Clearly you have neither looked for a job recently or are totally unacquainted with contemporary HR recruitment practices.
- - - Updated - - -
Exactly how are they supposed to be attending college while working two jobs? Especially since higher paying jobs require tertiary qualification and there is no way you can 'save up' sufficient money even by working two jobs.
Everyone who wants to should be able to get a college degree.
What will filter out the pests will simply be the difficulty of it. There will never be a scenario where everyone has a phd because the majority of ppl simply dont have what it takes for it (lack of ambition, lack of will, to lazy or in some rare occasions lack of intellect).
Gettign a degre is something you need to work for but it should definetly be availible for everyone. To have a system where only the rich can get an education is horrible.
The amount of people who go for useless liberal arts degrees are greatly exaggerated, often for the purpose of arguing against the state paying for college.
But sure, I'd be all for the state funding mostly what you consider "useful" degrees and then like 0.1% dance theory degrees... since that's currently the norm anyway.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
yeah in denmark we get around 6300 kr/month while studying (for americans to relate this is around 950-1000 dollars). We also get the option to take a very low interest loan which you don't have to start paying back until 2 years after the education has ended.
This doesn't mean everybody gets a college degree though. But most people do get some sort of education after the equivalent to highschool.
No, they really aren't
Things like television studies, gender studies, etc are really just a complete waste of time and money made to give spoiled untalented brats degrees in useless things
It's better to teach those same students plumbing, joinery, carpentry and other useful trades
Last edited by mmoca8403991fd; 2016-07-09 at 12:51 AM.
That and humanities are already largely a minor percentage of degrees sought. People whining about funding women's studies seem to like to exaggerate just how many of those degrees are actually being handed out.
In my graduating class, the business school was like half the people at the ceremony, and science school was 1/3. It was funny though, when they called the social worker degree, the degree for people who go around and help the poor and disadvantaged, one person stood up. Kind of sad actually. I consider that something that's more needed than the millions of business degrees handed out every year.
I don't see these people whining about business majors who work at McD's though, which is kind of the norm now. It happens all the time, and then they say that degrees aren't needed to get good employment, meanwhile job positions that advertise as needing a bachelor's are hiring masters and PhD's.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
Wait what. I knew you guys in the US had to pay for your education but is that it? You don't need any actual grades? Our universities are free of charge but you compete for the limited spots each year with everyone else that want to go for said program and the ones with the best grades gets them.
There's definitely steep competition to get into good universities. And some programs that are really popular have some kind of mechanism to weed people out. During my undergrad, the 1st/2nd year physics courses were designed to be very hard in order to force the un-dedicated to drop. I've also heard of CS programs where you have to maintain a high GPA in the first two years or get kicked out of the program.
How harshly do they weed out people? I'm studying mechanical engineering at our royal institute of technology for one year and so far all our courses has had about a 25% fail rate. It is pretty consistent(so far back I can check) so I suppose that they're trying to weed out people, how does this compare to your university?
Not that bad. About <10% fail. But mostly that's due to curves at the end of the class. The goal was to get people to leave of their own volition by making tests so difficult as to be demoralizing: average scores below 40%, high scores frequently not being above 80%, etc.
Yes - there are decent social sciences like economics, finance, accounting, etc
Gender studies, media studies, art appreciation etc are not that - they have zero academic content, and zero usefulness
They are pretty much just a way of sending untalented kids to uni if they can't get degrees in science / econ type subjects
I went to a community college where they spent a bunch of money and a lot of years constructing a state of the art... administration building, complete with a tower that literally served no purpose except to look nice. And all we had to give up in return was the majority of summer classes, summer classes that a lot of people desperately needed because they also cut the number of slots in those classes during the normal academic year.