On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.
I don't know if it has been posted yet but when i look at lists like this : http://thereligionofpeace.com/attack...aspx?Yr=Last30 then the numbers look different.
Grants, most muslims kill primarly other muslims but that doesn't make it any better.
Collateral damage while attacking military targets != deliberate targeting of civilians.
BTW, mixing your military assets in with your civilians is a war crime.
"There is a pervasive myth that making content hard will induce players to rise to the occasion. We find the opposite. " -- Ghostcrawler
"The bit about hardcore players not always caring about the long term interests of the game is spot on." -- Ghostcrawler
"Do you want a game with no casuals so about 500 players?"
Yes you are right that evil western kid in Paris deserved to have his/hers dady killed and then being hostage for hours by this muslim monster that kills his mother infront of him.
Then the evil western police came and stopped the well deserved payback by killing the muslim infront of kid.
No u can go and fock ur self ppl are done listening to feminazi propaganda.
Also people who dont like civilians being hit by airstrikes maby like to go back to to medieval/ancient times? where they killed more people then all people dead in the syrian civil war with only sacking/razing one city, killing everyone inside?
Back in the days as many as a million civilian could be butchered taking on city, Bagdad for example when the mongols sacked it as many as 2 million civilians died, just one example there is plenty more. So the civilian death toll is much much smaller these days, some 200,000-400k dead in the syrian civil war so far over a few years, they killed that many taking one city back in the days, remember that the people who thinks civilian death tolls is to high today.
- - - Updated - - -
Or even ww1 or 2 where they leveled entire cities with civilians.
Last edited by ParanoiD84; 2016-06-14 at 02:19 PM.
This thread makes no sense if you sift through it. The difference is collateral damage.
Here is an example: The US is after a target of war, in the process of attacking that target, they accidentally kill civilians. That is bad. They try to avoid it but it happens. I would prefer they just leave the middle east and let it burn by itself.
Now if the USA did what ISIS and other terrorists groups did. Then they would specifically target civilians. In fact, why wouldn't they just nuke the Middle East? That is what they could do if the followed the Terrorist doctrine. They have morals however, so they do not. What if they (USA) focused on killing civilians? That would be horrible and just plain as evil as it gets...and the death toll would 100 times worse.
I wonder how the Middle East's civilians would feel if the world just left the Middle East to it selves. Just get the fuck out and leave. I suspect the death numbers would sky rocket.
** When you realize the person you're talking to is so clueless that they think you're the idiot **
Pardon my language, but what are you babbling about? Dude, you are advocating mass murder of civilians. Tell me how mass murdering civilians (among which there are homosexuals too), say, in Iraq helps get rid of the ideology that wants homosexuals burned alive in a cage (whatever that ideology is; you still failed to explain what ideology you are talking about). Why are you considering all civilians there to be religious fanatics? You yourself say that there is 3%, 4%, 7% public acceptance of it, and yet you advocate killing them all. What the hell?
Turn your brain on, man. In the US, over 70% people identify as Christian, and Christianity caused throughout the history countless deaths for silly religious reasons, just as Islam is causing in many places currently. Perhaps, you want to advocate killing all American civilians too (short of you, of course; you are saint, apparently)? Let's go all the way and just kill all humanity, so these problems disappear naturally, shall we?
What is a "liberal apologist"? Someone who thinks that mass murder is a bad idea? Guess I should be proud to be called one then.
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning.
-Kujako-
Dont you know? Intentions matters. If they can't understand that we didnt REALLY want to drone that wedding... it's their fault.
And yes you're right. Religious people usually are against homosexuality. That is the case in many western countries with pretty much all the main religious groups. That is like... christians and muslims.
But they've killed way more than 50. 50 is just one random attack, and it isn't even clear what the reasons of that attack were. Overall, in the last ~40 years, there were literally millions civilians killed throughout the Middle East by various warring groups.
Fair point about Christians, although, at least, nowadays they rarely express their dislike through murder. But 500 years ago it was quite different.
I'm embarrassed for you that you even posted this. Innocent people dying is never acceptable, but would there be drones attacking ISIS if there was no ISIS BLATANTLY KILLING INNOCENT MEN WOMEN AND CHILDREN?
Nice how you minimize the ISIS factor while you shove the collateral damage to the forefront.
"Indirectly" could mean any number of things, from rubble falling on someone days after a strike, to someone in a neighboring suburb dying from contaminated water due to the damaging of infrastructure. Also, that chart shows total direct and indirect deaths from all ordinance. Drones are just one weapon in an arsenal.
So OP, could you please separate out the "direct" from the "indirect" deaths in those figures, then further subdivide those into specifically drone-related deaths so that your chart is more relevant to your thread's title? K thnx.
~RAWR!
Do you do this a lot? Where you pretend I quoted a different post than I did?
THIS is what you said: And yes you're right. Religious people usually are against homosexuality. That is the case in many western countries with pretty much all the main religious groups. That is like... christians and muslims.
You are playing moral equivalency games and it's sad.
Also, do you have any idea how ridiculous you look when you act like a tough guy on a fucking MMO-C thread? I can't imagine a more douche bag thing to do. I really can't. We will all assume you have never once in your life spoken like that to another man in person.