It doesn't make sense because as a commander in the illidari why would I put someone as second in command who doesn't trust and will betray leadership? If he was willing to kill illidan (the demon hunter hero and idol) and his followers what makes me think he won't betray me as I get stronger? Altruism has shown to not out the legion threat as a priority and that cobtradicts the demon hunter's purpose.
Easy, I don't believe on the sacrifice of the innocents like Illidan and Kayn.
Hell, why we don't blow up the planet then? We "stop" Legion from getting Azeroth that way (that's the ideology that Kayn follows).
If you are going for extreme sacrifice route then you can just go join Sargeras. He is convinced too that destroying all potential world-souls is the sacrifice that must be made.
The nazis fought the communists. Doesn't mean they were good.
Illidan and his people furthered the destruction of Outland. They were just as bad as the Legion.
So then... why would I pick someone loyal to the core to Illidan, someone who could see no wrong in him? A fanatic?
No, they are only part of the Legion because they were weak. Was that not Illidan's speech? Only the weak fall to the Legion, maybe 1 in 10 would survive the training, the others would die, commit suicide or be put down after they went mad. Because they are weak. So if Varedis joined the Legion, he was weak.
- - - Updated - - -
Illidan was also planning to syphon all the water from Zangarmarsh and take it to the Black Temple where he would create a new Well of Eternity. While the rest of Outland would have died. Why would he have ever given Karabor once it contained a Well of Eternity? He would never have left.
This. While Altruis's methods might be extreme, Kayn is an active hazard because he blindly follows without questioning. He's essentially guiding the Illidari right back down the path Illidan took (which led to a naaru-led coalition to take him down). The definition of insanity is trying the exact same sequence of actions again while expecting a different outcome; mayhap it's time to let Altruis have his shot at guiding the demon hunters.
Be seeing you guys on Bloodsail Buccaneers NA!
That's why I added "sort of". Blizzard has been whitewashing Illidan for a while now. We're being told that all of his actions served a greater good and we were idiots for killing him atop the Black Temple. Under the light of this information Altruis' actions comes off wrong. He undermined Illidan's work, killed his students, that makes him a traitor to the Illidari. If you, as a demon hunter, shared Altruis' beliefs why have you stayed by Illidan's side until Black Temple raid anyway? He had your comrades killed, if you have no issues with that you shouldn't have stayed with the Illidari.
Imo.
Altruis vs Kayn is probably the best lore blizzard has created so far.
Both are imo equally as flawed.
Shath'mag vwyq shu et'agthu, Shath'mag sshk ye! Krz'ek fhn'z agash zz maqdahl or'kaaxth'ma amqa!
The Black Empire once ruled this pitiful world, and it will do so again! Your pitiful kind will know only despair and sorrow for a hundred thousand millennia to come!
Avatar drawn by Sir Meo
And he refuses on the grounds that he is opposed to Illidan no matter the cost. As I said, he could care less if the Burning Legion destroys the whole universe so long as Illidan doesn't get his way. It's one thing to hold a grudge, but to literally doom the whole universe to destruction for the sake of that grudge is what makes me give two shits about what Akama wants or how he feels.
I personally will choose Kayn because I don't trust Akama, he betrayed both Illidan and Maiev, who is to say He won't betray us to the Legion next
Nostalgia or someone really hating Illidan.
No other reasons really, if he was just a deserter then fine. But he payed people to KILL other demon hunters.