Well, I agree. Earth may not be where our future lies, but Mars certainly isn't either. It literally looks like Hell's backyard. Earth will have to be really messed up to be remotely as inhospitable. The Saharan desert 50 km away from your average oasis is a better place to live. And we haven't even begun talking Mars' lack of magnetic field.
No, doubt there could be more than small colonies on mars and probably mostly research/mining missions. It really isn't a nice place at all. Little water, too.
But the Mars-missions could ofc give much scientific data and work as a showcase for space-travelling technology that will hopefully bring some of Mankind to a nicer place in the future.
Last edited by Pengekaer; 2016-05-19 at 08:26 AM.
I don't think Obama cares about space and I also don't think democrats care about space exploration on average. They cant even afford to feed themselves, they don't care about science.
I wonder when Skroe learns that no one reads walls of text.
NASA budget..
Pinning anything about the budget on Obama is a fucking dishonesty.
Or, of course, stupidity of the person who blames him.
The budget is in complete control of Congress. In complete control of the Republican majority.
Now, since we have that out of the way.
NASA never got a big junk of money anyway, except the JFK era. The highest percentage was in 1965 and 1966 with over 4%.
Ever since the percentage went down constantly. And the last time it broke the 1% line was in 1993.
During Obama's presidency it went slightly down compared to Bush's presidency. By about 1/10 if a percent.
You can also tell where and when the shift happened.
When Bush took office the spending was at 0.7%..
And then came the war, and the spending gone down to 0.6%
Under Obama it gone down over time to 0.5%
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
So.... no profit, then?
I mean, sure, space-based technologies may end up being enormously profitable, specifically sending robots to gather resources. But colonization? That's retarded. You'd be better off colonizing siberia, or the ocean, or the fucking sky with floating blimp cities. More people on the planet is gonna drain our resources? Yeah, nowhere near as much as people living on Mars would drain them, who'd need absolutely everything sent to them from Earth.
Probably the best reason so far.
"Quack, quack, Mr. Bond."
That would be true for every position on the budget.
Since budget is just a list on what the country spends it's money for.
And with 0.5% of the federal budget, NASA is hardly a key player on the country's debt.
- - - Updated - - -
That is the same nonsense.
Illegal immigrants are in the US for a lot longer than you are already alive.
The country's debt comes from war after war after war..
1 month of warfare costs more than what 100 million illegal immigrants could get on welfare illegally in 1 year.
Last edited by Wildtree; 2016-05-19 at 09:52 AM.
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
They are all going home so it doesn't really matter right now, we will have our space program back when they are deported.
Well depending on who becomes the next president of the US, there might be a giant wall between the US and Mars to keep them Aliens out.
We should rid ourselves of the likes of you instead.
It would certainly increase the nations average IQ.
Again, these immigrants won't go anywhere. They are smarter than you have ever been.
Plus they are more honest. Some of them are already at work, or on their way to work. Contrary to you who is only a burden on the tax payers, since you don't contribute a thing.
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."