school we had a legitimate police officer on duty there as a resource officer. But I think either way this is something that will never have an issue or reason for being. I think this fear mongering we have been doing about guns and shootings over the passed 10 years is getting ridiculous. Most places in the US are not nearly dangerous and we should stop making ourselves so scared over minimal probabilities. Then again it keeps the budgets big and lines the pockets of military contractors as once their military contract is up they can start selling to police and civilians all those wonderful weapons they create.
I'll agree that we have a cultural problem of glorifyin crime, but I disagree in saying that Americans Don't care about our fellow citizens.
I think we do for the most part.
Many just get jaded or sick of the people who bitch about how everyone has more than them and blame everyone else for their problems
I agree with this and it isn't just criminal culture, but our serious fascination with violence. Even on TV everything shown seems to be resolved with violence. That some how a physical fight will resolve an issue, when most of the time it just escalates the issue to more violence. We've normalized violence, but live in utter fear of sex and the human body. It's pretty impressive that we've made the idea of killing each other so normal, but the idea of boobs or dicks some kind of taboo thing to be vilified.
Well at least we can appear to agree that increasing mental health care capacity is a good thing.
I would also add far more stringent means of keeping guns out of the hands of the mentally ill. One part of which would be placing strict requirements on gun owners ( to secure their weapons) when a mentally ill person shares the same home. Such as the Sandy Hook killer.
I don't personally have a problem with this one particular measure of gun control. However I am not sure how to enforce it nor how it would realistically stop a crazy person should others in the home choose to ignore such court mandated orders.
I mean really, if someone doesn't secure their weapons with a known crazy person in the home. Well a shitty gun owner is a shitty gun owner not sure if a law is going to alleviate the situation.
Lol no. That is total bunk. People don't steal, murder, and sell drugs because they think its romantic. They do it to enrich themselves and because they don't give a damn about the harm they cause. Point 1) relates to the high levels of inequality to the US has where its hard to get ahead if you are poor (extremely low social mobility). Point 2) relates to the dog eat dog culture where no-one gives a damn about anyone else.
Yeah....no. Just look at the posts on this board about things like raising the minimum wage where you have comments that they should get a better job, or that they are just lazy, and so on. Or at all the continual race baiting threads. Heck, you have the leading republican candidate doing similar pretending he does not know who the ex-leader of the KKK was, or posting false crime statistics that smear blacks. Its clear that a hell of a lot of Amercians don't give a damn about wider society.
Simple, make the weapon owner responsible for the crime caused for failure to secure the weapon and allowing the mentally ill person access to it. Yes, it makes it harder on some owners, but until we get some ownership in these cases we are left out on a limb. I think it should be a criminal violation, but most folks are going to disagree. But if your kid mentally ill or not takes your gun and kills people, you've failed pretty heavily as a parent and as a gun owner. You failed to instill the value of human life, the basic rules of firearm operation and you couldn't be bothered to own a safe and not have your obviously mentally disturbed kid know the combination. That is on you and others die because of it. We hold people responsible for selling booze to intoxicated people, we should hold weapon owners responsible for getting guns in the hands of people who don't have the capacity for the value of human life.
- - - Updated - - -
He's using romanticize in the same sense as glorification. You numb the senses and show criminal people living this high life and it appears to be a means to the ends you are talking about. They go hand in hand actually. We make crime and violence look cool and sexy when it really isn't. Watch a real fight, looks nothing like TV, no one is smooth as Nero in Matrix, it is usually two oafs swinging relentlessly at each other until someone connects with a jaw.
That's pretty standard for cops in america to keep their rifles/shotguns in the vehicle if needed. YOu're not going to want to walk around with long guns. Usually there is a secondary lock inside the vehicle containing the weapons. As most people tend to be relatively close to their car, responding to their vehicle in case of a mass shooting is going to be far more efficient than simply calling 911/dispatch and waiting for someone to get a weapon and then respond to your location.