What did I quote?
The only quote I made from an article was that of the article that I posted.
Are you mistaking the sentences I've formulated into quote marks as article quotes?
I've formulated the sentences, since they're a proper reflection of sentences as you hear them with EVERY terror attack, while the investigations aren't concluded.
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
All the shit you put in quotation marks? You quoted me stuff from an article you didn't link and got angry that I didn't scroll up when you had linked the article you are quoting from in a post that you was replying to someone else. I don't think it's that hard to understand ...
- - - Updated - - -
Anyway, it's stupid to dwell on it.
What motivation to you think it was for a man to mow down innocent men, women and children, then start shooting at them?
What? Where?
The fuck are you talking about?
I haven't quoted ANYTHING.
Suddenly you quoted my first post and added an old redundant news bit.
- - - Updated - - -
I'd say so too..
Could be anything..What motivation to you think it was for a man to mow down innocent men, women and children, then start shooting at them?
Could be middle eastern terrorism, could be personal too.
He would not be the first person killing innocent people over personal issues.
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
Out of curiosity, what other cases have there been where someone killed anywhere near 80 people, due to personal issues? Not counting cases where every single one died at the very same moment (ie plane crash)? It is VERY unlikely that that was his sole motivation. Not impossible, I admit, but certainly very, very unlikely.
Well the guy did daily internet searches about verses of Quran. He also searched for nasheeds (islamic religious chanting, like the ISIS theme on those ISIS videos) and grew his beard for 8 days for religious reasons.
He had also done recent studying on other islamic terrorism acts like Charlie Hebdo and Orlando shootings.
http://www.iltalehti.fi/ulkomaat/201...27601_ul.shtml
They quote AP as the source. I'll take a look.
Nevermind I actually found em myself thanks for pointing that out. Mmochamp good source of news.
http://www.france24.com/en/20160718-...ouaiej-Bouhlel
- - - Updated - - -
Very informative article that one by the way.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/07/18...-massacre.html
The uncle of the truck driver who killed 84 people on the French Riviera says his nephew was indoctrinated about two weeks ago by an Algerian member of the Islamic State group in Nice, as anti-terrorism authorities question potential accomplices in the devastating attack.
Apparently he was also dating a 73-year-old man.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7142646.html
For many it is important, because they don't have a solution for how to integrate muslims in western society in such a way that this does not happen again and again.
Saying that "terrorist attacks is the price we are willing to pay..." sounds too hollow.
Denying the existence of a problem is thus the way to avoid presenting a solution they don't have, but it is obviously not working.
Thus people start listening to the ones that present a solution: meaning any solution, including 'ze final', showing once more that the road to hell is paved with good intentions.