Guy is a frigging hero for fighting the insane surveilance society, I really hope he wins his case!
Guy is a frigging hero for fighting the insane surveilance society, I really hope he wins his case!
You're just proving yourself wrong. You can spy and have surveillance on someone in public or private. Those words have nothing to do with a locations. When those things become illegal is when you do it on private property or recording people in public, in some countries, without permission.
Definition of spy
transitive verb
1
: to watch secretly usually for hostile purposes
2
: to catch sight of : see
3
: to search or look for intensively —usually used with out <spy out places fit for vending…goods — S. E. Morison>
intransitive verb
1
: to observe or search for something : look
2
: to watch secretly as a spy
Doesn't have to be secretive, and I never said it needs to be a secret.
Some of the data was gathered using devices which were a secret to him at the time, but that doesn't mean it remained a secret.
You can spy on people in the public. You're wrong.
On the one hand, I don't have an issue with the government keeping records of their citizen's public movements and activities. On the other hand, it seems like an awful lot of pointless data gathering on a person who has done little more than strongly voice their opinion.
Human progress isn't measured by industry. It's measured by the value you place on a life.
Just, be kind.
Yeah. Then again, every time some nutjobe performs a mass shooting, someone asks "why wasn't this guy under surveillance?"
Usually the answer is "because you opposed all forms of such stuff."
But I agree that it should be reserved for actually proven criminals (or suspected for a good reason) or diagnosed crazies.