Originally Posted by
v1perz53
So the way the stagger bar worked is that it is the % of your max HP you take over the duration of the stagger DoT (10 seconds), unless things have changed. Which means with a full stagger bar you are taking 10% HP damage per second. The question I have is, is stagger capped at a full bar? For example, you are tanking a bunch of mobs on mythic +6, you fill your stagger bar up completely, then you pop Fort Brew and keep ISB up (with High Tolerance, so over 100% stagger), what happens?
Do you (assuming only melee damage):
1. Take 10% of your HP per second from stagger DoT, add 10% of your HP worth of incoming damage to stagger DoT per second, and otherwise take full melee damage?
2. Add all melee damage to stagger, taking more than 10% of your HP in stagger damage per second, but the bar doesn't reflect this since it would be capped the whole time?
3. Take 10% of your HP per second in damage from stagger DoT, add 10% HP damage per second from mob melees back to stagger DoT per second, and take no melee damage otherwise? (there is no way this would be true, it would be too powerful, just here for completion sake)
The reason I ask is because if you watch any videos, you know it is very feasible in a big pull to get your stagger bar high into the red during trash in Mythic+ dungeons. Unless stagger works like my #2 option, you are only able to smooth damage if you would be taking less than 10% HP per second from trash mobs, above that and your stagger caps out in some way, so it stops being smooth at some point when it starts overflowing. And without purify it will overflow. Watching videos, tanks are taking WELL beyond 10% HP damage per second on trash pulls in Mythic +3, and these are non BrM tanks that have actual mitigation. Not counting avoidance, BrM has no inherent damage reduction over a Rogue in legion without purifying.
Unless things have changed drastically in Legion, this is not at all how stagger works. They very well might have changed, so I'm not saying you are totally wrong, but you might be totally wrong.